Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

James E. Kostas

dblp:236/4207 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Reinforcement learning · 77% Learning theory · 12% Video understanding and tracking · 9%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient
0.922021
Structural Credit Assignment in Neural Networks using Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2021
Asynchronous Coagent Networks · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
credit assignment
0.512021
Structural Credit Assignment in Neural Networks using Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.512021
High Confidence Generalization for Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning
0.512021
High Confidence Generalization for Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
hierarchical reinforcement learning
0.412020
Asynchronous Coagent Networks · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning
option-critic
0.412020
Asynchronous Coagent Networks · ICML 2020
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › video representation learning
action representation learning
0.412019
Learning Action Representations for Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
generalization in reinforcement learning
0.412019
Learning Action Representations for Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy reinforcement learning
0.112021
Structural Credit Assignment in Neural Networks using Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning
state representation learning
0.112019
Learning Action Representations for Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variance reduction · 0.5probabilistic safety guarantees · 0.5off-policy reinforcement learning · 0.5REINFORCE · 0.5MDP generalization · 0.5recurrent network · 0.4convergence analysis · 0.4asynchronous networks · 0.4policy decomposition · 0.4low-dimensional action embedding · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 High Confidence Generalization for Reinforcement Learning
abstract
We present several classes of reinforcement learning algorithms that safely generalize to Markov decision processes (MDPs) not seen during training. Specifically, we study the setting in which some set of MDPs is accessible for training. The goal is to generalize safely to MDPs that are sampled from the same distribution, but which may not be in the set accessible for training. For various definitions of safety, our algorithms give probabilistic guarantees that agents can safely generalize to MDPs that are sampled from the same distribution but are not necessarily in the training set. These algorithms are a type of Seldonian algorithm (Thomas et al., 2019), which is a class of machine learning algorithms that return models with probabilistic safety guarantees for user-specified definitions of safety.
James E. Kostas, Yash Chandak, Scott M. Jordan, Georgios Theocharous, Philip S. Thomas
ICML1
2021 Structural Credit Assignment in Neural Networks using Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Structural credit assignment in neural networks is a long-standing problem, with a variety of alternatives to backpropagation proposed to allow for local training of nodes. One of the early strategies was to treat each node as an agent and use a reinforcement learning method called REINFORCE to update each node locally with only a global reward signal. In this work, we revisit this approach and investigate if we can leverage other reinforcement learning approaches to improve learning. We first formalize training a neural network as a finite-horizon reinforcement learning problem and discuss how this facilitates using ideas from reinforcement learning like off-policy learning. We show that the standard on-policy REINFORCE approach, even with a variety of variance reduction approaches, learns suboptimal solutions. We introduce an off-policy approach, to facilitate reasoning about the greedy action for other agents and help overcome stochasticity in other agents. We conclude by showing that these networks of agents can be more robust to correlated samples when learning online.
Dhawal Gupta, Gabor Mihucz, Matthew Schlegel, James E. Kostas, Philip S. Thomas, Martha White
NeurIPS4
2020 Asynchronous Coagent Networks
abstract
Coagent policy gradient algorithms (CPGAs) are reinforcement learning algorithms for training a class of stochastic neural networks called coagent networks. In this work, we prove that CPGAs converge to locally optimal policies. Additionally, we extend prior theory to encompass asynchronous and recurrent coagent networks. These extensions facilitate the straightforward design and analysis of hierarchical reinforcement learning algorithms like the option-critic, and eliminate the need for complex derivations of customized learning rules for these algorithms.
James E. Kostas, Chris Nota, Philip S. Thomas
ICML1
2019 Learning Action Representations for Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Most model-free reinforcement learning methods leverage state representations (embeddings) for generalization, but either ignore structure in the space of actions or assume the structure is provided a priori. We show how a policy can be decomposed into a component that acts in a low-dimensional space of action representations and a component that transforms these representations into actual actions. These representations improve generalization over large, finite action sets by allowing the agent to infer the outcomes of actions similar to actions already taken. We provide an algorithm to both learn and use action representations and provide conditions for its convergence. The efficacy of the proposed method is demonstrated on large-scale real-world problems.
Yash Chandak, Georgios Theocharous, James E. Kostas, Scott M. Jordan, Philip S. Thomas
ICML3