Understanding cellular responses to chemical interventions is critical to the discovery of effective therapeutics. Because individual biological techniques often measure only one axis of cellular response at a time, high-quality multimodal datasets are needed to unlock a holistic understanding of how cells respond to treatments and to advance computational methods that integrate modalities. However, many techniques destroy cells and thus preclude paired measurements, and attempts to match disparate unimodal datasets are often confounded by data being generated in incompatible experimental settings. Here we introduce scGeneScope, a multimodal single‑cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and Cell Painting microscopy image dataset conditionally paired by chemical treatment, designed to facilitate the development and benchmarking of unimodal, multimodal, and multiple profile machine learning methods for cellular profiling. 28 chemicals, each acting on distinct biological pathways or mechanisms of action (MoAs), were applied to U2-OS cells in two experimental data generation rounds, creating paired sets of replicates that were then profiled independently by scRNA‑seq or Cell Painting. Using scGeneScope, we derive a replicate- and experiment-split treatment identification benchmark simulating MoA discovery under realistic laboratory variability conditions and evaluate unimodal, multimodal, and multiprofile models ranging in complexity from linear approaches to recent foundation models. Multiprofile integration improved performance in both the unimodal and multimodal settings, with gains more consistent in the former. Evaluation of unimodal models for MoA identification demonstrated that recent scRNA-seq foundation models deployed zero-shot were consistently outperformed by classic fit-to-data methods, underscoring the need for careful, realistic benchmarking in machine learning for biology. We release the scGeneScope dataset and benchmarking code to support further research.

Adversarial examples are often cited by neuroscientists and machine learning researchers as an example of how computational models diverge from biological sensory systems. Recent work has proposed adding biologically-inspired components to visual neural networks as a way to improve their adversarial robustness. One surprisingly effective component for reducing adversarial vulnerability is response stochasticity, like that exhibited by biological neurons. Here, using recently developed geometrical techniques from computational neuroscience, we investigate how adversarial perturbations influence the internal representations of standard, adversarially trained, and biologically-inspired stochastic networks. We find distinct geometric signatures for each type of network, revealing different mechanisms for achieving robust representations. Next, we generalize these results to the auditory domain, showing that neural stochasticity also makes auditory models more robust to adversarial perturbations. Geometric analysis of the stochastic networks reveals overlap between representations of clean and adversarially perturbed stimuli, and quantitatively demonstrate that competing geometric effects of stochasticity mediate a tradeoff between adversarial and clean performance. Our results shed light on the strategies of robust perception utilized by adversarially trained and stochastic networks, and help explain how stochasticity may be beneficial to machine and biological computation.

Current state-of-the-art object recognition models are largely based on convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures, which are loosely inspired by the primate visual system. However, these CNNs can be fooled by imperceptibly small, explicitly crafted perturbations, and struggle to recognize objects in corrupted images that are easily recognized by humans. Here, by making comparisons with primate neural data, we first observed that CNN models with a neural hidden layer that better matches primate primary visual cortex (V1) are also more robust to adversarial attacks. Inspired by this observation, we developed VOneNets, a new class of hybrid CNN vision models. Each VOneNet contains a fixed weight neural network front-end that simulates primate V1, called the VOneBlock, followed by a neural network back-end adapted from current CNN vision models. The VOneBlock is based on a classical neuroscientific model of V1: the linear-nonlinear-Poisson model, consisting of a biologically-constrained Gabor filter bank, simple and complex cell nonlinearities, and a V1 neuronal stochasticity generator. After training, VOneNets retain high ImageNet performance, but each is substantially more robust, outperforming the base CNNs and state-of-the-art methods by 18% and 3%, respectively, on a conglomerate benchmark of perturbations comprised of white box adversarial attacks and common image corruptions. Finally, we show that all components of the VOneBlock work in synergy to improve robustness. While current CNN architectures are arguably brain-inspired, the results presented here demonstrate that more precisely mimicking just one stage of the primate visual system leads to new gains in ImageNet-level computer vision applications.