VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Julian Feinauer
dblp:239/2755
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Storage systems · 94% Performance modeling and evaluation · 6% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Query processing and optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Storage systems › key-value storage
compaction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Separation or Not: On Handing Out-of-Order Time-Series Data in Leveled LSM-Tree · ICDE 2022 |
Storage systems
key-value storage |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Separation or Not: On Handing Out-of-Order Time-Series Data in Leveled LSM-Tree · ICDE 2022 |
Storage systems › key-value storage
LSM-tree |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Separation or Not: On Handing Out-of-Order Time-Series Data in Leveled LSM-Tree · ICDE 2022 |
Storage systems › flash and SSD › flash memory management › garbage collection
write amplification |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Separation or Not: On Handing Out-of-Order Time-Series Data in Leveled LSM-Tree · ICDE 2022 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
iot data management |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Apache IoTDB: Time-series database for Internet of Things · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
Storage systems › data management
time series database |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Apache IoTDB: Time-series database for Internet of Things · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
analytical modeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Separation or Not: On Handing Out-of-Order Time-Series Data in Leveled LSM-Tree · ICDE 2022 |
Storage systems › data management › database storage
time series storage |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Separation or Not: On Handing Out-of-Order Time-Series Data in Leveled LSM-Tree · ICDE 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sub-sequence similarity search · 1.3columnar file format · 1.3downsampling · 0.9workload analysis · 0.6analytical modeling · 0.6down-sampling · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Separation or Not: On Handing Out-of-Order Time-Series Data in Leveled LSM-TreeabstractLSM-Tree is widely adopted for storing time-series data in Internet of Things. According to conventional policy (denoted by$\pi_{c}$), when writing, the data will first be buffered in MemTable in memory. When it is full, the data will be written to the disk to form SSTables. Compaction is triggered to sort the data in each layer of the LSM-Tree on the disk. However, the arrival of data can be unordered due to reasons such as transition delay. Apache IoTDB uses in-order and out-of-order MemTables to separately buffer the in-order and out-of-order data to accelerate queries, namely the separation policy (denoted by$\pi_{s}$). However, given a specific space of memory budget to buffer the data, write amplification (WA) of the leveled LSM-Tree will be influenced by$\pi_{s}$. Whether the influence by separation is positive or negative, and how intense WA is influenced, depend on the properties of workloads and the capacity of the in-order and out-of-order MemTables. It is highly demanded to build robust models for estimating the expected amount of data rewritten in each compaction, and predicting the WA under$\pi_{c}$and$\pi_{s}$. Note that as an industrial paper, rather than proposing novel techniques for research problems, we focus on the practice of whether separating or not for lower write amplification. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets show that the models for estimating WA are accurate under various delay distributions. In addition, based on the estimation models, we implement an analyzer module in the open-source Apache IoTDB, for choosing the policy with lower WA. We apply the method in the use case of our industrial partner, a service provider of engineering machinery. The use case verifies the effectiveness of deciding whether separation or not by WA estimation. Yuyuan Kang, Xiangdong Huang 0001, Shaoxu Song, Lingzhe Zhang, Jialin Qiao, Chen Wang 0018, Jianmin Wang 0001, Julian Feinauer |
ICDE | 8 |
| 2020 | Apache IoTDB: Time-series database for Internet of ThingsabstractThe amount of time-series data that is generated has exploded due to the growing popularity of Internet of Things (IoT) devices and applications. These applications require efficient management of the time-series data on both the edge and cloud side that support high throughput ingestion, low latency query and advanced time series analysis. In this demonstration, we present Apache IoTDB managing time-series data to enable new classes of IoT applications. IoTDB has both edge and cloud versions, provides an optimized columnar file format for efficient time-series data storage, and time-series database with high ingestion rate, low latency queries and data analysis support. It is specially optimized for time-series oriented operations like aggregations query, down-sampling and sub-sequence similarity search. An edge-to-cloud time-series data management application is chosen to demonstrate how IoTDB handles time-series data in real-time and supports advanced analytics by integrating with Hadoop and Spark. An end-to-end IoT data management solution is shown by integrating IoTDB with PLC4x, Calcite, and Grafana. Chen Wang 0018, Xiangdong Huang 0001, Jialin Qiao, Lei Rui, Rong Kang, Julian Feinauer, Kevin Mcgrail, Peng Wang 0027, Diaohan Luo, Jianmin Wang 0001, Jia-Guang Sun 0001 |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 8 |