Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Cian Eastwood
dblp:238/2792
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 5 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 37% Trustworthy machine learning · 28% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 13% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 21 heaviest of 23, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain generalization |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Spuriosity Didn't Kill the Classifier: Using Invariant Predictions to Harness Spurious Features · NeurIPS 2023 Probable Domain Generalization via Quantile Risk Minimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
disentangled representation learning |
1.0 | 2 | 2023 | DCI-ES: An Extended Disentanglement Framework with Connections to Identifiability · ICLR 2023 A Framework for the Quantitative Evaluation of Disentangled Representations · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › disentangled representation learning
disentanglement evaluation |
1.0 | 2 | 2023 | DCI-ES: An Extended Disentanglement Framework with Connections to Identifiability · ICLR 2023 A Framework for the Quantitative Evaluation of Disentangled Representations · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › sparse coding
dictionary learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards scientific discovery with dictionary learning: Extracting biological concepts from microscopy foundation models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards scientific discovery with dictionary learning: Extracting biological concepts from microscopy foundation models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
mechanistic interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards scientific discovery with dictionary learning: Extracting biological concepts from microscopy foundation models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › sparse coding › dictionary learning
sparse dictionary learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards scientific discovery with dictionary learning: Extracting biological concepts from microscopy foundation models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | GIVT: Generative Infinite-Vocabulary Transformers · ECCV (57) 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › causal representation learning
identifiability |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DCI-ES: An Extended Disentanglement Framework with Connections to Identifiability · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › causal machine learning
invariant prediction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Spuriosity Didn't Kill the Classifier: Using Invariant Predictions to Harness Spurious Features · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Spuriosity Didn't Kill the Classifier: Using Invariant Predictions to Harness Spurious Features · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › spurious correlation
spurious feature |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Spuriosity Didn't Kill the Classifier: Using Invariant Predictions to Harness Spurious Features · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › reconstruction-based representation learning
feature reconstruction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Source-Free Adaptation to Measurement Shift via Bottom-Up Feature Restoration · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Probable Domain Generalization via Quantile Risk Minimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
source-free domain adaptation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Source-Free Adaptation to Measurement Shift via Bottom-Up Feature Restoration · ICLR 2022 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › scene understanding
multi-view scene understanding |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning Object-Centric Representations of Multi-Object Scenes from Multiple Views · NeurIPS 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
novel view synthesis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning Object-Centric Representations of Multi-Object Scenes from Multiple Views · NeurIPS 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene modeling › scene representation
object-centric scene representation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning Object-Centric Representations of Multi-Object Scenes from Multiple Views · NeurIPS 2020 |
Medical and health informatics
medical imaging |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Towards scientific discovery with dictionary learning: Extracting biological concepts from microscopy foundation models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | GIVT: Generative Infinite-Vocabulary Transformers · ECCV (57) 2024 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
object segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Learning Object-Centric Representations of Multi-Object Scenes from Multiple Views · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sparse dictionary learning · 1.7PCA whitening · 1.7pseudo-labeling · 0.7invariant prediction · 0.7DCI framework · 0.7quantile risk minimization · 0.6feature restoration · 0.6empirical risk minimization · 0.6multi-view aggregation · 0.4iterative latent object representation updates · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Towards scientific discovery with dictionary learning: Extracting biological concepts from microscopy foundation modelsabstractSparse dictionary learning (DL) has emerged as a powerful approach to extract semantically meaningful concepts from the internals of large language models (LLMs) trained mainly in the text domain. In this work, we explore whether DL can extract meaningful concepts from less human-interpretable scientific data, such as vision foundation models trained on cell microscopy images, where limited prior knowledge exists about which high-level concepts should arise. We propose a novel combination of a sparse DL algorithm, Iterative Codebook Feature Learning (ICFL), with a PCA whitening pre-processing step derived from control data. Using this combined approach, we successfully retrieve biologically meaningful concepts, such as cell types and genetic perturbations. Moreover, we demonstrate how our method reveals subtle morphological changes arising from human-interpretable interventions, offering a promising new direction for scientific discovery via mechanistic interpretability in bioimaging. Konstantin Donhauser, Kristina Ulicna, Gemma E. Moran, Aditya Ravuri, Kian Kenyon-Dean, Cian Eastwood, Jason S. Hartford |
ICML | 6 |
| 2024 | GIVT: Generative Infinite-Vocabulary Transformers
Michael Tschannen, Cian Eastwood, Fabian Mentzer |
ECCV (57) | 2 |
| 2023 | DCI-ES: An Extended Disentanglement Framework with Connections to Identifiability
Cian Eastwood, Andrei Liviu Nicolicioiu, Julius von Kügelgen, Armin Kekic, Frederik Träuble, Andrea Dittadi, Bernhard Schölkopf |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | Spuriosity Didn't Kill the Classifier: Using Invariant Predictions to Harness Spurious FeaturesabstractTo avoid failures on out-of-distribution data, recent works have sought to extract features that have an invariant or stable relationship with the label across domains, discarding "spurious" or unstable features whose relationship with the label changes across domains. However, unstable features often carry complementary information that could boost performance if used correctly in the test domain. In this work, we show how this can be done without test-domain labels. In particular, we prove that pseudo-labels based on stable features provide sufficient guidance for doing so, provided that stable and unstable features are conditionally independent given the label. Based on this theoretical insight, we propose Stable Feature Boosting (SFB), an algorithm for: (i) learning a predictor that separates stable and conditionally-independent unstable features; and (ii) using the stable-feature predictions to adapt the unstable-feature predictions in the test domain. Theoretically, we prove that SFB can learn an asymptotically-optimal predictor without test-domain labels. Empirically, we demonstrate the effectiveness of SFB on real and synthetic data. Cian Eastwood, Shashank Singh 0011, Andrei Liviu Nicolicioiu, Marin Vlastelica Pogancic, Julius von Kügelgen, Bernhard Schölkopf |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Source-Free Adaptation to Measurement Shift via Bottom-Up Feature Restoration
Cian Eastwood, Ian Mason, Christopher K. I. Williams, Bernhard Schölkopf |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | Probable Domain Generalization via Quantile Risk MinimizationabstractDomain generalization (DG) seeks predictors which perform well on unseen test distributions by leveraging data drawn from multiple related training distributions or domains. To achieve this, DG is commonly formulated as an average- or worst-case problem over the set of possible domains. However, predictors that perform well on average lack robustness while predictors that perform well in the worst case tend to be overly-conservative. To address this, we propose a new probabilistic framework for DG where the goal is to learn predictors that perform well with high probability. Our key idea is that distribution shifts seen during training should inform us of probable shifts at test time, which we realize by explicitly relating training and test domains as draws from the same underlying meta-distribution. To achieve probable DG, we propose a new optimization problem called Quantile Risk Minimization (QRM). By minimizing the $\alpha$-quantile of predictor's risk distribution over domains, QRM seeks predictors that perform well with probability $\alpha$. To solve QRM in practice, we propose the Empirical QRM (EQRM) algorithm and provide: (i) a generalization bound for EQRM; and (ii) the conditions under which EQRM recovers the causal predictor as $\alpha \to 1$. In our experiments, we introduce a more holistic quantile-focused evaluation protocol for DG, and demonstrate that EQRM outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on datasets from WILDS and DomainBed. Cian Eastwood, Alexander Robey, Shashank Singh 0011, Julius von Kügelgen, Seyed Hamed Hassani, George J. Pappas, Bernhard Schölkopf |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Learning Object-Centric Representations of Multi-Object Scenes from Multiple ViewsabstractLearning object-centric representations of multi-object scenes is a promising approach towards machine intelligence, facilitating high-level reasoning and control from visual sensory data. However, current approaches for \textit{unsupervised object-centric scene representation} are incapable of aggregating information from multiple observations of a scene. As a result, these ``single-view'' methods form their representations of a 3D scene based only on a single 2D observation (view). Naturally, this leads to several inaccuracies, with these methods falling victim to single-view spatial ambiguities. To address this, we propose \textit{The Multi-View and Multi-Object Network (MulMON)}---a method for learning accurate, object-centric representations of multi-object scenes by leveraging multiple views. In order to sidestep the main technical difficulty of the \textit{multi-object-multi-view} scenario---maintaining object correspondences across views---MulMON iteratively updates the latent object representations for a scene over multiple views. To ensure that these iterative updates do indeed aggregate spatial information to form a complete 3D scene understanding, MulMON is asked to predict the appearance of the scene from novel viewpoints during training. Through experiments we show that MulMON better-resolves spatial ambiguities than single-view methods---learning more accurate and disentangled object representations---and also achieves new functionality in predicting object segmentations for novel viewpoints. Nanbo Li, Cian Eastwood, Robert B. Fisher |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2018 | A Framework for the Quantitative Evaluation of Disentangled Representations
Cian Eastwood, Christopher K. I. Williams |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |