Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Parastoo Karami
dblp:236/4526
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video coding · 50% Image and video processing · 50% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video coding
image quality assessment |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Perceptual Distinguishability Predictor For JND-Noise-Contaminated Images · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
multilayer neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | A Perceptual Distinguishability Predictor For JND-Noise-Contaminated Images · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sparse coding · 0.8feature extraction · 0.8multilayer neural network · 0.4multi-layer neural network · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | A Perceptual Distinguishability Predictor For JND-Noise-Contaminated ImagesabstractJust noticeable difference (JND) models are widely used for perceptual redundancy estimation in images and videos. A common method for measuring the accuracy of a JND model is to inject random noise in an image based on the JND model, and check whether the JND-noise-contaminated image is perceptually distinguishable from the original image or not. Also, when comparing the accuracy of two different JND models, the model that produces the JND-noise-contaminated image with better quality at the same level of noise energy is the better model. But in both of these cases, a subjective test is necessary, which is very time consuming and costly. In this paper, we present a full-reference metric called PDP (perceptual distinguishability predictor), which can be used to determine whether a given JND-noise-contaminated image is perceptually distinguishable from the reference image. The proposed metric employs the concept of sparse coding, and extracts a feature vector out of a given image pair. The feature vector is then fed to a multilayer neural network for classification. To train the network, we built a public database of 999 natural images with distinguishbility thresholds for four different JND models obtained from an extensive subjective experiment. The results indicated that PDD achieves high classification accuracy of 97.1%. The proposed method can be used to objectively compare various JND models without performing any subjective test. It can also be used to obtain proper scaling factors to improve the JND thresholds estimated by an arbitrary JND model. Hadi Hadizadeh, Ahmad Reza Heravi, Ivan V. Bajic, Parastoo Karami |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 4 |