Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jennifer Blase
dblp:239/5772
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data integration and cleaning · 77% Machine learning and data management · 23% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data integration and cleaning › data preprocessing
data cleaning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | CleanML: A Study for Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on ML Classification Tasks · ICDE 2021 |
Empirical software engineering › software engineering research methodology
empirical study |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | CleanML: A Study for Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on ML Classification Tasks · ICDE 2021 |
Machine learning and data management › data management for machine learning
data quality for machine learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | CleanML: A Study for Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on ML Classification Tasks · ICDE 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical hypothesis testing · 1.0false discovery rate control · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | CleanML: A Study for Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on ML Classification TasksabstractData quality affects machine learning (ML) model performances, and data scientists spend considerable amount of time on data cleaning before model training. However, to date, there does not exist a rigorous study on how exactly cleaning affects ML - ML community usually focuses on developing ML algorithms that are robust to some particular noise types of certain distributions, while database (DB) community has been mostly studying the problem of data cleaning alone without considering how data is consumed by downstream ML analytics.We propose a CleanML study that systematically investigates the impact of data cleaning on ML classification tasks. The open-source and extensible CleanML study currently includes 14 real-world datasets with real errors, five common error types, seven different ML models, and multiple cleaning algorithms for each error type (including both commonly used algorithms in practice as well as state-of-the-art solutions in academic literature). We control the randomness in ML experiments using statistical hypothesis testing, and we also control false discovery rate in our experiments using the Benjamini-Yekutieli (BY) procedure. We analyze the results in a systematic way to derive many interesting and nontrivial observations. We also put forward multiple research directions for researchers. Peng Li 0062, Xi Rao, Jennifer Blase, Xu Chu 0002, Ce Zhang 0001 |
ICDE | 3 |