Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Volpp

dblp:239/6069 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-8303-4999ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 27% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 22% Trustworthy machine learning · 14%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
1.732023
Accurate Bayesian Meta-Learning by Accurate Task Posterior Inference · ICLR 2023
What Matters For Meta-Learning Vision Regression Tasks? · CVPR 2022
Meta-Learning Acquisition Functions for Transfer Learning in Bayesian Optimization · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference
0.712023
Beyond Deep Ensembles: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Bayesian Deep Learning under Distribution Shift · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models
bayesian deep learning
0.712023
Beyond Deep Ensembles: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Bayesian Deep Learning under Distribution Shift · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
bayesian meta-learning
0.712023
Accurate Bayesian Meta-Learning by Accurate Task Posterior Inference · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
calibration
0.712023
Beyond Deep Ensembles: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Bayesian Deep Learning under Distribution Shift · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
deep ensembles
0.712023
Beyond Deep Ensembles: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Bayesian Deep Learning under Distribution Shift · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift
0.712023
Beyond Deep Ensembles: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Bayesian Deep Learning under Distribution Shift · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.612022
What Matters For Meta-Learning Vision Regression Tasks? · CVPR 2022
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation
context aggregation
0.512021
Bayesian Context Aggregation for Neural Processes · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
neural processes
0.512021
Bayesian Context Aggregation for Neural Processes · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.412020
Meta-Learning Acquisition Functions for Transfer Learning in Bayesian Optimization · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization › policy gradient
deterministic policy gradient
0.412019
Trajectory-Based Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy reinforcement learning
0.412019
Trajectory-Based Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient
0.412019
Trajectory-Based Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning
0.212023
Beyond Deep Ensembles: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Bayesian Deep Learning under Distribution Shift · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › pre-training and adaptation
large-scale pre-trained models
0.212023
Beyond Deep Ensembles: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Bayesian Deep Learning under Distribution Shift · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
continuous control
0.112019
Trajectory-Based Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variational inference · 0.7task posterior inference · 0.7deep ensembles · 0.7SWAG · 0.7task augmentation · 0.6meta-regularization · 0.6data augmentation · 0.6conditional neural process · 0.6bayesian aggregation · 0.5acquisition function learning · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Accurate Bayesian Meta-Learning by Accurate Task Posterior Inference
Michael Volpp, Philipp Dahlinger, Philipp Becker, Christian Daniel, Gerhard Neumann
ICLR1
2023 Beyond Deep Ensembles: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Bayesian Deep Learning under Distribution Shift
abstract
Bayesian deep learning (BDL) is a promising approach to achieve well-calibrated predictions on distribution-shifted data. Nevertheless, there exists no large-scale survey that evaluates recent SOTA methods on diverse, realistic, and challenging benchmark tasks in a systematic manner. To provide a clear picture of the current state of BDL research, we evaluate modern BDL algorithms on real-world datasets from the WILDS collection containing challenging classification and regression tasks, with a focus on generalization capability and calibration under distribution shift. We compare the algorithms on a wide range of large, convolutional and transformer-based neural network architectures. In particular, we investigate a signed version of the expected calibration error that reveals whether the methods are over- or underconfident, providing further insight into the behavior of the methods. Further, we provide the first systematic evaluation of BDL for fine-tuning large pre-trained models, where training from scratch is prohibitively expensive. Finally, given the recent success of Deep Ensembles, we extend popular single-mode posterior approximations to multiple modes by the use of ensembles. While we find that ensembling single-mode approximations generally improves the generalization capability and calibration of the models by a significant margin, we also identify a failure mode of ensembles when finetuning large transformer-based language models. In this setting, variational inference based approaches such as last-layer Bayes By Backprop outperform other methods in terms of accuracy by a large margin, while modern approximate inference algorithms such as SWAG achieve the best calibration.
Florian Seligmann, Philipp Becker, Michael Volpp, Gerhard Neumann
NeurIPS3
2022 What Matters For Meta-Learning Vision Regression Tasks?
abstract
Meta-learning is widely used in few-shot classification and function regression due to its ability to quickly adapt to unseen tasks. However, it has not yet been well explored on regression tasks with high dimensional inputs such as images. This paper makes two main contributions that help understand this barely explored area. First, we design two new types of cross-category level vision regression tasks, namely object discovery and pose estimation of unprecedented complexity in the meta-learning domain for computer vision. To this end, we (i) exhaustively evaluate common meta-learning techniques on these tasks, and (ii) quantitatively analyze the effect of various deep learning techniques commonly used in recent meta-learning algorithms in order to strengthen the generalization capability: data augmentation, domain randomization, task augmentation and meta-regularization. Finally, we (iii) provide some insights and practical recommendations for training meta-learning algorithms on vision regression tasks. Second, we propose the addition of functional contrastive learning (FCL) over the task representations in Conditional Neural Processes (CNPs) and train in an end-to-end fashion. The experimental results show that the results of prior work are misleading as a consequence of a poor choice of the loss function as well as too small meta-training sets. Specifically, we find that CNPs outperform MAML on most tasks without fine-tuning. Furthermore, we observe that naive task augmentation without a tailored design results in underfitting.
Ning Gao 0005, Hanna Carolin Ziesche, Ngo Anh Vien, Michael Volpp, Gerhard Neumann
CVPR4
2021 Bayesian Context Aggregation for Neural Processes
Michael Volpp, Fabian Flürenbrock, Lukas Großberger, Christian Daniel, Gerhard Neumann
ICLR1
2020 Meta-Learning Acquisition Functions for Transfer Learning in Bayesian Optimization
Michael Volpp, Lukas P. Fröhlich, Kirsten Fischer, Andreas Doerr, Stefan Falkner, Frank Hutter, Christian Daniel
ICLR1
2019 Trajectory-Based Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Policy gradient methods are powerful reinforcement learning algorithms and have been demonstrated to solve many complex tasks. However, these methods are also data-inefficient, afflicted with high variance gradient estimates, and frequently get stuck in local optima. This work addresses these weaknesses by combining recent improvements in the reuse of off-policy data and exploration in parameter space with deterministic behavioral policies. The resulting objective is amenable to standard neural network optimization strategies like stochastic gradient descent or stochastic gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. Incorporation of previous rollouts via importance sampling greatly improves data-efficiency, whilst stochastic optimization schemes facilitate the escape from local optima. We evaluate the proposed approach on a series of continuous control benchmark tasks. The results show that the proposed algorithm is able to successfully and reliably learn solutions using fewer system interactions than standard policy gradient methods.
Andreas Doerr, Michael Volpp, Marc Toussaint, Sebastian Trimpe, Christian Daniel
ICML2