VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Simon Vandenhende
dblp:237/9993
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-7000-7281ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 23% Segmentation and scene understanding · 14% Trustworthy machine learning · 10% |
Topics — the 21 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | Multi-Task Learning for Dense Prediction Tasks: A Survey · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 MTI-Net: Multi-scale Task Interaction Networks for Multi-task Learning · ECCV (4) 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
1.0 | 2 | 2021 | Revisiting Contrastive Methods for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations · NeurIPS 2021 Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation by Contrasting Object Mask Proposals · ICCV 2021 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.8 | 3 | 2021 | Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation by Contrasting Object Mask Proposals · ICCV 2021 Revisiting Contrastive Methods for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations · NeurIPS 2021 MTI-Net: Multi-scale Task Interaction Networks for Multi-task Learning · ECCV (4) 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training › unsupervised pre-training
contrastive pre-training |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Filtering, Distillation, and Hard Negatives for Vision-Language Pre-Training · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
data filtering |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Filtering, Distillation, and Hard Negatives for Vision-Language Pre-Training · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data curation
training data curation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Filtering, Distillation, and Hard Negatives for Vision-Language Pre-Training · CVPR 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language pretraining |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Filtering, Distillation, and Hard Negatives for Vision-Language Pre-Training · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Making Heads or Tails: Towards Semantically Consistent Visual Counterfactuals · ECCV (12) 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › counterfactual explanation
visual counterfactual explanation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Making Heads or Tails: Towards Semantically Consistent Visual Counterfactuals · ECCV (12) 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Revisiting Contrastive Methods for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations · NeurIPS 2021 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › annotation-efficient segmentation
unsupervised semantic segmentation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation by Contrasting Object Mask Proposals · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
visual representation learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Revisiting Contrastive Methods for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations · NeurIPS 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | SCAN: Learning to Classify Images Without Labels · ECCV (10) 2020 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification › label-efficient image classification
unsupervised image classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | SCAN: Learning to Classify Images Without Labels · ECCV (10) 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
unsupervised representation learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | SCAN: Learning to Classify Images Without Labels · ECCV (10) 2020 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-and-language navigation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Talk2Car: Taking Control of Your Self-Driving Car · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
dense prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Multi-Task Learning for Dense Prediction Tasks: A Survey · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Multi-Task Learning for Dense Prediction Tasks: A Survey · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
fine-grained image classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Making Heads or Tails: Towards Semantically Consistent Visual Counterfactuals · ECCV (12) 2022 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video instance segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Revisiting Contrastive Methods for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations · NeurIPS 2021 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception and planning |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Talk2Car: Taking Control of Your Self-Driving Car · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
contrastive learning · 2.1importance sampling · 0.7hard negative mining · 0.7concept distillation · 0.7shared representation learning · 0.6semantic part matching · 0.6optimization · 0.6nearest neighbor · 0.5k-means clustering · 0.5clustering · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Filtering, Distillation, and Hard Negatives for Vision-Language Pre-TrainingabstractVision-language models trained with contrastive learning on large-scale noisy data are becoming increasingly popular for zero-shot recognition problems. In this paper we improve the following three aspects of the contrastive pre-training pipeline: dataset noise, model initialization and the training objective. First, we propose a straightforward filtering strategy titled Complexity, Action, and Text-spotting (CAT) that significantly reduces dataset size, while achieving improved performance across zero-shot vision-language tasks. Next, we propose an approach titled Concept Distillation to leverage strong unimodal representations for contrastive training that does not increase training complexity while outperforming prior work. Finally, we modify the traditional contrastive alignment objective, and propose an importance-sampling approach to up-sample the importance of hard-negatives without adding additional complexity. On an extensive zero-shot benchmark of 29 tasks, our Distilled and Hard-negative Training (DiHT) approach improves on 20 tasks compared to the baseline. Furthermore, for few-shot linear probing, we propose a novel approach that bridges the gap between zero-shot and few-shot performance, substantially improving over prior work. Models are available at github.com/facebookresearch/diht. Filip Radenovic, Abhimanyu Dubey, Abhishek Kadian, Todor Mihaylov, Simon Vandenhende, Yi Wen 0006, Vignesh Ramanathan, Dhruv Mahajan 0001 |
CVPR | 5 |
| 2022 | Making Heads or Tails: Towards Semantically Consistent Visual CounterfactualsabstractA visual counterfactual explanation replaces image regions in a query image with regions from a distractor image such that the system’s decision on the transformed image changes to the distractor class. In this work, we present a novel framework for computing visual counterfactual explanations based on two key ideas. First, we enforce that the replaced and replacer regions contain the same semantic part, resulting in more semantically consistent explanations. Second, we use multiple distractor images in a computationally efficient way and obtain more discriminative explanations with fewer region replacements. Our approach is $$\mathbf {27\%}$$ more semantically consistent and an order of magnitude faster than a competing method on three fine-grained image recognition datasets. We highlight the utility of our counterfactuals over existing works through machine teaching experiments where we teach humans to classify different bird species. We also complement our explanations with the vocabulary of parts and attributes that contributed the most to the system’s decision. In this task as well, we obtain state-of-the-art results when using our counterfactual explanations relative to existing works, reinforcing the importance of semantically consistent explanations. Source code is available at github.com/facebookresearch/visual-counterfactuals . Simon Vandenhende, Dhruv Mahajan 0001, Filip Radenovic, Deepti Ghadiyaram |
ECCV (12) | 1 |
| 2022 | Multi-Task Learning for Dense Prediction Tasks: A SurveyabstractWith the advent of deep learning, many dense prediction tasks, i.e., tasks that produce pixel-level predictions, have seen significant performance improvements. The typical approach is to learn these tasks in isolation, that is, a separate neural network is trained for each individual task. Yet, recent multi-task learning (MTL) techniques have shown promising results w.r.t. performance, computations and/or memory footprint, by jointly tackling multiple tasks through a learned shared representation. In this survey, we provide a well-rounded view on state-of-the-art deep learning approaches for MTL in computer vision, explicitly emphasizing on dense prediction tasks. Our contributions concern the following. First, we consider MTL from a network architecture point-of-view. We include an extensive overview and discuss the advantages/disadvantages of recent popular MTL models. Second, we examine various optimization methods to tackle the joint learning of multiple tasks. We summarize the qualitative elements of these works and explore their commonalities and differences. Finally, we provide an extensive experimental evaluation across a variety of dense prediction benchmarks to examine the pros and cons of the different methods, including both architectural and optimization based strategies. Simon Vandenhende, Stamatios Georgoulis, Wouter Van Gansbeke, Marc Proesmans, Dengxin Dai, Luc Van Gool |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2021 | Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation by Contrasting Object Mask ProposalsabstractBeing able to learn dense semantic representations of images without supervision is an important problem in computer vision. However, despite its significance, this problem remains rather unexplored, with a few exceptions that considered unsupervised semantic segmentation on small-scale datasets with a narrow visual domain. In this paper, we make a first attempt to tackle the problem on datasets that have been traditionally utilized for the supervised case. To achieve this, we introduce a two-step framework that adopts a predetermined mid-level prior in a contrastive optimization objective to learn pixel embeddings. This marks a large deviation from existing works that relied on proxy tasks or end-to-end clustering. Additionally, we argue about the importance of having a prior that contains information about objects, or their parts, and discuss several possibilities to obtain such a prior in an unsupervised manner.Experimental evaluation shows that our method comes with key advantages over existing works. First, the learned pixel embeddings can be directly clustered in semantic groups using K-Means on PASCAL. Under the fully unsupervised setting, there is no precedent in solving the semantic segmentation task on such a challenging benchmark. Second, our representations can improve over strong baselines when transferred to new datasets, e.g. COCO and DAVIS. The code is available1. Wouter Van Gansbeke, Simon Vandenhende, Stamatios Georgoulis, Luc Van Gool |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2021 | Revisiting Contrastive Methods for Unsupervised Learning of Visual RepresentationsabstractContrastive self-supervised learning has outperformed supervised pretraining on many downstream tasks like segmentation and object detection. However, current methods are still primarily applied to curated datasets like ImageNet. In this paper, we first study how biases in the dataset affect existing methods. Our results show that an approach like MoCo works surprisingly well across: (i) object- versus scene-centric, (ii) uniform versus long-tailed and (iii) general versus domain-specific datasets. Second, given the generality of the approach, we try to realize further gains with minor modifications. We show that learning additional invariances - through the use of multi-scale cropping, stronger augmentations and nearest neighbors - improves the representations. Finally, we observe that MoCo learns spatially structured representations when trained with a multi-crop strategy. The representations can be used for semantic segment retrieval and video instance segmentation without finetuning. Moreover, the results are on par with specialized models. We hope this work will serve as a useful study for other researchers. Wouter Van Gansbeke, Simon Vandenhende, Stamatios Georgoulis, Luc Van Gool |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2020 | Branched Multi-Task Networks: Deciding what layers to share
Simon Vandenhende, Stamatios Georgoulis, Luc Van Gool, Bert De Brabandere |
BMVC | 1 |
| 2020 | SCAN: Learning to Classify Images Without Labels
Wouter Van Gansbeke, Simon Vandenhende, Stamatios Georgoulis, Marc Proesmans, Luc Van Gool |
ECCV (10) | 2 |
| 2020 | MTI-Net: Multi-scale Task Interaction Networks for Multi-task Learning
Simon Vandenhende, Stamatios Georgoulis, Luc Van Gool |
ECCV (4) | 1 |
| 2019 | Talk2Car: Taking Control of Your Self-Driving CarabstractThierry Deruyttere, Simon Vandenhende, Dusan Grujicic, Luc Van Gool, Marie-Francine Moens. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. Thierry Deruyttere, Simon Vandenhende, Dusan Grujicic, Luc Van Gool, Marie-Francine Moens |
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) | 2 |