We present an empirical study of the relationship between map connectivity and the empirical hardness of the multi-agent pathfinding (MAPF) problem. By analyzing the second smallest eigenvalue (commonly known as lambda2) of the normalized Laplacian matrix of different maps, our initial study indicates that maps with smaller lambda2 tend to create more challenging instances when agents are generated uniformly randomly. Additionally, we introduce a map generator based on Quality Diversity (QD) that is capable of producing maps with specified lambda2 ranges, offering a possible way for generating challenging MAPF instances. Despite the absence of a strict monotonic correlation with lambda2 and the empirical hardness of MAPF, this study serves as a valuable initial investigation for gaining a deeper understanding of what makes a MAPF instance hard to solve.

Solving Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) problems optimally is known to be NP-Hard for both make-span and total arrival time minimization. Many algorithms have been developed to solve MAPF problems optimally and they all have different strengths and weaknesses. There is no dominating MAPF algorithm that works well in all types of problems and no standard guidelines for when to use which algorithm. Therefore, there is a need for developing an automatic algorithm selector that suggests the best optimal algorithm to use given a MAPF problem instance. We propose a model based on convolutions and inception modules by treating the input MAPF instance as an image. We further show that techniques such as single-agent shortest path annotation and graph embedding are very effective for improving training quality. We evaluate our model and show that it outperforms all individual algorithms in its portfolio, as well as an existing state-of-the-art MAPF algorithm selector.

Stackelberg security games are a critical tool for maximizing the utility of limited defense resources to protect important targets from an intelligent adversary. Motivated by green security, where the defender may only observe an adversary's response to defense on a limited set of targets, we study the problem of learning a defense that generalizes well to a new set of targets with novel feature values and combinations. Traditionally, this problem has been addressed via a two-stage approach where an adversary model is trained to maximize predictive accuracy without considering the defender's optimization problem. We develop an end-to-end game-focused approach, where the adversary model is trained to maximize a surrogate for the defender's expected utility. We show both in theory and experimental results that our game-focused approach achieves higher defender expected utility than the two-stage alternative when there is limited data.

Real-world applications often combine learning and optimization problems on graphs. For instance, our objective may be to cluster the graph in order to detect meaningful communities (or solve other common graph optimization problems such as facility location, maxcut, and so on). However, graphs or related attributes are often only partially observed, introducing learning problems such as link prediction which must be solved prior to optimization. Standard approaches treat learning and optimization entirely separately, while recent machine learning work aims to predict the optimal solution directly from the inputs. Here, we propose an alternative decision-focused learning approach that integrates a differentiable proxy for common graph optimization problems as a layer in learned systems. The main idea is to learn a representation that maps the original optimization problem onto a simpler proxy problem that can be efficiently differentiated through. Experimental results show that our ClusterNet system outperforms both pure end-to-end approaches (that directly predict the optimal solution) and standard approaches that entirely separate learning and optimization. Code for our system is available at https://github.com/bwilder0/clusternet.