VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kaizhao Liang
dblp:239/5146
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
2as first author
8since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 2 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 35% Optimization for machine learning · 20% Trustworthy machine learning · 15% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 38% Memory systems · 38% Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 12% |
Topics — the 26 heaviest of 30, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
communication-efficient training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Communication Efficient Distributed Training with Distributed Lion · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
constrained optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Lion Secretly Solves a Constrained Optimization: As Lyapunov Predicts · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Lion Secretly Solves a Constrained Optimization: As Lyapunov Predicts · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Communication Efficient Distributed Training with Distributed Lion · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
low-rank training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Memory-Efficient LLM Training with Online Subspace Descent · NeurIPS 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
lyapunov stability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Lion Secretly Solves a Constrained Optimization: As Lyapunov Predicts · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
memory-efficient training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Memory-Efficient LLM Training with Online Subspace Descent · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal benchmark |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | MAPLM: A Real-World Large-Scale Vision-Language Benchmark for Map and Traffic Scene Understanding · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimization
optimizer design |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Communication Efficient Distributed Training with Distributed Lion · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
scene understanding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | MAPLM: A Real-World Large-Scale Vision-Language Benchmark for Map and Traffic Scene Understanding · CVPR 2024 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SambaNova SN40L: Scaling the AI Memory Wall with Dataflow and Composition of Experts · MICRO 2024 |
Memory systems
memory hierarchy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SambaNova SN40L: Scaling the AI Memory Wall with Dataflow and Composition of Experts · MICRO 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Unified Knowledge Distillation Framework for Deep Directed Graphical Models · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Unified Knowledge Distillation Framework for Deep Directed Graphical Models · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Unified Knowledge Distillation Framework for Deep Directed Graphical Models · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
sparse training |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Pixelated Butterfly: Simple and Efficient Sparse training for Neural Network Models · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial transferability |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Uncovering the Connections Between Adversarial Transferability and Knowledge Transferability · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Uncovering the Connections Between Adversarial Transferability and Knowledge Transferability · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial examples |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Unrestricted Adversarial Examples via Semantic Manipulation · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Unrestricted Adversarial Examples via Semantic Manipulation · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Adversarial Mutual Information for Text Generation · ICML 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Adversarial Mutual Information for Text Generation · ICML 2020 |
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs › reconfigurable computing
reconfigurable dataflow |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | SambaNova SN40L: Scaling the AI Memory Wall with Dataflow and Composition of Experts · MICRO 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | A Unified Knowledge Distillation Framework for Deep Directed Graphical Models · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning › federated knowledge transfer
federated distillation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | A Unified Knowledge Distillation Framework for Deep Directed Graphical Models · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | A Unified Knowledge Distillation Framework for Deep Directed Graphical Models · CVPR 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
visual instruction tuning · 0.8vicuna · 0.8streaming dataflow · 0.8singular value decomposition · 0.8sign momentum · 0.8online PCA · 0.8lyapunov function · 0.8hamiltonian descent · 0.8expert composition · 0.8decoupled weight decay · 0.8LLaMA-2 · 0.8CLIP · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | MAPLM: A Real-World Large-Scale Vision-Language Benchmark for Map and Traffic Scene UnderstandingabstractVision-language generative AI has demonstrated re-markable promise for empowering cross-modal scene understanding of autonomous driving and high-definition (HD) map systems. However, current benchmark datasets lack multi-modal point cloud, image, and language data pairs. Recent approaches utilize visual instruction learning and cross-modal prompt engineering to expand vision-language models into this domain. In this paper, we pro-pose a new vision-language benchmark that can be used to finetune traffic and HD map domain-specific foundation models. Specifically, we annotate and leverage large-scale, broad-coverage traffic and map data extracted from huge HD map annotations, and use CLIP and LLaMA-2 / Vi-cuna to finetune a baseline model with instruction-following data. Our experimental results across various algorithms reveal that while visual instruction-tuning large language models (LLMs) can effectively learn meaningful represen-tations from MAPLM-QA, there remains significant room for further advancements. To facilitate applying LLMs and multi-modal data into self-driving research, we will release our visual-language QA data, and the baseline models at GitHub.com/LLVM-AD/MAPLM. Yunsheng Ma, Wenqian Ye, Can Cui 0009, Zhipeng Cao 0002, Kaizhao Liang, Ziran Wang, James M. Rehg, Chao Zheng 0004 |
CVPR | 8 |
| 2024 | Lion Secretly Solves a Constrained Optimization: As Lyapunov PredictsabstractLion (Evolved Sign Momentum), a new optimizer discovered through program search, has shown promising results in training large AI models. It achieves results comparable to AdamW but with greater memory efficiency. As what we can expect from the result of the random search, Lion blends a number of elements from existing algorithms, including signed momentum, decoupled weight decay, Polayk and Nesterov momentum, but doesn't fit into any existing category of theoretically grounded optimizers. Thus, even though Lion appears to perform well as a general-purpose optimizer for a wide range of tasks, its theoretical basis remains uncertain. This absence of theoretical clarity limits opportunities to further enhance and expand Lion's efficacy. This work aims to demystify Lion. Using both continuous-time and discrete-time analysis, we demonstrate that Lion is a novel and theoretically grounded approach for minimizing a general loss function $f(x)$ while enforcing a bound constraint $||x||_\infty \leq 1/\lambda$. Lion achieves this through the incorporation of decoupled weight decay, where $\lambda$ represents the weight decay coefficient. Our analysis is facilitated by the development of a new Lyapunov function for the Lion updates. It applies to a wide range of Lion-$\phi$ algorithms, where the $sign(\cdot)$ operator in Lion is replaced by the subgradient of a convex function $\phi$, leading to the solution of the general composite optimization problem $\min_x f(x) + \phi^*(x)$. Our findings provide valuable insights into the dynamics of Lion and pave the way for further enhancements and extensions of Lion-related algorithms. Lizhang Chen, Bo Liu 0042, Kaizhao Liang, Qiang Liu 0001 |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2024 | SambaNova SN40L: Scaling the AI Memory Wall with Dataflow and Composition of ExpertsabstractMonolithic large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 have paved the way for modern generative AI applications. Training, serving, and maintaining monolithic LLMs at scale, however, remains prohibitively expensive and challenging. The disproportionate increase in compute-to-memory ratio of modern AI accelerators have created a memory wall, necessitating new methods to deploy AI. Recent research has shown that a composition of many smaller expert models, each with several orders of magnitude fewer parameters, can match or exceed the capabilities of monolithic LLMs. Composition of Experts (CoE) is a modular approach that lowers the cost and complexity of training and serving. However, this approach presents two key challenges when using conventional hardware: (1) without fused operations, smaller models have lower operational intensity, which makes high utilization more challenging to achieve; and (2) hosting a large number of models can be either prohibitively expensive or slow when dynamically switching between them. In this paper, we describe how combining CoE, streaming dataflow, and a three-tier memory system scales the AI memory wall. We describe Samba-CoE, a CoE system with 150 experts and a trillion total parameters. We deploy Samba-CoE on the SambaNova SN40L Reconfigurable Dataflow Unit (RDU) -a commercial dataflow accelerator architecture that has been codesigned for enterprise inference and training applications. The chip introduces a new three-tier memory system with on-chip distributed SRAM, on-package HBM, and off-package DDR DRAM. A dedicated inter-RDU network enables scaling up and out over multiple sockets. We demonstrate speedups ranging from 2× to 13× on various benchmarks running on eight RDU sockets compared with an unfused baseline. We show that for CoE inference deployments, the 8-socket RDU Node reduces machine footprint by up to 19 ×, speeds up model switching time by 15× to 31×, and achieves an overall speedup of 3.7× over a DGX H100 and 6.6× over a DGX A100. Raghu Prabhakar, Ram Sivaramakrishnan, Darshan Gandhi, Mingran Wang, Kejie Zhang, Tianren Gao, Angela Wang, Yongning Sheng, Joshua Brot, Denis Sokolov, Apurv Vivek, Calvin Leung, Arjun Sabnis, Jiayu Bai, Tuowen Zhao, Mark Gottscho, Mark Luttrell, Manish K. Shah, Zhengyu Chen 0002, Kaizhao Liang, Swayambhoo Jain, Urmish Thakker, Dawei Huang, Sumti Jairath, Kevin J. Brown, Kunle Olukotun |
MICRO | 24 |
| 2024 | Memory-Efficient LLM Training with Online Subspace DescentabstractRecently, a wide range of memory-efficient LLM training algorithms have gained substantial popularity. These methods leverage the low-rank structure of gradients to project optimizer states into a subspace using projection matrix found by singular value decomposition (SVD). However, convergence of these algorithms is highly dependent on the update rules of their projection matrix. In this work, we provide the \emph{first} convergence guarantee for arbitrary update rules of projection matrix. This guarantee is generally applicable to optimizers that can be analyzed with Hamiltonian Descent, including most common ones, such as LION, Adam. Inspired by our theoretical understanding, we propose Online Subspace Descent, a new family of subspace descent optimizer without SVD. Instead of updating projection matrix with eigenvectors, Online Subspace Descent updates projection matrix wtih online PCA. Online Subspace Descent is flexible and introduces only minimum overhead to training. We demonstrate that, for the task of pretraining LLaMA models ranging from 60M to 1B parameters on the C4 dataset, Online Subspace Descent achieves lower perplexity than state-of-the-art low-rank training methods across different settings and narrows the gap with full-rank baselines. Kaizhao Liang, Bo Liu 0042, Lizhang Chen, Qiang Liu 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Communication Efficient Distributed Training with Distributed LionabstractThe Lion optimizer has been a promising competitor with the AdamW for training large AI models, with advantages in memory, computation, and sample efficiency. In this paper, we introduce Distributed Lion, an innovative adaptation of Lion for distributed training environments. Leveraging the sign operator in Lion, our Distributed Lion only requires to communicate binary or lower-precision vectors
between workers to the center server, significantly reducing the communication cost.
Our theoretical analysis confirms Distributed Lion's convergence properties. Empirical results demonstrate its robustness across a range of tasks, worker counts, and batch sizes, on both vision and language problems. Notably, Distributed Lion attains comparable performance to standard Lion or AdamW optimizers applied on aggregated gradients, but with significantly reduced communication bandwidth. This feature is particularly advantageous for training large models. In addition, we also demonstrate that \mavolion{} presents a more favorable performance-bandwidth balance compared to existing efficient distributed methods such as deep gradient compression and ternary gradients. Bo Liu 0042, Lemeng Wu, Lizhang Chen, Kaizhao Liang, Jiaxu Zhu, Raghuraman Krishnamoorthi, Qiang Liu 0001 |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2023 | A Unified Knowledge Distillation Framework for Deep Directed Graphical ModelsabstractKnowledge distillation (KD) is a technique that transfers the knowledge from a large teacher network to a small student network. It has been widely applied to many different tasks, such as model compression and federated learning. However, existing KD methods fail to generalize to general deep directed graphical models (DGMs) with arbitrary layers of random variables. We refer by deep DGMs to DGMs whose conditional distributions are parameterized by deep neural networks. In this work, we propose a novel unified knowledge distillation framework for deep DGMs on various applications. Specifically, we leverage the reparameterization trick to hide the intermediate latent variables, resulting in a compact DGM. Then we develop a surrogate distillation loss to reduce error accumulation through multiple layers of random variables. Moreover, we present the connections between our method and some existing knowledge distillation approaches. The proposed framework is evaluated on four applications: data-free hierarchical variational autoencoder (VAE) compression, data-free variational recurrent neural networks (VRNN) compression, data-free Helmholtz Machine (HM) compression, and VAE continual learning. The results show that our distillation method out-performs the baselines in data-free model compression tasks. We further demonstrate that our method significantly improves the performance of KD-based continual learning for data generation. Our source code is available at https://github.com/YizhuoChen99/KD4DGM-CVPR. Yizhuo Chen, Kaizhao Liang, Zhe Zeng 0001, Shuochao Yao, Huajie Shao |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2022 | Pixelated Butterfly: Simple and Efficient Sparse training for Neural Network Models
Beidi Chen, Tri Dao, Kaizhao Liang, Zhao Song 0002, Atri Rudra, Christopher Ré |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2021 | Uncovering the Connections Between Adversarial Transferability and Knowledge TransferabilityabstractKnowledge transferability, or transfer learning, has been widely adopted to allow a pre-trained model in the source domain to be effectively adapted to downstream tasks in the target domain. It is thus important to explore and understand the factors affecting knowledge transferability. In this paper, as the first work, we analyze and demonstrate the connections between knowledge transferability and another important phenomenon–adversarial transferability, \emph{i.e.}, adversarial examples generated against one model can be transferred to attack other models. Our theoretical studies show that adversarial transferability indicates knowledge transferability, and vice versa. Moreover, based on the theoretical insights, we propose two practical adversarial transferability metrics to characterize this process, serving as bidirectional indicators between adversarial and knowledge transferability. We conduct extensive experiments for different scenarios on diverse datasets, showing a positive correlation between adversarial transferability and knowledge transferability. Our findings will shed light on future research about effective knowledge transfer learning and adversarial transferability analyses. Kaizhao Liang, Yibo Jacky Zhang, Boxin Wang, Oluwasanmi Koyejo, Bo Li 0026 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | Unrestricted Adversarial Examples via Semantic Manipulation
Anand Bhattad, Min Jin Chong, Kaizhao Liang, Bo Li 0026, David A. Forsyth |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2020 | Adversarial Mutual Information for Text GenerationabstractRecent advances in maximizing mutual information (MI) between the source and target have demonstrated its effectiveness in text generation. However, previous works paid little attention to modeling the backward network of MI (i.e., dependency from the target to the source), which is crucial to the tightness of the variational information maximization lower bound. In this paper, we propose Adversarial Mutual Information (AMI): a text generation framework which is formed as a novel saddle point (min-max) optimization aiming to identify joint interactions between the source and target. Within this framework, the forward and backward networks are able to iteratively promote or demote each other’s generated instances by comparing the real and synthetic data distributions. We also develop a latent noise sampling strategy that leverages random variations at the high-level semantic space to enhance the long term dependency in the generation process. Extensive experiments based on different text generation tasks demonstrate that the proposed AMI framework can significantly outperform several strong baselines, and we also show that AMI has potential to lead to a tighter lower bound of maximum mutual information for the variational information maximization problem. Boyuan Pan, Yazheng Yang, Kaizhao Liang, Bhavya Kailkhura, Zhongming Jin 0001, Xian-Sheng Hua 0001, Deng Cai 0001, Bo Li 0026 |
ICML | 3 |