VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
James E. Kostas
dblp:236/4207
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 77% Learning theory · 12% Video understanding and tracking · 9% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Structural Credit Assignment in Neural Networks using Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2021 Asynchronous Coagent Networks · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
credit assignment |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Structural Credit Assignment in Neural Networks using Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | High Confidence Generalization for Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | High Confidence Generalization for Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
hierarchical reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Asynchronous Coagent Networks · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning
option-critic |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Asynchronous Coagent Networks · ICML 2020 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › video representation learning
action representation learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning Action Representations for Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
generalization in reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning Action Representations for Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy reinforcement learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Structural Credit Assignment in Neural Networks using Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning
state representation learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Learning Action Representations for Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variance reduction · 0.5probabilistic safety guarantees · 0.5off-policy reinforcement learning · 0.5REINFORCE · 0.5MDP generalization · 0.5recurrent network · 0.4convergence analysis · 0.4asynchronous networks · 0.4policy decomposition · 0.4low-dimensional action embedding · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | High Confidence Generalization for Reinforcement LearningabstractWe present several classes of reinforcement learning algorithms that safely generalize to Markov decision processes (MDPs) not seen during training. Specifically, we study the setting in which some set of MDPs is accessible for training. The goal is to generalize safely to MDPs that are sampled from the same distribution, but which may not be in the set accessible for training. For various definitions of safety, our algorithms give probabilistic guarantees that agents can safely generalize to MDPs that are sampled from the same distribution but are not necessarily in the training set. These algorithms are a type of Seldonian algorithm (Thomas et al., 2019), which is a class of machine learning algorithms that return models with probabilistic safety guarantees for user-specified definitions of safety. James E. Kostas, Yash Chandak, Scott M. Jordan, Georgios Theocharous, Philip S. Thomas |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | Structural Credit Assignment in Neural Networks using Reinforcement LearningabstractStructural credit assignment in neural networks is a long-standing problem, with a variety of alternatives to backpropagation proposed to allow for local training of nodes. One of the early strategies was to treat each node as an agent and use a reinforcement learning method called REINFORCE to update each node locally with only a global reward signal. In this work, we revisit this approach and investigate if we can leverage other reinforcement learning approaches to improve learning. We first formalize training a neural network as a finite-horizon reinforcement learning problem and discuss how this facilitates using ideas from reinforcement learning like off-policy learning. We show that the standard on-policy REINFORCE approach, even with a variety of variance reduction approaches, learns suboptimal solutions. We introduce an off-policy approach, to facilitate reasoning about the greedy action for other agents and help overcome stochasticity in other agents. We conclude by showing that these networks of agents can be more robust to correlated samples when learning online. Dhawal Gupta, Gabor Mihucz, Matthew Schlegel, James E. Kostas, Philip S. Thomas, Martha White |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2020 | Asynchronous Coagent NetworksabstractCoagent policy gradient algorithms (CPGAs) are reinforcement learning algorithms for training a class of stochastic neural networks called coagent networks. In this work, we prove that CPGAs converge to locally optimal policies. Additionally, we extend prior theory to encompass asynchronous and recurrent coagent networks. These extensions facilitate the straightforward design and analysis of hierarchical reinforcement learning algorithms like the option-critic, and eliminate the need for complex derivations of customized learning rules for these algorithms. James E. Kostas, Chris Nota, Philip S. Thomas |
ICML | 1 |
| 2019 | Learning Action Representations for Reinforcement LearningabstractMost model-free reinforcement learning methods leverage state representations (embeddings) for generalization, but either ignore structure in the space of actions or assume the structure is provided a priori. We show how a policy can be decomposed into a component that acts in a low-dimensional space of action representations and a component that transforms these representations into actual actions. These representations improve generalization over large, finite action sets by allowing the agent to infer the outcomes of actions similar to actions already taken. We provide an algorithm to both learn and use action representations and provide conditions for its convergence. The efficacy of the proposed method is demonstrated on large-scale real-world problems. Yash Chandak, Georgios Theocharous, James E. Kostas, Scott M. Jordan, Philip S. Thomas |
ICML | 3 |