Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Gal Kaplun

dblp:237/9816 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Learning theory · 61% Deep learning architectures and training · 13% Optimization for machine learning · 9%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 75% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 25%

Topics — the 20 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
implicit bias
0.812024
Beyond Implicit Bias: The Insignificance of SGD Noise in Online Learning · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning
0.812024
Beyond Implicit Bias: The Insignificance of SGD Noise in Online Learning · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent
0.812024
Beyond Implicit Bias: The Insignificance of SGD Noise in Online Learning · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics
0.812024
Beyond Implicit Bias: The Insignificance of SGD Noise in Online Learning · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
distribution learning
0.712023
Deconstructing Distributions: A Pointwise Framework of Learning · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
conditional sampling
0.612022
Knowledge Distillation: Bad Models Can Be Good Role Models · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation
0.612022
Knowledge Distillation: Bad Models Can Be Good Role Models · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory
over-parameterization
0.612022
Knowledge Distillation: Bad Models Can Be Good Role Models · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.512021
For self-supervised learning, Rationality implies generalization, provably · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
generalization theory
0.512021
For self-supervised learning, Rationality implies generalization, provably · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › over-parameterization
double descent
0.412020
Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurt · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization
0.412019
SGD on Neural Networks Learns Functions of Increasing Complexity · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
over-parameterized regime
0.412019
SGD on Neural Networks Learns Functions of Increasing Complexity · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training optimization
stochastic gradient descent dynamics
0.412019
SGD on Neural Networks Learns Functions of Increasing Complexity · NeurIPS 2019
Graph algorithms and graph theory
diffusion model
0.412019
Robust Influence Maximization for Hyperparametric Models · ICML 2019
Graph algorithms and graph theory › network analysis › network diffusion
independent cascade model
0.412019
Robust Influence Maximization for Hyperparametric Models · ICML 2019
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
influence maximization
0.412019
Robust Influence Maximization for Hyperparametric Models · ICML 2019
Graph algorithms and graph theory › network analysis
social network analysis
0.412019
Robust Influence Maximization for Hyperparametric Models · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation
0.212023
Deconstructing Distributions: A Pointwise Framework of Learning · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.212022
Knowledge Distillation: Bad Models Can Be Good Role Models · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gradient descent · 0.8empirical analysis · 0.8pointwise analysis · 0.7nearest neighbour · 0.6kernel machines · 0.6sampling-based techniques · 0.4multiplicative weight update · 0.4linear classifier probing · 0.4conditional mutual information · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Beyond Implicit Bias: The Insignificance of SGD Noise in Online Learning
abstract
The success of SGD in deep learning has been ascribed by prior works to the *implicit bias* induced by finite batch sizes (''SGD noise''). While prior works focused on *offline learning* (i.e., multiple-epoch training), we study the impact of SGD noise on *online* (i.e., single epoch) learning. Through an extensive empirical analysis of image and language data, we demonstrate that small batch sizes do *not* confer any implicit bias advantages in online learning. In contrast to offline learning, the benefits of SGD noise in online learning are strictly computational, facilitating more cost-effective gradient steps. This suggests that SGD in the online regime can be construed as taking noisy steps along the ''golden path'' of the noiseless *gradient descent* algorithm. We study this hypothesis and provide supporting evidence in loss and function space. Our findings challenge the prevailing understanding of SGD and offer novel insights into its role in online learning.
Nikhil Vyas 0001, Depen Morwani, Rosie Zhao, Gal Kaplun, Sham M. Kakade, Boaz Barak
ICML4
2023 Deconstructing Distributions: A Pointwise Framework of Learning
Gal Kaplun, Nikhil Ghosh, Boaz Barak, Preetum Nakkiran
ICLR1
2022 Knowledge Distillation: Bad Models Can Be Good Role Models
abstract
Large neural networks trained in the overparameterized regime are able to fit noise to zero train error. Recent work of Nakkiran and Bansal has empirically observed that such networks behave as “conditional samplers” from the noisy distribution. That is, they replicate the noise in the train data to unseen examples. We give a theoretical framework for studying this conditional sampling behavior in the context of learning theory. We relate the notion of such samplers to knowledge distillation, where a student network imitates the outputs of a teacher on unlabeled data. We show that samplers, while being bad classifiers, can be good teachers. Concretely, we prove that distillation from samplers is guaranteed to produce a student which approximates the Bayes optimal classifier. Finally, we show that some common learning algorithms (e.g., Nearest-Neighbours and Kernel Machines) can often generate samplers when applied in the overparameterized regime.
Gal Kaplun, Eran Malach, Preetum Nakkiran, Shai Shalev-Shwartz
NeurIPS1
2021 For self-supervised learning, Rationality implies generalization, provably
Yamini Bansal, Gal Kaplun, Boaz Barak
ICLR2
2020 Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurt
Preetum Nakkiran, Gal Kaplun, Yamini Bansal, Tristan Yang, Boaz Barak, Ilya Sutskever
ICLR2
2019 Robust Influence Maximization for Hyperparametric Models
abstract
In this paper we study the problem of robust influence maximization in the independent cascade model under a hyperparametric assumption. In social networks users influence and are influenced by individuals with similar characteristics and as such they are associated with some features. A recent surging research direction in influence maximization focuses on the case where the edge probabilities on the graph are not arbitrary but are generated as a function of the features of the users and a global hyperparameter. We propose a model where the objective is to maximize the worst-case number of influenced users for any possible value of that hyperparameter. We provide theoretical results showing that proper robust solution in our model is NP-hard and an algorithm that achieves improper robust optimization. We make-use of sampling based techniques and of the renowned multiplicative weight updates algorithm. Additionally we validate our method empirically and prove that it outperforms the state-of-the-art robust influence maximization techniques.
Dimitris Kalimeris, Gal Kaplun, Yaron Singer
ICML2
2019 SGD on Neural Networks Learns Functions of Increasing Complexity
abstract
We perform an experimental study of the dynamics of Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) in learning deep neural networks for several real and synthetic classification tasks. We show that in the initial epochs, almost all of the performance improvement of the classifier obtained by SGD can be explained by a linear classifier. More generally, we give evidence for the hypothesis that, as iterations progress, SGD learns functions of increasing complexity. This hypothesis can be helpful in explaining why SGD-learned classifiers tend to generalize well even in the over-parameterized regime. We also show that the linear classifier learned in the initial stages is ``retained'' throughout the execution even if training is continued to the point of zero training error, and complement this with a theoretical result in a simplified model. Key to our work is a new measure of how well one classifier explains the performance of another, based on conditional mutual information.
Preetum Nakkiran, Gal Kaplun, Dimitris Kalimeris, Tristan Yang, Benjamin L. Edelman, Fred Zhang, Boaz Barak
NeurIPS2