Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yunbing Pang

dblp:236/7195 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 67% Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
circuit sizing
0.412019
Transistor-Level Optimization Methodology for GRM FPGA Interconnect Circuits · FPGA 2019
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs
FPGA routing architecture
0.412019
Transistor-Level Optimization Methodology for GRM FPGA Interconnect Circuits · FPGA 2019
Electronic design automation
physical design
0.412019
Transistor-Level Optimization Methodology for GRM FPGA Interconnect Circuits · FPGA 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulated annealing · 0.4multi-thread acceleration · 0.4minimum-final-delay algorithm · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Transistor-Level Optimization Methodology for GRM FPGA Interconnect Circuits
abstract
Due to its dominance in the whole chip area, power and delay, the FPGA interconnect circuits are traditionally designed by full custom design method. We present an automated transistor-level sizing optimization methodology for GRM FPGA interconnect circuits. In order to get accurate and effective predicated area, the commonly used diffusion sharing, transistor folding and inputs sharing are considered. To get the accurate and effective delay value, we avoid the inaccuracy of using linear device model, and use two schemes to build wire model: the wire within a circuit and the wire between interconnect circuits. To decrease simulation time, we propose multi-thread acceleration method and the Minimum-Final-Delay (MFD) algorithm which optimizes interconnect circuit as a whole, not separated part. For switch box optimization, MFD algorithm requires 38% less number of simulations than COFFE's algorithm. We use 65nm CMOS process technology for evaluation. For different optimization strategy, we emphasize either representative critical path delay or overall layout area. Compare to full-custom design method, the global cost can be decrease by 3% ~ 17%. For different transistor sizing combinations, 10/50 threads can be ~ 9X/15X faster than single-thread. Compared with the manual design method, our optimization methodology explores larger design space, and it decreases the circuit design optimization time from months to hours.
Zhengjie Li, Yuanlong Xiao, Yunbing Pang, Jian Wang 0036, Jinmei Lai 0001
FPGA4
2019 An Automatic Transistor-Level Tool for GRM FPGA Interconnect Circuits Optimization
abstract
Due to its dominance in FPGA area and delay, the interconnect circuit is traditionally designed and optimized in full customized fashion, which can be extremely time consuming. In this paper, we propose an automated transistor-level sizing optimization method for the widely-used General Routing Matrix FPGA interconnect circuits with the following three features: (1) an area model that takes into account the commonly used diffusion sharing, transistor folding and inputs sharing techniques in order to have an accurate area predication; (2) an accurate and effective non-linear delay model that treats the wire within a circuit and the wire between interconnect circuits separately; (3) a multi-thread acceleration method and the Minimum-Final-Delay algorithm to speed-up the simulation. The global optimization cost is measured by the product of the interconnect circuit area and the representative path delay based on our proposed models. The cost reduces 10.9%, when we use 65nm CMOS process chip for evaluation. The simulation time for different transistor sizing combinations is improved by 9X and 15X when 10 and 50 threads are used, respectively, faster than single-thread. Compared with the manual design method, our proposed optimization approach explores a larger design space and reduces the optimization time from months to hours.
Zhengjie Li, Yuanlong Xiao, Yunbing Pang, Jian Wang 0036, Jinmei Lai 0001
ACM Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI4