Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrew J. Taylor

dblp:237/9477 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-5990-590XORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 60% Legged, aerial and field robots · 40%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › safe control
control barrier functions
0.512021
Multi-Layered Safety for Legged Robots via Control Barrier Functions and Model Predictive Control · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › locomotion
dynamic locomotion
0.512021
Multi-Layered Safety for Legged Robots via Control Barrier Functions and Model Predictive Control · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots
legged robot locomotion
0.512021
Multi-Layered Safety for Legged Robots via Control Barrier Functions and Model Predictive Control · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control
0.512021
Multi-Layered Safety for Legged Robots via Control Barrier Functions and Model Predictive Control · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.512021
Multi-Layered Safety for Legged Robots via Control Barrier Functions and Model Predictive Control · ICRA 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model predictive control · 0.5inverse dynamics tracking · 0.5control barrier functions · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Multi-Layered Safety for Legged Robots via Control Barrier Functions and Model Predictive Control
abstract
The problem of dynamic locomotion over rough terrain requires both accurate foot placement together with an emphasis on dynamic stability. Existing approaches to this problem prioritize immediate safe foot placement over longer term dynamic stability considerations, or relegate the coordination of foot placement and dynamic stability to heuristic methods. We propose a multi-layered locomotion framework that unifies Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) with Model Predictive Control (MPC) to simultaneously achieve safe foot placement and dynamic stability. Our approach incorporates CBF based safety constraints both in a low frequency kinodynamic MPC formulation and a high frequency inverse dynamics tracking controller. This ensures that safety-critical execution is considered when optimizing locomotion over a longer horizon. We validate the proposed method in a 3D stepping-stone scenario in simulation and experimentally on the ANYmal quadruped platform.
Ruben Grandia, Andrew J. Taylor, Aaron D. Ames, Marco Hutter 0001
ICRA2
2021 Measurement-Robust Control Barrier Functions: Certainty in Safety with Uncertainty in State
abstract
The increasing complexity of modern robotic systems and the environments they operate in necessitates the formal consideration of safety in the presence of imperfect measurements. In this paper we propose a rigorous framework for safety-critical control of systems with erroneous state estimates. We develop this framework by leveraging Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) and unifying the method of Backup Sets for synthesizing control invariant sets with robustness requirements—the end result is the synthesis of Measurement-Robust Control Barrier Functions (MR-CBFs). This provides theoretical guarantees on safe behavior in the presence of imperfect measurements and improved robustness over standard CBF approaches. We demonstrate the efficacy of this framework both in simulation and experimentally on a Segway platform using an onboard stereo-vision camera for state estimation.
Ryan K. Cosner, Andrew Singletary, Andrew J. Taylor, Tamás G. Molnár, Katherine L. Bouman, Aaron D. Ames
IROS3
2019 Episodic Learning with Control Lyapunov Functions for Uncertain Robotic Systems*
abstract
Many modern nonlinear control methods aim to endow systems with guaranteed properties, such as stability or safety, and have been successfully applied to the domain of robotics. However, model uncertainty remains a persistent challenge, weakening theoretical guarantees and causing implementation failures on physical systems. This paper develops a machine learning framework centered around Control Lyapunov Functions (CLFs) to adapt to parametric uncertainty and unmodeled dynamics in general robotic systems. Our proposed method proceeds by iteratively updating estimates of Lyapunov function derivatives and improving controllers, ultimately yielding a stabilizing quadratic program model-based controller. We validate our approach on a planar Segway simulation, demonstrating substantial performance improvements by iteratively refining on a base model-free controller.
Andrew J. Taylor, Victor D. Dorobantu, Hoang Minh Le 0002, Yisong Yue, Aaron D. Ames
IROS1