Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vikram Jadhao
dblp:236/5809
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-8034-2654ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 88% Distributed systems · 7% High-performance computing · 5% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource management |
0.6 | 2 | 2022 | Modeling The Temporally Constrained Preemptions of Transient Cloud VMs · HPDC 2020 SciSpot: Scientific Computing On Temporally Constrained Cloud Preemptible VMs · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2022 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud applications
cloud-based scientific computing |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | SciSpot: Scientific Computing On Temporally Constrained Cloud Preemptible VMs · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2022 |
Distributed systems › distributed resource management
server selection |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | SciSpot: Scientific Computing On Temporally Constrained Cloud Preemptible VMs · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2022 |
High-performance computing › scientific computing
scientific workload |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Modeling The Temporally Constrained Preemptions of Transient Cloud VMs · HPDC 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical mechanics · 0.6reliability modeling · 0.6reliability theory · 0.4probability modeling · 0.4empirical study · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | SciSpot: Scientific Computing On Temporally Constrained Cloud Preemptible VMsabstractScientific computing applications are being increasingly deployed on cloud computing platforms. Transient servers such as EC2 spot instances and Google Preemptible VMs, can be used to lower the costs of running applications on the cloud by up to$10\times$. However, the frequent preemptions and resource heterogeneity of these transient servers introduces many challenges in their effective and efficient use. In this paper, we develop techniques for modeling and mitigating preemptions of transient servers, and present SciSpot, a software framework that enables low-cost scientific computing on the cloud. SciSpot deploys applications on Google Cloud Preemptible Virtual Machines that exhibit temporally constrained preemptions: VMs are always preempted in a 24 hour interval. Our empirical analysis shows that the preemption rate is generally bathtub shaped, which raises multiple fundamental challenges in performance modeling and policy design. We develop a new reliability model for temporally constrained preemptions, and use statistical mechanics to show why the bathtub shape is generally exhibited. SciSpot’s design is guided by our observation that many emerging scientific computing applications that integrate machine learning with simulations, can be deployed as “bags” of jobs, which represent multiple instantiations of the same computation with different physical model parameters. For a bag of jobs, SciSpot finds the optimal transient server on-the-fly, by taking into account the price, performance, and preemption rates of different servers. SciSpot reduces costs by$5\times$compared to conventional cloud deployments, and reduces makespans by up to$10\times$compared to conventional high performance computing clusters. J. C. S. Kadupitiya, Vikram Jadhao, Prateek Sharma 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. | 2 |
| 2021 | Molecular Dynamics Simulations on Cloud Computing and Machine Learning PlatformsabstractScientific computing applications have benefited greatly from high performance computing infrastructure such as supercomputers. However, we are seeing a paradigm shift in the computational structure, design, and requirements of these applications. Increasingly, data-driven and machine learning approaches are being used to support, speed-up, and enhance scientific computing applications, especially molecular dynamics simulations. Concurrently, cloud computing platforms are increasingly appealing for scientific computing, providing “infi-nite” computing powers, easier programming and deployment models, and access to computing accelerators such as TPUs (Tensor Processing Units). This confluence of machine learning (ML) and cloud computing represents exciting opportunities for cloud and systems researchers. ML-assisted molecular dynamics simulations are a new class of workload, and exhibit unique computational patterns. These simulations present new challenges for low-cost and high-performance execution. We argue that transient cloud resources, such as low-cost preemptible cloud VMs, can be a viable platform for this new workload. Finally, we present some low-hanging fruits and long-term challenges in cloud resource management, and the integration of molecular dynamics simulations into ML platforms (such as TensorFlow). Prateek Sharma 0001, Vikram Jadhao |
CLOUD | 2 |
| 2020 | Modeling The Temporally Constrained Preemptions of Transient Cloud VMsabstractTransient cloud servers such as Amazon Spot instances, Google Preemptible VMs, and Azure Low-priority batch VMs, can reduce cloud computing costs by as much as 10x, but can be unilaterally preempted by the cloud provider. Understanding preemption characteristics (such as frequency) is a key first step in minimizing the effect of preemptions on application performance, availability, and cost. However, little is understood about temporally constrained preemptions---wherein preemptions must occur in a given time window. We study temporally constrained preemptions by conducting a large scale empirical study of Google's Preemptible VMs (that have a maximum lifetime of 24 hours), develop a new preemption probability model, new model-driven resource management policies, and implement them in a batch computing service for scientific computing workloads. Our statistical and experimental analysis indicates that temporally constrained preemptions are not uniformly distributed but are time-dependent and have a bathtub shape. We find that existing memoryless models and policies are not suitable for temporally constrained preemptions. We develop a new probability model for bathtub preemptions and analyze it through the lens of reliability theory. To highlight the effectiveness of our model, we develop optimized policies for job scheduling and checkpointing. Compared to existing techniques, our model-based policies can reduce the probability of job failure by more than 2x. We also implement our policies as part of a batch computing service for scientific computing applications, which reduces cost by 5x compared to conventional cloud deployments and keeps performance overheads under 3%. J. C. S. Kadupitige, Vikram Jadhao, Prateek Sharma 0001 |
HPDC | 2 |