Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wouter Van Gansbeke
dblp:236/4653
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-0861-5264ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 28% Representation and self-supervised learning · 24% Generative modeling · 19% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
1.0 | 2 | 2021 | Revisiting Contrastive Methods for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations · NeurIPS 2021 Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation by Contrasting Object Mask Proposals · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Simple Latent Diffusion Approach for Panoptic Segmentation and Mask Inpainting · ECCV (15) 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
latent diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Simple Latent Diffusion Approach for Panoptic Segmentation and Mask Inpainting · ECCV (15) 2024 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
panoptic segmentation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Simple Latent Diffusion Approach for Panoptic Segmentation and Mask Inpainting · ECCV (15) 2024 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.7 | 2 | 2021 | Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation by Contrasting Object Mask Proposals · ICCV 2021 Revisiting Contrastive Methods for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multi-Task Learning for Dense Prediction Tasks: A Survey · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Revisiting Contrastive Methods for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations · NeurIPS 2021 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › annotation-efficient segmentation
unsupervised semantic segmentation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation by Contrasting Object Mask Proposals · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
visual representation learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Revisiting Contrastive Methods for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations · NeurIPS 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | SCAN: Learning to Classify Images Without Labels · ECCV (10) 2020 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification › label-efficient image classification
unsupervised image classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | SCAN: Learning to Classify Images Without Labels · ECCV (10) 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
unsupervised representation learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | SCAN: Learning to Classify Images Without Labels · ECCV (10) 2020 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
image inpainting |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | A Simple Latent Diffusion Approach for Panoptic Segmentation and Mask Inpainting · ECCV (15) 2024 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
dense prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Multi-Task Learning for Dense Prediction Tasks: A Survey · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Multi-Task Learning for Dense Prediction Tasks: A Survey · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video instance segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Revisiting Contrastive Methods for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
latent diffusion · 1.5contrastive learning · 1.4shared representation learning · 0.6optimization · 0.6nearest neighbor · 0.5k-means clustering · 0.5clustering · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | A Simple Latent Diffusion Approach for Panoptic Segmentation and Mask Inpainting
Wouter Van Gansbeke, Bert De Brabandere |
ECCV (15) | 1 |
| 2022 | Multi-Task Learning for Dense Prediction Tasks: A SurveyabstractWith the advent of deep learning, many dense prediction tasks, i.e., tasks that produce pixel-level predictions, have seen significant performance improvements. The typical approach is to learn these tasks in isolation, that is, a separate neural network is trained for each individual task. Yet, recent multi-task learning (MTL) techniques have shown promising results w.r.t. performance, computations and/or memory footprint, by jointly tackling multiple tasks through a learned shared representation. In this survey, we provide a well-rounded view on state-of-the-art deep learning approaches for MTL in computer vision, explicitly emphasizing on dense prediction tasks. Our contributions concern the following. First, we consider MTL from a network architecture point-of-view. We include an extensive overview and discuss the advantages/disadvantages of recent popular MTL models. Second, we examine various optimization methods to tackle the joint learning of multiple tasks. We summarize the qualitative elements of these works and explore their commonalities and differences. Finally, we provide an extensive experimental evaluation across a variety of dense prediction benchmarks to examine the pros and cons of the different methods, including both architectural and optimization based strategies. Simon Vandenhende, Stamatios Georgoulis, Wouter Van Gansbeke, Marc Proesmans, Dengxin Dai, Luc Van Gool |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 3 |
| 2021 | Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation by Contrasting Object Mask ProposalsabstractBeing able to learn dense semantic representations of images without supervision is an important problem in computer vision. However, despite its significance, this problem remains rather unexplored, with a few exceptions that considered unsupervised semantic segmentation on small-scale datasets with a narrow visual domain. In this paper, we make a first attempt to tackle the problem on datasets that have been traditionally utilized for the supervised case. To achieve this, we introduce a two-step framework that adopts a predetermined mid-level prior in a contrastive optimization objective to learn pixel embeddings. This marks a large deviation from existing works that relied on proxy tasks or end-to-end clustering. Additionally, we argue about the importance of having a prior that contains information about objects, or their parts, and discuss several possibilities to obtain such a prior in an unsupervised manner.Experimental evaluation shows that our method comes with key advantages over existing works. First, the learned pixel embeddings can be directly clustered in semantic groups using K-Means on PASCAL. Under the fully unsupervised setting, there is no precedent in solving the semantic segmentation task on such a challenging benchmark. Second, our representations can improve over strong baselines when transferred to new datasets, e.g. COCO and DAVIS. The code is available1. Wouter Van Gansbeke, Simon Vandenhende, Stamatios Georgoulis, Luc Van Gool |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2021 | Revisiting Contrastive Methods for Unsupervised Learning of Visual RepresentationsabstractContrastive self-supervised learning has outperformed supervised pretraining on many downstream tasks like segmentation and object detection. However, current methods are still primarily applied to curated datasets like ImageNet. In this paper, we first study how biases in the dataset affect existing methods. Our results show that an approach like MoCo works surprisingly well across: (i) object- versus scene-centric, (ii) uniform versus long-tailed and (iii) general versus domain-specific datasets. Second, given the generality of the approach, we try to realize further gains with minor modifications. We show that learning additional invariances - through the use of multi-scale cropping, stronger augmentations and nearest neighbors - improves the representations. Finally, we observe that MoCo learns spatially structured representations when trained with a multi-crop strategy. The representations can be used for semantic segment retrieval and video instance segmentation without finetuning. Moreover, the results are on par with specialized models. We hope this work will serve as a useful study for other researchers. Wouter Van Gansbeke, Simon Vandenhende, Stamatios Georgoulis, Luc Van Gool |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | SCAN: Learning to Classify Images Without Labels
Wouter Van Gansbeke, Simon Vandenhende, Stamatios Georgoulis, Marc Proesmans, Luc Van Gool |
ECCV (10) | 1 |