Michael Reichle

dblp:235/4706 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
18ranked-venue papers
1as first author
18since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-3498-5472ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 18 · 1 first-author · 18 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Playing Tag with Okamoto-Schnorr: Three-Move Pairing-Free Blind Signatures from DDH
Rutchathon Chairattana-Apirom, Michael Reichle, Stefano Tessaro
CRYPTO (7)2
2026 Blind Signatures from Arguments of Inequality
Michael Klooß, Russell W. F. Lai, Michael Reichle
CRYPTO (7)3
2026 Adaptively-Secure Three-Round Threshold Schnorr from DL
Guilhem Niot, Michael Reichle, Kaoru Takemure
EUROCRYPT (1)2
2026 Threshold Blind Signatures from CDH
Michael Reichle, Zoé Reinke
PKC (1)1
2026 Lattice-Based Threshold Blind Signatures
abstract
International audience
Sebastian Faller, Guilhem Niot, Michael Reichle
SP3
2025 Tightly-Secure Blind Signatures in Pairing-Free Groups
abstract
We construct the first blind signature scheme that achieves all of the following properties simultaneously: The third property enables a reasonably efficient solution, and in fact signatures in our scheme comprise 10 group elements and 29 $$\mathbb {Z} _p$$ -elements. Our scheme starts from a pairing-based non-blind signature scheme (Abe et al., JoC 2023), and uses recent techniques of Chairattana-Apirom, Tessaro, and Zhu (CRYPTO 2024) to replace the pairings used in this scheme with non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs in the random oracle model. This conversion is not generic or straightforward (also because prior works have converted only significantly simpler signature schemes), and we are required to improve upon and innovate existing techniques in several places. As an interesting side note, and unlike previous works, our techniques only require a non-programmable random oracle, and our signature scheme achieves predicate blindness (which means that the user can prove statements about the signed message during the signing process).
Nicholas Brandt, Dennis Hofheinz, Michael Klooß, Michael Reichle
ASIACRYPT (6)4
2025 Blind Signatures from Proofs of Inequality
Michael Klooß, Michael Reichle
CRYPTO (6)2
2025 Unmasking TRaccoon: A Lattice-Based Threshold Signature with An Efficient Identifiable Abort Protocol
Rafaël Del Pino, Shuichi Katsumata, Guilhem Niot, Michael Reichle, Kaoru Takemure
CRYPTO (6)4
2025 Security Amplification of Threshold Signatures in the Standard Model
Karen Azari, Cecilia Boschini, Kristina Hostáková, Michael Reichle
TCC (3)4
2024 Practical Blind Signatures in Pairing-Free Groups
Michael Klooß, Michael Reichle, Benedikt Wagner
ASIACRYPT (1)2
2024 Pairing-Free Blind Signatures from Standard Assumptions in the ROM
Julia Kastner 0001, Ky Nguyen, Michael Reichle
CRYPTO (1)3
2024 Adaptively Secure 5 Round Threshold Signatures from MLWE/MSIS and DL with Rewinding
Shuichi Katsumata, Michael Reichle, Kaoru Takemure
CRYPTO (7)2
2023 Practical Round-Optimal Blind Signatures in the ROM from Standard Assumptions
Shuichi Katsumata, Michael Reichle, Yusuke Sakai 0001
ASIACRYPT (2)2
2023 Hermes: I/O-Efficient Forward-Secure Searchable Symmetric Encryption
Brice Minaud, Michael Reichle
ASIACRYPT (6)2
2022 Sharp: Short Relaxed Range Proofs
abstract
We provide optimized range proofs, called Sharp, in discrete logarithm and hidden order groups, based on square decomposition. In the former setting, we build on the paradigm of Couteau et al. (Eurocrypt '21) and optimize their range proof (from now on, CKLR) in several ways: (1) We introduce batching via vector commitments and an adapted ∑;-protocol. (2) We introduce a new group switching strategy to reduce communication. (3) As repetitions are necessary to instantiate CKLR in standard groups, we provide a novel batch shortness test that allows for cheaper repetitions. The analysis of our test is nontrivial and forms a core technical contribution of our work. For example, for λ = 128 bit security and B = 64 bit ranges for N = 1 (resp. N = 8) proof(s), we reduce the proof size by 34% (resp. 75%) in arbitrary groups, and by 66% (resp. 88%) in groups of order 256-bit, compared to CKLR.
Geoffroy Couteau, Dahmun Goudarzi, Michael Klooß, Michael Reichle
CCS4
2022 Dynamic Local Searchable Symmetric Encryption
Brice Minaud, Michael Reichle
CRYPTO (4)2
2021 SSE and SSD: Page-Efficient Searchable Symmetric Encryption
Angèle Bossuat, Raphael Bost, Pierre-Alain Fouque, Brice Minaud, Michael Reichle
CRYPTO (3)5
2021 Efficient Range Proofs with Transparent Setup from Bounded Integer Commitments
Geoffroy Couteau, Michael Klooß, Huang Lin, Michael Reichle
EUROCRYPT (3)4