Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jennifer Blase

dblp:239/5772 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data integration and cleaning · 77% Machine learning and data management · 23%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data integration and cleaning › data preprocessing
data cleaning
0.512021
CleanML: A Study for Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on ML Classification Tasks · ICDE 2021
Empirical software engineering › software engineering research methodology
empirical study
0.512021
CleanML: A Study for Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on ML Classification Tasks · ICDE 2021
Machine learning and data management › data management for machine learning
data quality for machine learning
0.112021
CleanML: A Study for Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on ML Classification Tasks · ICDE 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical hypothesis testing · 1.0false discovery rate control · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 CleanML: A Study for Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on ML Classification Tasks
abstract
Data quality affects machine learning (ML) model performances, and data scientists spend considerable amount of time on data cleaning before model training. However, to date, there does not exist a rigorous study on how exactly cleaning affects ML - ML community usually focuses on developing ML algorithms that are robust to some particular noise types of certain distributions, while database (DB) community has been mostly studying the problem of data cleaning alone without considering how data is consumed by downstream ML analytics.We propose a CleanML study that systematically investigates the impact of data cleaning on ML classification tasks. The open-source and extensible CleanML study currently includes 14 real-world datasets with real errors, five common error types, seven different ML models, and multiple cleaning algorithms for each error type (including both commonly used algorithms in practice as well as state-of-the-art solutions in academic literature). We control the randomness in ML experiments using statistical hypothesis testing, and we also control false discovery rate in our experiments using the Benjamini-Yekutieli (BY) procedure. We analyze the results in a systematic way to derive many interesting and nontrivial observations. We also put forward multiple research directions for researchers.
Peng Li 0062, Xi Rao, Jennifer Blase, Xu Chu 0002, Ce Zhang 0001
ICDE3