VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Philipp Seifer
dblp:236/4486
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-7421-2060ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | eSPARQL: Representing and Reconciling Agnostic and Atheistic Beliefs in RDF-star Knowledge Graphs
Xinyi Pan, Daniel Hernández 0002, Philipp Seifer, Ralf Lämmel, Steffen Staab |
ISWC (2) | 3 |
| 2024 | From Shapes to Shapes: Inferring SHACL Shapes for Results of SPARQL CONSTRUCT QueriesabstractSPARQL CONSTRUCT queries allow for the specification of data processing pipelines that transform given input graphs into new output graphs. It is now common to constrain graphs through SHACL shapes allowing users to understand which data they can expect and which not. However, it becomes challenging to understand what graph data can be expected at the end of a data processing pipeline without knowing the particular input data: Shape constraints on the input graph may affect the output graph, but may no longer apply literally, and new shapes may be imposed by the query template. In this paper, we study the derivation of shape constraints that hold on all possible output graphs of a given SPARQL CONSTRUCT query. We assume that the SPARQL CONSTRUCT query is fixed, e.g., being part of a program, whereas the input graphs adhere to input shape constraints but may otherwise vary over time and, thus, are mostly unknown. We study a fragment of SPARQL CONSTRUCT queries (SCCQ) and a fragment of SHACL (Simple SHACL). We formally define the problem of deriving the most restrictive set of Simple SHACL shapes that constrain the results from evaluating a SCCQ over any input graph restricted by a given set of Simple SHACL shapes. We propose and implement an algorithm that statically analyses input SHACL shapes and CONSTRUCT queries and prove its soundness and complexity. Philipp Seifer, Daniel Hernández 0002, Ralf Lämmel, Steffen Staab |
WWW | 1 |
| 2021 | ProGS: Property Graph Shapes Language
Philipp Seifer, Ralf Lämmel, Steffen Staab |
ISWC | 1 |
| 2020 | Deciding SHACL Shape Containment Through Description Logics Reasoning
Martin Leinberger, Philipp Seifer, Tjitze Rienstra, Ralf Lämmel, Steffen Staab |
ISWC (1) | 2 |
| 2019 | Type Checking Program Code Using SHACL
Martin Leinberger, Philipp Seifer, Claudia Schon, Ralf Lämmel, Steffen Staab |
ISWC (1) | 2 |
| 2019 | Empirical study on the usage of graph query languages in open source Java projectsabstractGraph data models are interesting in various domains, in part because of the intuitiveness and flexibility they offer compared to relational models. Specialized query languages, such as Cypher for property graphs or SPARQL for RDF, facilitate their use. In this paper, we present an empirical study on the usage of graph-based query languages in open-source Java projects on GitHub. We investigate the usage of SPARQL, Cypher, Gremlin and GraphQL in terms of popularity and their development over time. We select repositories based on dependencies related to these technologies and employ various popularity and source-code based filters and ranking features for a targeted selection of projects. For the concrete languages SPARQL and Cypher, we analyze the activity of repositories over time. For SPARQL, we investigate common application domains, query use and existence of ontological data modeling in applications that query for concrete instance data. Our results show, that the usage of graph query languages in open-source projects increased over the last years, with SPARQL and Cypher being by far the most popular. SPARQL projects are more active in terms of query related artifact changes and unique developers involved, but Cypher is catching up. Relatively few applications use SPARQL to query for concrete instance data: A majority of those applications employ multiple different ontologies, including project and domain specific ones. Common application domains are management systems and data visualization tools. Philipp Seifer, Johannes Härtel, Martin Leinberger, Ralf Lämmel, Steffen Staab |
SLE | 1 |