Steiner Tree Packing (STP) is a notoriously hard problem in classical complexity theory, which is of practical relevance to VLSI circuit design. Previous research has approached this problem by providing heuristic or approximate algorithms. In this paper, we show the first FPT algorithms for STP parameterized by structural parameters of the input graph. In particular, we show that STP is fixed-parameter tractable by the tree-cut width as well as the fracture number of the input graph. To achieve our results, we generalize techniques from Edge-Disjoint Paths (EDP) to Generalized Steiner Tree Packing (GSTP), which generalizes both STP and EDP. First, we derive the notion of the augmented graph for GSTP analogous to EDP. We then show that GSTP is FPT by (1) the tree-cut width of the augmented graph, (2) the fracture number of the augmented graph, (3) the slim tree-cut width of the input graph. The latter two results were previously known for EDP; our results generalize these to GSTP and improve the running time for the parameter fracture number. On the other hand, it was open whether EDP is FPT parameterized by the tree-cut width of the augmented graph, despite extensive research on the structural complexity of the problem. We settle this question affirmatively.

The classic theorem of Gallai and Milgram (1960) generalizes several fundamental results in Graph Theory, such as Dilworth’s theorem on posets and Kőnig’s theorem on matchings in bipartite graphs. The theorem asserts that for every graph G, the vertex set of G can be partitioned into at most α(G) vertex-disjoint paths, where α(G) is the maximum size of an independent set in G. The proof of the Gallai-Milgram theorem is constructive and yields a polynomial-time algorithm that computes a covering of G by at most α(G) vertex-disjoint paths. While the Gallai-Milgram theorem is tight—there are graphs where one really needs α(G) paths, not fewer, to cover the vertex set of G—it was not known prior to our work whether deciding if a graph G could be covered by fewer than α(G) vertex-disjoint paths can be done in polynomial time. We resolve this question by proving the following algorithmic extension of the Gallai–Milgram theorem for undirected graphs: There is an algorithm that, for an n-vertex graph G and an integer parameter k ≥ 1, runs in time 22O(k4logk) · nO(1) and outputs a path cover P of G together with either a correct conclusion that P is a minimum-size path cover or an independent set of size |P| + k, certifying that P contains at most α(G) − k paths. Thus, for k ∈ O((loglogn)1/4−ε) our algorithm runs in polynomial time, and either computes a minimum-size path cover of G, or finds a path cover of size at most α(G) − k. We find the existence of such an algorithm quite surprising for the following reason. The problems of computing a path cover and a maximum independent set are both notoriously hard, yet our algorithm either solves one of them or provides meaningful information about the other. The proof of our algorithmic extension of the Gallai–Milgram theorem is non-trivial and builds on several novel algorithmic ideas. One of the key subroutines in our algorithm is an FPT algorithm, parameterized by α(G), for deciding whether G contains a Hamiltonian path. This result is of independent interest—prior to our work, no polynomial-time algorithm for deciding Hamiltonicity was known, even for graphs with independence number at most three. Moreover, the algorithmic techniques we develop apply to a wide array of problems in undirected graphs, including Hamiltonian Cycle, Path Cover, Largest Linkage, and Topological Minor Containment. We show that all these problems are FPT when parameterized by the independence number of the graph. Notably, the independence-number parameterization departs from the typical direction of research in parameterized complexity. First, α(G) measures a graph’s density, whereas most prior work in the area focuses on parameters describing sparsity, such as treewidth or vertex cover. Second, most structural parameters studied in parameterized complexity can be computed exactly or well-approximated in polynomial or even FPT time, whereas computing α(G) is notoriously difficult from almost any computational perspective. The fact that it can nevertheless serve as the basis for efficient parameterization is particularly striking.

Abstract Over the past decades, various metrics have emerged in graph theory to grasp the complex nature of network vulnerability. In this paper, we study two specific measures: (weighted) vertex integrity (wVI) and (weighted) component order connectivity (wCOC). These measures not only evaluate the number of vertices that need to be removed to decompose a graph into fragments, but also take into account the size of the largest remaining component. The main focus of our paper is on kernelization algorithms tailored to both measures. We capitalize on the structural attributes inherent in different crown decompositions, strategically combining them to introduce novel kernelization algorithms that advance the current state of the field. In particular, we extend the scope of the balanced crown decomposition provided by Casel et al. [1] and expand the applicability of crown decomposition techniques. In summary, we improve the vertex kernel of VI from $$p^3$$ to $$3p^2$$ , and of wVI from $$p^3$$ to $$3(p^2 + p^{1.5} p_\ell )$$ , where $$p_\ell < p$$ represents the weight of the heaviest component after removing a solution. For wCOC we improve the vertex kernel from $$\mathcal {O}(k^2W + kW^2)$$ to $$3\mu (k + \sqrt{\mu }W)$$ , where $$\mu = \max (k,W)$$ . We also give a combinatorial algorithm that provides a 2 kW vertex kernel in fixed-parameter tractable time when parameterized by r , where $$r \le k$$ is the size of a maximum $$(W+1)$$ -packing. We further show that the algorithm computing the 2 kW vertex kernel for COC can be transformed into a polynomial algorithm for two special cases, namely when $$W=1$$ , which corresponds to the well-known vertex cover problem, and for claw-free graphs. In particular, we show a new way to obtain a 2 k vertex kernel (or to obtain a 2-approximation) for the vertex cover problem by only using crown structures.

Cycle packing is a fundamental problem in optimization, graph theory, and algorithms. Motivated by recent advancements in finding vertex-disjoint paths between a specified set of vertices that either minimize the total length of the paths [Björklund and Husfeldt, ICALP 2014; Mari et al., SODA 2024] or request the paths to be shortest [Lochet, SODA 2021], we consider the following cycle packing problems: Min-Sum Cycle Packing and Shortest Cycle Packing . In Min-Sum Cycle Packing , we try to find, in a weighted undirected graph, \( k \) vertex-disjoint cycles of minimum total weight. Our first main result is an algorithm that, for any fixed \( k \) , solves the problem in polynomial time. We complement this result by establishing the W[1]-hardness of Min-Sum Cycle Packing parameterized by \( k \) . The same results hold for the version of the problem where the task is to find \( k \) edge-disjoint cycles. Our second main result concerns Shortest Cycle Packing , which is a special case of Min-Sum Cycle Packing that asks to find a packing of \( k \) shortest cycles in a graph. We prove this problem to be Fixed-Parameter Tractable (FPT) when parameterized by \( k \) on weighted planar graphs. We also obtain a polynomial kernel for the edge-disjoint variant of the problem on planar graphs. Whether Min-Sum Cycle Packing is FPT on planar graphs, or Shortest Cycle Packing on general graphs, remains open.

According to the classic Chvátal’s Lemma from 1977, a graph \( G \) of minimum degree \(\delta(G)\) contains every tree on \(\delta(G)+1\) vertices. Our main result is the following algorithmic “extension” of Chvátal’s Lemma: For any \( n \) -vertex graph \( G \) , an integer \( k \) , and a tree \( T \) on at most \(\delta(G)+k\) vertices, deciding whether \( G \) contains a subgraph isomorphic to \( T \) can be done in time \(f(k)\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}\) for some function \( f \) of \( k \) only. The proof is based on an intricate interplay between extremal graph theory and parameterized algorithms.

Covering and partitioning the edges of a graph into cliques are classical problems at the intersection of combinatorial optimization and graph theory, having been studied through a range of algorithmic and complexity-theoretic lenses. Despite the well-known fixed-parameter tractability of these problems when parameterized by the total number of cliques, such a parameterization often fails to be meaningful for sparse graphs. In many real-world instances, on the other hand, the minimum number of cliques in an edge cover or partition can be very close to the size of a maximum independent set α(G). Motivated by this observation, we investigate above αparameterizations of the edge clique cover and partition problems. Concretely, we introduce and study Edge Clique Cover Above Independent Set (ECC/α) and Edge Clique Partition Above Independent Set (ECP/α), where the goal is to cover or partition all edges of a graph using at most α(G) + k cliques, and k is the parameter. Our main results reveal a distinct complexity landscape for the two variants. We show that ECP/αis fixed-parameter tractable, whereas ECC/αis NP-complete for all k \geq 2, yet can be solved in polynomial time for k \in {0,1}. These findings highlight intriguing differences between the two problems when viewed through the lens of parameterization above a natural lower bound. Finally, we demonstrate that ECC/αbecomes fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by k + ω(G), where ω(G) is the size of a maximum clique of the graph G. This result is particularly relevant for sparse graphs, in which ωis typically small. For H-minor free graphs, we design a subexponential algorithm of running time f(H)^{\sqrt{k}}n^{O(1)}.

k-Center clustering is a fundamental classification problem, where the task is to categorize the given collection of entities into k clusters and come up with a representative for each cluster, so that the maximum distance between an entity and its representative is minimized. In this work, we focus on the setting where the entities are represented by binary vectors with missing entries, which model incomplete categorical data. This version of the problem has wide applications, from predictive analytics to bioinformatics. Our main finding is that the problem, which is notoriously hard from the classical complexity viewpoint, becomes tractable as soon as the known entries are sparse and exhibit a certain structure. Formally, we show fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for the parameters vertex cover, fracture number, and treewidth of the row-column graph, which encodes the positions of the known entries of the matrix. Additionally, we tie the complexity of the 1-cluster variant of the problem, which is famous under the name Closest String, to the complexity of solving integer linear programs with few constraints. This implies, in particular, that improving upon the running times of our algorithms would lead to more efficient algorithms for integer linear programming in general.

The Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP) is a popular generalization of the Traveling Salesperson Problem. Instead of one salesperson traversing the entire weighted, undirected graph G, there are k vehicles available to jointly cover the set of clients C ⊆ V(G). Every vehicle must start at one of the depot vertices D ⊆ V(G) and return to its start. Capacitated Vehicle Routing (CVRP) additionally restricts the route of each vehicle by limiting the number of clients it can cover, the distance it can travel, or both. In this work, we study the complexity of VRP and the three variants of CVRP for several parameterizations, in particular focusing on the treewidth of G. We present an FPT algorithm for VRP parameterized by treewidth. For CVRP, we prove paraNP- and W[⋅]-hardness for various parameterizations, including treewidth, thereby rendering the existence of FPT algorithms unlikely. In turn, we provide an XP algorithm for CVRP when parameterized by both treewidth and the vehicle capacity.

Cycle packing is a fundamental problem in optimization, graph theory, and algorithms. Motivated by recent advancements in finding vertex-disjoint paths between a specified set of vertices that either minimize the total length of the paths [Björklund, Husfeldt, ICALP 2014;

In Clique Cover, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, the task is to partition the vertices of $G$ into $k$ cliques. Clique Cover on unit ball graphs has a natural interpretation as a clustering problem, where the objective function is the maximum diameter of a cluster. Many classical NP-hard problems are known to admit $2^{O(n^{(1 - 1/d)})}$-time algorithms on unit ball graphs in $\mathbb{R}^d$ [de Berg et al., SIAM J. Comp 2018]. A notable exception is the Maximum Clique problem, which admits a polynomial-time algorithm on unit disk graphs and a subexponential algorithm on unit ball graphs in $\mathbb{R}^3$, but no subexponential algorithm on unit ball graphs in dimensions 4 or larger, assuming the ETH [Bonamy et al., JACM 2021]. In this work, we show that Clique Cover also suffers from a "curse of dimensionality", albeit in a significantly different way compared to Maximum Clique. We present a $2^{O(\sqrt{n})}$-time algorithm for unit disk graphs and argue that it is tight under the ETH. On the other hand, we show that Clique Cover does not admit a $2^{o(n)}$-time algorithm on unit ball graphs in dimension $5$, unless the ETH fails.

According to the classic Chvátal's Lemma from 1977, a graph of minimum degree δ(G) contains every tree on δ(G) + 1 vertices. Our main result is the following algorithmic “extension” of Chvátal's Lemma: For any n-vertex graph G, integer k, and a tree T on at most δ(G) + k vertices, deciding whether G contains a subgraph isomorphic to T, can be done in time f (k) · nO(1) for some function f of k only.

Abstract Parameterization above (or below) a guarantee is a successful concept in parameterized algorithms. The idea is that many computational problems admit “natural” guarantees bringing to algorithmic questions whether a better solution (above the guarantee) could be obtained efficiently. For example, for every boolean CNF formula on m clauses, there is an assignment that satisfies at least m/2 clauses. How difficult is it to decide whether there is an assignment satisfying more than $$m/2 +k$$ m / 2 + k clauses? Or, if an n-vertex graph has a perfect matching, then its vertex cover is at least n/2. Is there a vertex cover of size at least $$n/2 +k$$ n / 2 + k for some $$k\ge 1$$ k ≥ 1 and how difficult is it to find such a vertex cover? The above guarantee paradigm has led to several exciting discoveries in the areas of parameterized algorithms and kernelization. We argue that this paradigm could bring forth fresh perspectives on well-studied problems in approximation algorithms. Our example is the longest cycle problem. One of the oldest results in extremal combinatorics is the celebrated Dirac’s theorem from 1952. Dirac’s theorem provides the following guarantee on the length of the longest cycle: for every 2-connected n-vertex graph G with minimum degree $$\delta (G)\le n/2$$ δ ( G ) ≤ n / 2 , the length of a longest cycle L is at least $$2\delta (G)$$ 2 δ ( G ) . Thus the “essential” part in finding the longest cycle is in approximating the “offset” $$k = L - 2 \delta (G)$$ k = L - 2 δ ( G ) . The main result of this paper is the above-guarantee approximation theorem for k. Informally, the theorem says that approximating the offset k is not harder than approximating the total length L of a cycle. In other words, for any (reasonably well-behaved) function f, a polynomial time algorithm constructing a cycle of length f(L) in an undirected graph with a cycle of length L, yields a polynomial time algorithm constructing a cycle of length $$2\delta (G)+\Omega (f(k))$$ 2 δ ( G ) + Ω ( f ( k ) ) .

Fair clustering is a constrained clustering problem where we need to partition a set of colored points. The fraction of points of each color in every cluster should be more or less equal to the fraction of points of this color in the dataset. The problem was recently introduced by Chierichetti et al. [NeurIPS 2017]. We propose a new construction of coresets for fair clustering for Euclidean and general metrics based on random sampling. For the Euclidean space Rd, we provide the first coreset whose size does not depend exponentially on the dimension d. The question of whether such constructions exist was asked by Schmidt, Schwiegelshohn, and Sohler [WAOA 2019] and Huang, Jiang, and Vishnoi [NeurIPS 2019]. For general metrics, our construction provides the first coreset for fair clustering. New coresets appear to be a handy tool for designing better approximation and streaming algorithms for fair and other constrained clustering variants.

Abstract. In 1959, Erdős and Gallai proved that every graph [Formula: see text] with average vertex degree [Formula: see text] contains a cycle of length at least [Formula: see text]. We provide an algorithm that for [Formula: see text], in time [Formula: see text] decides whether a 2-connected [Formula: see text]-vertex graph [Formula: see text] contains a cycle of length at least [Formula: see text]. This resolves an open problem explicitly mentioned in several papers. The main ingredients of our algorithm are new graph-theoretical results interesting on their own.

We introduce a general method for obtaining fixed-parameter algorithms for problems about finding paths in undirected graphs, where the length of the path could be unbounded in the parameter. The first application of our method is as follows. We give a randomized algorithm, that given a colored \(n\) -vertex undirected graph, vertices \(s\) and \(t\) , and an integer \(k\) , finds an \((s,t)\) -path containing at least \(k\) different colors in time \(2^{k}n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}\) . This is the first FPT algorithm for this problem, and it generalizes the algorithm of Björklund, Husfeldt, and Taslaman on finding a path through \(k\) specified vertices. It also implies the first \(2^{k}n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}\) time algorithm for finding an \((s,t)\) -path of length at least \(k\) . Our method yields FPT algorithms for even more general problems. For example, we consider the problem where the input consists of an \(n\) -vertex undirected graph \(G\) , a matroid \(M\) whose elements correspond to the vertices of \(G\) and which is represented over a finite field of order \(q\) , a positive integer weight function on the vertices of \(G\) , two sets of vertices \(S,T\subseteq V(G)\) , and integers \(p,k,w\) , and the task is to find \(p\) vertex-disjoint paths from \(S\) to \(T\) so that the union of the vertices of these paths contains an independent set of \(M\) of cardinality \(k\) and weight \(w\) , while minimizing the sum of the lengths of the paths. We give a \(2^{p+\mathcal{O}(k^{2}\log(q+k))}n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}w\) time randomized algorithm for this problem.

The generic homomorphism problem, which asks whether an input graph \(G\) admits a homomorphism into a fixed target graph \(H\) , has been widely studied in the literature. In this article, we provide a fine-grained complexity classification of the running time of the homomorphism problem with respect to the clique-width of \(G\) (denoted \({\operatorname{cw}}\) ) for virtually all choices of \(H\) under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis. In particular, we identify a property of \(H\) called the signature number \(s(H)\) and show that for each \(H\) , the homomorphism problem can be solved in time \(\mathcal{O^{*}}(s(H)^{{\operatorname{cw}}})\) . Crucially, we then show that this algorithm can be used to obtain essentially tight upper bounds. Specifically, we provide a reduction that yields matching lower bounds for each \(H\) that is either a projective core or a graph admitting a factorization with additional properties—allowing us to cover all possible target graphs under long-standing conjectures.

Consider the following parameterized counting variation of the classic subset sum problem, which arises notably in the context of higher homotopy groups of topological spaces. Let v ∈ Q d be a rational vector, ( T 1 , T 2 … , T m ) a list of d × d rational matrices, S ∈ Q h × d a rational matrix not necessarily square and k a parameter. The goal is to compute the number of ways one can choose k matrices T i 1 , T i 2 , … , T i k from the list such that S T i k ⋯ T i 1 v = 0 ∈ Q h . In this paper, we show that this problem is # W [ 2 ] -hard for parameter k . As a consequence, computing the k -th homotopy group of a d -dimensional 1-connected topological space for d > 3 is # W [ 2 ] -hard for parameter k . We also discuss a decision version of the problem and its several modifications for which we show W [ 1 ] / W [ 2 ] -hardness. This is in contrast to the parameterized k -sum problem, which is only W [ 1 ] -hard (Abboud-Lewi-Williams, ESA'14). In addition, we show that the decision version of the problem without parameter is an undecidable problem, and we give a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm for matrices of bounded size over finite fields, parameterized by the matrix dimensions and the order of the field.

Microaggregation is a classical statistical disclosure control technique which requires the input data to be partitioned into clusters while adhering to specified size constraints. We provide novel exact algorithms and lower bounds for the task of microaggregating a given network while considering both unrestricted and connected clusterings, and analyze these from the perspective of the parameterized complexity paradigm. Altogether, our results assemble a complete complexity-theoretic picture for the network microaggregation problem with respect to the most natural parameterizations of the problem, including input-specified parameters capturing the size and homogeneity of the clusters as well as the treewidth and vertex cover number of the network.

Probably Approximately Correct (i.e., PAC) learning is a core concept of sample complexity theory, and efficient PAC learnability is often seen as a natural counterpart to the class P in classical computational complexity. But while the nascent theory of parameterized complexity has allowed us to push beyond the P-NP "dichotomy" in classical computational complexity and identify the exact boundaries of tractability for numerous problems, there is no analogue in the domain of sample complexity that could push beyond efficient PAC learnability. As our core contribution, we fill this gap by developing a theory of parameterized PAC learning which allows us to shed new light on several recent PAC learning results that incorporated elements of parameterized complexity. Within the theory, we identify not one but two notions of fixed-parameter learnability that both form distinct counterparts to the class FPT - the core concept at the center of the parameterized complexity paradigm - and develop the machinery required to exclude fixed-parameter learnability. We then showcase the applications of this theory to identify refined boundaries of tractability for CNF and DNF learning as well as for a range of learning problems on graphs.

Parameterization above (or below) a guarantee is a successful concept in parameterized algorithms. The idea is that many computational problems admit "natural" guarantees bringing to algorithmic questions whether a better solution (above the guarantee) could be obtained efficiently. For example, for every boolean CNF formula on m clauses, there is an assignment that satisfies at least m/2 clauses. How difficult is it to decide whether there is an assignment satisfying more than m/2 + k clauses? Or, if an n-vertex graph has a perfect matching, then its vertex cover is at least n/2. Is there a vertex cover of size at least n/2 + k for some k ≥ 1 and how difficult is it to find such a vertex cover? The above guarantee paradigm has led to several exciting discoveries in the areas of parameterized algorithms and kernelization. We argue that this paradigm could bring forth fresh perspectives on well-studied problems in approximation algorithms. Our example is the longest cycle problem. One of the oldest results in extremal combinatorics is the celebrated Dirac’s theorem from 1952. Dirac’s theorem provides the following guarantee on the length of the longest cycle: for every 2-connected n-vertex graph G with minimum degree δ(G) ≤ n/2, the length of the longest cycle L is at least 2δ(G). Thus the "essential" part of finding the longest cycle is in approximating the "offset" k = L - 2δ(G). The main result of this paper is the above-guarantee approximation theorem for k. Informally, the theorem says that approximating the offset k is not harder than approximating the total length L of a cycle. In other words, for any (reasonably well-behaved) function f, a polynomial time algorithm constructing a cycle of length f(L) in an undirected graph with a cycle of length L, yields a polynomial time algorithm constructing a cycle of length 2δ(G)+Ω(f(k)).

The problem of deciding whether a biconnected planar digraph $G=(V,E)$ can be augmented to become an $st$-planar graph by adding a set of oriented edges $E' \subseteq V \times V$ is known to be NP-complete. We show that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the size of the set $E'$.

Recently, Brand, Ganian and Simonov introduced a parameterized refinement of the classical PAC-learning sample complexity framework. A crucial outcome of their investigation is that for a very wide range of learning problems, there is a direct and provable correspondence between fixed-parameter PAC-learnability (in the sample complexity setting) and the fixed-parameter tractability of a corresponding "consistency checking" search problem (in the setting of computational complexity). The latter can be seen as generalizations of classical search problems where instead of receiving a single instance, one receives multiple yes- and no-examples and is tasked with finding a solution which is consistent with the provided examples. Apart from a few initial results, consistency checking problems are almost entirely unexplored from a parameterized complexity perspective. In this article, we provide an overview of these problems and their connection to parameterized sample complexity, with the primary aim of facilitating further research in this direction. Afterwards, we establish the fixed-parameter (in)-tractability for some of the arguably most natural consistency checking problems on graphs, and show that their complexity-theoretic behavior is surprisingly very different from that of classical decision problems. Our new results cover consistency checking variants of problems as diverse as (k-)Path, Matching, 2-Coloring, Independent Set and Dominating Set, among others.

We introduce a general method for obtaining fixed-parameter algorithms for problems about finding paths in undirected graphs, where the length of the path could be unbounded in the parameter. The first application of our method is a randomized algorithm, that given a colored n-vertex undirected graph, vertices s and t, and an integer k, finds an (s,t)-path containing at least k different colors in time 2kn

k-means and k-median clustering are powerful unsupervised machine learning techniques. However, due to complicated dependencies on all the features, it is challenging to interpret the resulting cluster assignments. Moshkovitz, Dasgupta, Rashtchian, and Frost proposed an elegant model of explainable k-means and k-median clustering in ICML 2020. In this model, a decision tree with k leaves provides a straightforward characterization of the data set into clusters. We study two natural algorithmic questions about explainable clustering. (1) For a given clustering, how to find the “best explanation” by using a decision tree with k leaves? (2) For a given set of points, how to find a decision tree with k leaves minimizing the k-means/median objective of the resulting explainable clustering? To address the first question, we introduce a new model of explainable clustering. Our model, inspired by the notion of outliers in robust statistics, is the following. We are seeking a small number of points (outliers) whose removal makes the existing clustering well-explainable. For addressing the second question, we initiate the study of the model of Moshkovitz et al. from the perspective of multivariate complexity. Our rigorous algorithmic analysis sheds some light on the influence of parameters like the input size, dimension of the data, the number of outliers, the number of clusters, and the approximation ratio, on the computational complexity of explainable clustering.

We study two “above guarantee” versions of the classical Longest Path problem on undirected and directed graphs and obtain the following results. In the first variant of Longest Path that we study, called Longest Detour, the task is to decide whether a graph has an (s,t)-path of length at least distG(s,t)+k. Bezáková et al. [7] proved that on undirected graphs the problem is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT). Our first main result establishes a connection between Longest Detour on directed graphs and 3- Disjoint Paths on directed graphs. Using these new insights, we design a 2O(k)⋅nO(1) time algorithm for the problem on directed planar graphs. Furthermore, the new approach yields a significantly faster FPT algorithm on undirected graphs. In the second variant of Longest Path, namely Longest Path above Diameter, the task is to decide whether the graph has a path of length at least diam(G)+k. We obtain dichotomy results about Longest Path above Diameter on undirected and directed graphs.

A k-core of a graph G is the maximal induced subgraph in which every vertex has degree at least k. In the Edge k-Core optimization problem, we are given a graph G and integers k, b and p. The task is to ensure that the k-core of G has at least p vertices, by adding at most b edges. While Edge k-Core is known to be computationally hard in general, we show that there are efficient algorithms when the k-core has to be constructed from a sparse graph with some structural properties. Our results are as follows. When the input graph is a forest, Edge k-Core is solvable in polynomial time. Edge k-Core is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) when parameterized by the minimum size of a vertex cover in the input graph. Edge k-Core is FPT when parameterized by the treewidth of the graph plus k.

Abstract In this work, we study the k-median clustering problem with an additional equal-size constraint on the clusters from the perspective of parameterized preprocessing. Our main result is the first lossy (2-approximate) polynomial kernel for this problem parameterized by the cost of clustering. We complement this result by establishing lower bounds for the problem that eliminate the existence of an (exact) kernel of polynomial size and a PTAS.

k-means and k-median clustering are powerful unsupervised machine learning techniques. However, due to complicated dependences on all the features, it is challenging to interpret the resulting cluster assignments. Moshkovitz, Dasgupta, Rashtchian, and Frost proposed an elegant model of explainable k-means and k-median clustering in ICML 2020. In this model, a decision tree with k leaves provides a straightforward characterization of the data set into clusters. We study two natural algorithmic questions about explainable clustering. (1) For a given clustering, how to find the ``best explanation'' by using a decision tree with k leaves? (2) For a given set of points, how to find a decision tree with k leaves minimizing the k-means/median objective of the resulting explainable clustering? To address the first question, we introduce a new model of explainable clustering. Our model, inspired by the notion of outliers in robust statistics, is the following. We are seeking a small number of points (outliers) whose removal makes the existing clustering well-explainable. For addressing the second question, we initiate the study of the model of Moshkovitz et al. from the perspective of multivariate complexity. Our rigorous algorithmic analysis sheds some light on the influence of parameters like the input size, dimension of the data, the number of outliers, the number of clusters, and the approximation ratio, on the computational complexity of explainable clustering.

We obtain new parameterized algorithms for the classical problem of determining whether a directed acyclic graph admits an upward planar drawing. Our results include a new fixed-parameter algorithm parameterized by the number of sources, an XP-algorithm parameterized by treewidth, and a fixed-parameter algorithm parameterized by treedepth. All three algorithms are obtained using a novel framework for the problem that combines SPQR tree-decompositions with parameterized techniques. Our approach unifies and pushes beyond previous tractability results for the problem on series-parallel digraphs, single-source digraphs and outerplanar digraphs.

In 1959, Erdős and Gallai proved that every graph G with average vertex degree ad(G)\geq 2 contains a cycle of length at least ad(G). We provide an algorithm that for k\geq 0 in time 2^{O(k)} n^{O(1)} decides whether a 2-connected n-vertex graph G contains a cycle of length at least ad(G)+k. This resolves an open problem explicitly mentioned in several papers. The main ingredients of our algorithm are new graph-theoretical results interesting on their own.

The generic homomorphism problem, which asks whether an input graph $G$ admits a homomorphism into a fixed target graph $H$, has been widely studied in the literature. In this article, we provide a fine-grained complexity classification of the running time of the homomorphism problem with respect to the clique-width of $G$ (denoted $\operatorname{cw}$) for virtually all choices of $H$ under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis. In particular, we identify a property of $H$ called the signature number $s(H)$ and show that for each $H$, the homomorphism problem can be solved in time $\mathcal{O}^*(s(H)^{\operatorname{cw}})$. Crucially, we then show that this algorithm can be used to obtain essentially tight upper bounds. Specifically, we provide a reduction that yields matching lower bounds for each $H$ that is either a projective core or a graph admitting a factorization with additional properties -- allowing us to cover all possible target graphs under long-standing conjectures.

In the area of data analysis and arguably even in machine learning as a whole, few approaches have been as impactful as the classical k-means clustering. Here, we study the complexity of k-means clustering in settings where most of the data is not known or simply irrelevant. To obtain a more fine-grained understanding of the tractability of this clustering problem, we apply the parameterized complexity paradigm and obtain three new algorithms for k-means clustering of incomplete data: one for the clustering of bounded-domain (i.e., integer) data, and two incomparable algorithms that target real-valued data. Our approach is based on exploiting structural properties of a graphical encoding of the missing entries, and we show that tractability can be achieved using significantly less restrictive parameterizations than in the complementary case of few missing entries.

There is a well-known approach to cope with NP-hard problems in practice: reduce the given problem to SAT or MAXSAT and run a SAT or a MaxSAT solver. This method is very efficient since SAT/MaxSAT solvers are extremely well-studied, as well as the complexity of these problems. At AAAI 2011, Li et al. proposed an alternative to this approach and suggested the Partial Minimum Satisfiability problem as a reduction target for NP-hard problems. They developed the MinSatz solver and showed that reducing to Partial Minimum Satisfiability and using MinSatz is in some cases more efficient than reductions to SAT or MaxSAT. Since then many results connected to the Partial Minimum Satisfiability problem were published. However, to the best of our knowledge, the worst-case complexity of Partial Minimum Satisfiability has not been studied up until now. Our goal is to fix the issue and show a O*((2-ɛ)^m) lower bound under the SETH assumption (here m is the total number of clauses), as well as several other lower bounds and parameterized exact algorithms with better-than-trivial running time.

In this paper, we consider the Minimum-Load k-Clustering/Facility Location (MLkC) problem where we are given a set P of n points in a metric space that we have to cluster and an integer k > 0 that denotes the number of clusters. Additionally, we are given a set F of cluster centers in the same metric space. The goal is to select a set C ⊆ F of k centers and assign each point in P to a center in C, such that the maximum load over all centers is minimized. Here the load of a center is the sum of the distances between it and the points assigned to it. Although clustering/facility location problems have rich literature, the minimum-load objective has not been studied substantially, and hence MLkC has remained a poorly understood problem. More interestingly, the problem is notoriously hard even in some special cases including the one in line metrics as shown by Ahmadian et al. [APPROX 2014, ACM Trans. Algorithms 2018]. They also show APX-hardness of the problem in the plane. On the other hand, the best-known approximation factor for MLkC is O(k), even in the plane. In this work, we study a fair version of MLkC inspired by the work of Chierichetti et al. [NeurIPS, 2017]. Here the input points are partitioned into 𝓁 protected groups, and only clusters that proportionally represent each group are allowed. MLkC is the special case with 𝓁 = 1. For the fair version, we are able to obtain a randomized 3-approximation algorithm in f(k,𝓁)⋅ n^O(1) time. Also, our scheme leads to an improved (1 + ε)-approximation in the case of Euclidean norm with the same running time (depending also linearly on the dimension d). Our results imply the same approximations for MLkC with running time f(k)⋅ n^O(1), achieving the first constant-factor FPT approximations for this problem in general and Euclidean metric spaces.

Bonnet et al. (FOCS 2020) introduced the graph invariant twin-width and showed that many NP-hard problems are tractable for graphs of bounded twin-width, generalizing similar results for other width measures, including treewidth and clique-width. In this paper, we investigate the use of twin-width for solving the propositional satisfiability problem (SAT) and propositional model counting. We particularly focus on Bounded-ones Weighted Model Counting (BWMC), which takes as input a CNF formula $F$ along with a bound $k$ and asks for the weighted sum of all models with at most $k$ positive literals. BWMC generalizes not only SAT but also (weighted) model counting. We develop the notion of "signed" twin-width of CNF formulas and establish that BWMC is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the certified signed twin-width of $F$ plus $k$. We show that this result is tight: it is neither possible to drop the bound $k$ nor use the vanilla twin-width instead if one wishes to retain fixed-parameter tractability, even for the easier problem SAT. Our theoretical results are complemented with an empirical evaluation and comparison of signed twin-width on various classes of CNF formulas.

In 1952, Dirac proved the following theorem about long cycles in graphs with large minimum vertex degrees: Every n-vertex 2-connected graph G with minimum vertex degree δ ≥ 2 contains a cycle with at least min{2δ, n} vertices. In particular, if δ ≥ n/2, then G is Hamiltonian. The proof of Dirac's theorem is constructive, and it yields an algorithm computing the corresponding cycle in polynomial time. The combinatorial bound of Dirac's theorem is tight in the following sense. There are 2-connected graphs that do not contain cycles of length more than 2δ + 1. Also, there are non-Hamiltonian graphs with all vertices but one of degree at least n/2. This prompts naturally to the following algorithmic questions. For k ≥ 1, (A) How difficult is to decide whether a 2-connected graph contains a cycle of length at least min{2δ + k, n}? (B) How difficult is to decide whether a graph G is Hamiltonian, when at least n–k vertices of G are of degrees at least n/2–k? The first question was asked by Fomin, Golovach, Lokshtanov, Panolan, Saurabh, and Zehavi. The second question is due to Jansen, Kozma, and Nederlof. Even for a very special case of k = 1, the existence of a polynomial-time algorithm deciding whether G contains a cycle of length at least min{2δ + 1, n} was open. We resolve both questions by proving the following algorithmic generalization of Dirac's theorem: If all but k vertices of a 2-connected graph G are of degree at least δ, then deciding whether G has a cycle of length at least min{2δ + k, n} can be done in time . The proof of the algorithmic generalization of Dirac's theorem builds on new graph-theoretical results that are interesting on their own.

We study two "above guarantee" versions of the classical Longest Path problem on undirected and directed graphs and obtain the following results. In the first variant of Longest Path that we study, called Longest Detour, the task is to decide whether a graph has an (s,t)-path of length at least dist_G(s,t)+k (where dist_G(s,t) denotes the length of a shortest path from s to t). Bez\'akov\'a et al. proved that on undirected graphs the problem is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) by providing an algorithm of running time 2^{O (k)} n. Further, they left the parameterized complexity of the problem on directed graphs open. Our first main result establishes a connection between Longest Detour on directed graphs and 3-Disjoint Paths on directed graphs. Using these new insights, we design a 2^{O(k)} n^{O(1)} time algorithm for the problem on directed planar graphs. Further, the new approach yields a significantly faster FPT algorithm on undirected graphs. In the second variant of Longest Path, namely Longest Path Above Diameter, the task is to decide whether the graph has a path of length at least diam(G)+k (diam(G) denotes the length of a longest shortest path in a graph G). We obtain dichotomy results about Longest Path Above Diameter on undirected and directed graphs. For (un)directed graphs, Longest Path Above Diameter is NP-complete even for k=1. However, if the input undirected graph is 2-connected, then the problem is FPT. On the other hand, for 2-connected directed graphs, we show that Longest Path Above Diameter is solvable in polynomial time for each k\in{1,\dots, 4} and is NP-complete for every k\geq 5. The parameterized complexity of Longest Path Above Diameter on general directed graphs remains an interesting open problem.

Fair clustering is a variant of constrained clustering where the goal is to partition a set of colored points. The fraction of points of each color in every cluster should be more or less equal to the fraction of points of this color in the dataset. This variant was recently introduced by Chierichetti et al. [NeurIPS 2017] and became widely popular. This paper proposes a new construction of coresets for fair k-means and k-median clustering for Euclidean and general metrics based on random sampling. For the Euclidean space ℝ^d, we provide the first coresets whose size does not depend exponentially on the dimension d. The question of whether such constructions exist was asked by Schmidt, Schwiegelshohn, and Sohler [WAOA 2019] and Huang, Jiang, and Vishnoi [NeurIPS 2019]. For general metric, our construction provides the first coreset for fair k-means and k-median. New coresets appear to be a handy tool for designing better approximation and streaming algorithms for fair and other constrained clustering variants. In particular, we obtain - the first fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) PTAS for fair k-means and k-median clustering in ℝ^d. The near-linear time of our PTAS improves over the previous scheme of Böhm, Fazzone, Leonardi, and Schwiegelshohn [ArXiv 2020] with running time n^{poly(k/ε)}; - FPT "true" constant-approximation for metric fair clustering. All previous algorithms for fair k-means and k-median in general metric are bicriteria and violate the fairness constraints; - FPT 3-approximation for lower-bounded k-median improving the best-known 3.736 factor of Bera, Chakrabarty, and Negahbani [ArXiv 2019]; - the first FPT constant-approximations for metric chromatic clustering and 𝓁-Diversity clustering; - near linear-time (in n) PTAS for capacitated and lower-bounded clustering improving over PTAS of Bhattacharya, Jaiswal, and Kumar [TOCS 2018] with super-quadratic running time; - a streaming (1+ε)-approximation for fair k-means and k-median of space complexity polynomial in k, d, ε and log{n} (the previous algorithms have exponential space complexity on either d or k).

PCA with Outliers is the fundamental problem of identifying an underlying low-dimensional subspace in a data set corrupted with outliers. A large body of work is devoted to the information-theoretic aspects of this problem. However, from the computational perspective, its complexity is still not well-understood. We study this problem from the perspective of parameterized complexity by investigating how parameters like the dimension of the data, the subspace dimension, the number of outliers and their structure, and approximation error, influence the computational complexity of the problem. Our algorithmic methods are based on techniques of randomized linear algebra and algebraic geometry.

We develop new algorithmic methods with provable guarantees for feature selection in regard to categorical data clustering. While feature selection is one of the most common approaches to reduce dimensionality in practice, most of the known feature selection methods are heuristics. We study the following mathematical model. We assume that there are some inadvertent (or undesirable) features of the input data that unnecessarily increase the cost of clustering. Consequently, we want to select a subset of the original features from the data such that there is a small-cost clustering on the selected features. More precisely, for given integers l (the number of irrelevant features) and k (the number of clusters), budget B, and a set of n categorical data points (represented by m-dimensional vectors whose elements belong to a finite set of values Σ), we want to select m-l relevant features such that the cost of any optimal k-clustering on these features does not exceed B. Here the cost of a cluster is the sum of Hamming distances (l0-distances) between the selected features of the elements of the cluster and its center. The clustering cost is the total sum of the costs of the clusters. We use the framework of parameterized complexity to identify how the complexity of the problem depends on parameters k, B, and |Σ|. Our main result is an algorithm that solves the Feature Selection problem in time f(k,B,|Σ|)⋅m^{g(k,|Σ|)}⋅n² for some functions f and g. In other words, the problem is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by B when |Σ| and k are constants. Our algorithm for Feature Selection is based on a solution to a more general problem, Constrained Clustering with Outliers. In this problem, we want to delete a certain number of outliers such that the remaining points could be clustered around centers satisfying specific constraints. One interesting fact about Constrained Clustering with Outliers is that besides Feature Selection, it encompasses many other fundamental problems regarding categorical data such as Robust Clustering, Binary and Boolean Low-rank Matrix Approximation with Outliers, and Binary Robust Projective Clustering. Thus as a byproduct of our theorem, we obtain algorithms for all these problems. We also complement our algorithmic findings with complexity lower bounds.

We consider a generalization of the fundamental k-means clustering for data with incomplete or corrupted entries. When data objects are represented by points in ℝd, a data point is said to be incomplete when some of its entries are missing or unspecified. An incomplete data point with at most Δ unspecified entries corresponds to an axis-parallel affine subspace of dimension at most Δ, called a Δ-point. Thus we seek a partition of n input Δ-points into k clusters minimizing the k-means objective. For Δ = 0, when all coordinates of each point are specified, this is the usual k-means clustering. We give an algorithm that finds an (1 + ∊)-approximate solution in time f(k, ∊, Δ) · n2 · d for some function f of k, ∊, and Δ only.

In k-Clustering we are given a multiset of n vectors X⊂Zd and a nonnegative number D, and we need to decide whether X can be partitioned into k clusters C1,…,Ck such that the cost∑i=1kminci∈Rd⁡∑x∈Ci‖x−ci‖pp≤D, where ‖⋅‖p is the Lp-norm. For p=2, k-Clustering is k-Means. We study k-Clustering from the perspective of parameterized complexity. The problem is known to be NP-hard for k=2 and also for d=2. It is a long-standing open question, whether the problem is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) for the combined parameter d+k. In this paper, we focus on the parameterization by D. We complement the known negative results by showing that for p=0 and p=∞, k-Clustering is W[1]-hard when parameterized by D. Interestingly, we discover a tractability island of k-Clustering: for every p∈(0,1], k-Clustering is solvable in time 2O(Dlog⁡D)(nd)O(1).

Gerrymandering is a practice of manipulating district boundaries and locations in order to achieve a political advantage for a particular party. Lewenberg, Lev, and Rosenschein [AAMAS 2017] initiated the algorithmic study of a geographically-based manipulation problem, where voters must vote at the ballot box closest to them. In this variant of gerrymandering, for a given set of possible locations of ballot boxes and known political preferences of n voters, the task is to identify locations for k boxes out of m possible locations to guarantee victory of a certain party in at least ℓ districts. Here integers k and ℓ are some selected parameter.It is known that the problem is NP-complete already for 4 political parties and prior to our work only heuristic algorithms for this problem were developed. We initiate the rigorous study of the gerrymandering problem from the perspectives of parameterized and fine-grained complexity and provide asymptotically matching lower and upper bounds on its computational complexity. We prove that the problem is W[1]-hard parameterized by k + n and that it does not admit an f(n,k) · mo(√k) algorithm for any function f of k and n only, unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. Our lower bounds hold already for 2 parties. On the other hand, we give an algorithm that solves the problem for a constant number of parties in time (m+n)O(√k).

We consider 𝓁₁-Rank-r Approximation over {GF}(2), where for a binary m× n matrix 𝐀 and a positive integer constant r, one seeks a binary matrix 𝐁 of rank at most r, minimizing the column-sum norm ‖ 𝐀 -𝐁‖₁. We show that for every ε ∈ (0, 1), there is a {randomized} (1+ε)-approximation algorithm for 𝓁₁-Rank-r Approximation over {GF}(2) of running time m^{O(1)}n^{O(2^{4r}⋅ ε^{-4})}. This is the first polynomial time approximation scheme (PTAS) for this problem.

A popular model to measure network stability is the k-core, that is the maximal induced subgraph in which every vertex has degree at least k. For example, k-cores are commonly used to model the unraveling phenomena in social networks. In this model, users having less than k connections within the network leave it, so the remaining users form exactly the k-core. In this paper we study the question of whether it is possible to make the network more robust by spending only a limited amount of resources on new connections. A mathematical model for the k-core construction problem is the following Edge k-Core optimization problem. We are given a graph G and integers k, b and p. The task is to ensure that the k-core of G has at least p vertices by adding at most b edges. The previous studies on Edge k-Core demonstrate that the problem is computationally challenging. In particular, it is NP-hard when k = 3, W[1]-hard when parameterized by k+b+p (Chitnis and Talmon, 2018), and APX-hard (Zhou et al, 2019). Nevertheless, we show that there are efficient algorithms with provable guarantee when the k-core has to be constructed from a sparse graph with some additional structural properties. Our results are - When the input graph is a forest, Edge k-Core is solvable in polynomial time; - Edge k-Core is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) when parameterized by the minimum size of a vertex cover in the input graph. On the other hand, with such parameterization, the problem does not admit a polynomial kernel subject to a widely-believed assumption from complexity theory; - Edge k-Core is FPT parameterized by the treewidth of the graph plus k. This improves upon a result of Chitnis and Talmon by not requiring b to be small. Each of our algorithms is built upon a new graph-theoretical result interesting in its own.

In k-Clustering we are given a multiset of n vectors X subset Z^d and a nonnegative number D, and we need to decide whether X can be partitioned into k clusters C_1, ..., C_k such that the cost sum_{i=1}^k min_{c_i in R^d} sum_{x in C_i} |x-c_i|_p^p <= D, where |*|_p is the Minkowski (L_p) norm of order p. For p=1, k-Clustering is the well-known k-Median. For p=2, the case of the Euclidean distance, k-Clustering is k-Means. We study k-Clustering from the perspective of parameterized complexity. The problem is known to be NP-hard for k=2 and it is also NP-hard for d=2. It is a long-standing open question, whether the problem is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) for the combined parameter d+k. In this paper, we focus on the parameterization by D. We complement the known negative results by showing that for p=0 and p=infty, k-Clustering is W1-hard when parameterized by D. Interestingly, the complexity landscape of the problem appears to be more intricate than expected. We discover a tractability island of k-Clustering: for every p in (0,1], k-Clustering is solvable in time 2^O(D log D) (nd)^O(1).

Principal component analysis (PCA) is one of the most fundamental procedures in exploratory data analysis and is the basic step in applications ranging from quantitative finance and bioinformatics to image analysis and neuroscience. However, it is well-documented that the applicability of PCA in many real scenarios could be constrained by an "immune deficiency" to outliers such as corrupted observations. We consider the following algorithmic question about the PCA with outliers. For a set of $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^{d}$, how to learn a subset of points, say 1% of the total number of points, such that the remaining part of the points is best fit into some unknown $r$-dimensional subspace? We provide a rigorous algorithmic analysis of the problem. We show that the problem is solvable in time $n^{O(d^2)}$. In particular, for constant dimension the problem is solvable in polynomial time. We complement the algorithmic result by the lower bound, showing that unless Exponential Time Hypothesis fails, in time $f(d)n^{o(d)}$, for any function $f$ of $d$, it is impossible not only to solve the problem exactly but even to approximate it within a constant factor.