Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Avner Elizarov

dblp:235/2572 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Concurrent programming · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Concurrent programming
concurrent data structures
0.412019
LOFT: lock-free transactional data structures · PPoPP 2019
Parallel and multicore computing › transactional memory
contention management
0.412019
LOFT: lock-free transactional data structures · PPoPP 2019
Parallel and multicore computing
transactional memory
0.412019
LOFT: lock-free transactional data structures · PPoPP 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lock-free synchronization · 0.8helping mechanism · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 LOFT: lock-free transactional data structures
abstract
Concurrent data structures are widely used in modern multicore architectures, providing atomicity (linearizability) for each concurrent operation. However, it is often desirable to execute several operations on multiple data structures atomically. We present a design of a transactional framework supporting linearizable transactions of multiple operations on multiple data structures in a lock-free manner. Our design uses a helping mechanism to obtain lock-freedom, and an advanced lock-free contention management mechanism to mitigate the effects of aborting transactions. When cyclic helping conflicts are detected, the contention manager reorders the conflicting transactions execution allowing all transactions to complete with minimal delay. To exemplify this framework we implement a transactional set using a skip-list, a transactional queue, and a transactional register. We present an evaluation of the system showing that we outperform general software transactional memory, and are competitive with lock-based transactional data structures.
Avner Elizarov, Guy Golan-Gueta, Erez Petrank
PPoPP1