Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aleksandr Shevchenko
dblp:236/5747
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 38% Optimization for machine learning · 35% Learning theory · 20% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
autoencoder |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Compression of Structured Data with Autoencoders: Provable Benefit of Nonlinearities and Depth · ICML 2024 Fundamental Limits of Two-layer Autoencoders, and Achieving Them with Gradient Methods · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient-based optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fundamental Limits of Two-layer Autoencoders, and Achieving Them with Gradient Methods · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › non-convex optimization
landscape analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fundamental Limits of Two-layer Autoencoders, and Achieving Them with Gradient Methods · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Compression of Structured Data with Autoencoders: Provable Benefit of Nonlinearities and Depth · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient descent analysis · 0.8approximate message passing · 0.8population risk analysis · 0.7gradient descent · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Attention with Trained Embeddings Provably Selects Important TokensabstractToken embeddings play a crucial role in language modeling but, despite this practical relevance, their theoretical understanding is limited. Our paper addresses the gap by characterizing the structure of embeddings obtained via gradient descent. Specifically, we consider a one-layer softmax attention model with a linear head for binary classification, i.e., $\mathrm{Softmax}( p^\top E_X^\top ) E_X v = \frac{ \sum_{i=1}^T \exp(p^\top E_{x_i}) E_{x_i}^\top v}{\sum_{j=1}^T \exp(p^\top E_{x_{j}}) }$, where $E_X = [ E_{x_1} , \dots, E_{x_T} ]^\top$ contains the embeddings of the input sequence, $p$ is the embedding of the $\mathrm{\langle cls \rangle}$ token and $v$ the output vector. First, we show that, already after a single step of gradient training with the standard logistic loss, the embeddings $E_X$ capture the importance of tokens in the dataset by aligning with the output vector $v$ proportionally to the corresponding average signed frequency that captures the relevance of tokens to the labels. Then, after training $p$ via gradient flow until convergence, the softmax selects the important tokens in the sentence (i.e., those that are predictive of the label), and the resulting $\mathrm{\langle cls \rangle}$ embedding maximizes the margin for such a selection. Experiments on real-world datasets (IMDB, Yelp) exhibit a phenomenology close to that unveiled by our theory. Diyuan Wu, Aleksandr Shevchenko, Samet Oymak, Marco Mondelli |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | Compression of Structured Data with Autoencoders: Provable Benefit of Nonlinearities and DepthabstractAutoencoders are a prominent model in many empirical branches of machine learning and lossy data compression. However, basic theoretical questions remain unanswered even in a shallow two-layer setting. In particular, to what degree does a shallow autoencoder capture the structure of the underlying data distribution? For the prototypical case of the 1-bit compression of *sparse* Gaussian data, we prove that gradient descent converges to a solution that completely disregards the sparse structure of the input. Namely, the performance of the algorithm is the same as if it was compressing a Gaussian source -- with no sparsity. For general data distributions, we give evidence of a phase transition phenomenon in the shape of the gradient descent minimizer, as a function of the data sparsity: below the critical sparsity level, the minimizer is a rotation taken uniformly at random (just like in the compression of non-sparse data); above the critical sparsity, the minimizer is the identity (up to a permutation). Finally, by exploiting a connection with approximate message passing algorithms, we show how to improve upon Gaussian performance for the compression of sparse data: adding a denoising function to a shallow architecture already reduces the loss provably, and a suitable multi-layer decoder leads to a further improvement. We validate our findings on image datasets, such as CIFAR-10 and MNIST. Kevin Kögler, Aleksandr Shevchenko, Seyed Hamed Hassani, Marco Mondelli |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | Fundamental Limits of Two-layer Autoencoders, and Achieving Them with Gradient MethodsabstractAutoencoders are a popular model in many branches of machine learning and lossy data compression. However, their fundamental limits, the performance of gradient methods and the features learnt during optimization remain poorly understood, even in the two-layer setting. In fact, earlier work has considered either linear autoencoders or specific training regimes (leading to vanishing or diverging compression rates). Our paper addresses this gap by focusing on non-linear two-layer autoencoders trained in the challenging proportional regime in which the input dimension scales linearly with the size of the representation. Our results characterize the minimizers of the population risk, and show that such minimizers are achieved by gradient methods; their structure is also unveiled, thus leading to a concise description of the features obtained via training. For the special case of a sign activation function, our analysis establishes the fundamental limits for the lossy compression of Gaussian sources via (shallow) autoencoders. Finally, while the results are proved for Gaussian data, numerical simulations on standard datasets display the universality of the theoretical predictions. Aleksandr Shevchenko, Kevin Kögler, Seyed Hamed Hassani, Marco Mondelli |
ICML | 1 |