Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dustin Zelle

dblp:239/6070 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Graph learning · 67% Efficient and distributed learning · 15% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 13%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph inference › graph prediction
graph property prediction
0.712023
Learning Large Graph Property Prediction via Graph Segment Training · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
memory-efficient training
0.712023
Learning Large Graph Property Prediction via Graph Segment Training · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
heterogeneous graph neural network
0.612022
Zero-shot Transfer Learning within a Heterogeneous Graph via Knowledge Transfer Networks · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
zero-shot transfer
0.612022
Zero-shot Transfer Learning within a Heterogeneous Graph via Knowledge Transfer Networks · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph kernel
0.412019
DDGK: Learning Graph Representations for Deep Divergence Graph Kernels · WWW 2019
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning
0.412019
DDGK: Learning Graph Representations for Deep Divergence Graph Kernels · WWW 2019
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph analytics
graph similarity
0.412019
DDGK: Learning Graph Representations for Deep Divergence Graph Kernels · WWW 2019
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph representation learning
unsupervised graph representation learning
0.412019
DDGK: Learning Graph Representations for Deep Divergence Graph Kernels · WWW 2019
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.212023
Learning Large Graph Property Prediction via Graph Segment Training · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › embedding learning › temporal embedding
historical embedding
0.212023
Learning Large Graph Property Prediction via Graph Segment Training · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stale embedding dropout · 0.7divide-and-conquer training · 0.7knowledge transfer network · 0.6unsupervised learning · 0.4graph neural network · 0.4cross-graph attention · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Learning Large Graph Property Prediction via Graph Segment Training
abstract
Learning to predict properties of large graphs is challenging because each prediction requires the knowledge of an entire graph, while the amount of memory available during training is bounded. Here we propose Graph Segment Training (GST), a general framework that utilizes a divide-and-conquer approach to allow learning large graph property prediction with a constant memory footprint. GST first divides a large graph into segments and then backpropagates through only a few segments sampled per training iteration. We refine the GST paradigm by introducing a historical embedding table to efficiently obtain embeddings for segments not sampled for backpropagation. To mitigate the staleness of historical embeddings, we design two novel techniques. First, we finetune the prediction head to fix the input distribution shift. Second, we introduce Stale Embedding Dropout to drop some stale embeddings during training to reduce bias. We evaluate our complete method GST-EFD (with all the techniques together) on two large graph property prediction benchmarks: MalNet and TpuGraphs. Our experiments show that GST-EFD is both memory-efficient and fast, while offering a slight boost on test accuracy over a typical full graph training regime.
Kaidi Cao, Phitchaya Mangpo Phothilimthana, Sami Abu-El-Haija, Dustin Zelle, Yanqi Zhou, Charith Mendis, Jure Leskovec, Bryan Perozzi
NeurIPS4
2022 Zero-shot Transfer Learning within a Heterogeneous Graph via Knowledge Transfer Networks
abstract
Data continuously emitted from industrial ecosystems such as social or e-commerce platforms are commonly represented as heterogeneous graphs (HG) composed of multiple node/edge types. State-of-the-art graph learning methods for HGs known as heterogeneous graph neural networks (HGNNs) are applied to learn deep context-informed node representations. However, many HG datasets from industrial applications suffer from label imbalance between node types. As there is no direct way to learn using labels rooted at different node types, HGNNs have been applied to only a few node types with abundant labels. We propose a zero-shot transfer learning module for HGNNs called a Knowledge Transfer Network (KTN) that transfers knowledge from label-abundant node types to zero-labeled node types through rich relational information given in the HG. KTN is derived from the theoretical relationship, which we introduce in this work, between distinct feature extractors for each node type given in an HGNN model. KTN improves the performance of 6 different types of HGNN models by up to 960% for inference on zero-labeled node types and outperforms state-of-the-art transfer learning baselines by up to 73% across 18 different transfer learning tasks on HGs.
Minji Yoon, John Palowitch, Dustin Zelle, Ziniu Hu, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Bryan Perozzi
NeurIPS3
2019 DDGK: Learning Graph Representations for Deep Divergence Graph Kernels
abstract
Can neural networks learn to compare graphs without feature engineering? In this paper, we show that it is possible to learn representations for graph similarity with neither domain knowledge nor supervision (i.e. feature engineering or labeled graphs). We propose Deep Divergence Graph Kernels, an unsupervised method for learning representations over graphs that encodes a relaxed notion of graph isomorphism. Our method consists of three parts. First, we learn an encoder for each anchor graph to capture its structure. Second, for each pair of graphs, we train a cross-graph attention network which uses the node representations of an anchor graph to reconstruct another graph. This approach, which we call isomorphism attention, captures how well the representations of one graph can encode another. We use the attention-augmented encoder's predictions to define a divergence score for each pair of graphs. Finally, we construct an embedding space for all graphs using these pair-wise divergence scores.
Rami Al-Rfou, Bryan Perozzi, Dustin Zelle
WWW3