MOTIVATION: CATH is a protein domain classification resource that exploits an automated workflow of structure and sequence comparison alongside expert manual curation to construct a hierarchical classification of evolutionary and structural relationships. The aim of this study was to develop algorithms for detecting remote homologues missed by state-of-the-art hidden Markov model (HMM)-based approaches. The method developed (CATHe) combines a neural network with sequence representations obtained from protein language models. It was assessed using a dataset of remote homologues having less than 20% sequence identity to any domain in the training set. RESULTS: The CATHe models trained on 1773 largest and 50 largest CATH superfamilies had an accuracy of 85.6 ± 0.4% and 98.2 ± 0.3%, respectively. As a further test of the power of CATHe to detect more remote homologues missed by HMMs derived from CATH domains, we used a dataset consisting of protein domains that had annotations in Pfam, but not in CATH. By using highly reliable CATHe predictions (expected error rate <0.5%), we were able to provide CATH annotations for 4.62 million Pfam domains. For a subset of these domains from Homo sapiens, we structurally validated 90.86% of the predictions by comparing their corresponding AlphaFold2 structures with structures from the CATH superfamilies to which they were assigned. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code for the developed models is available on https://github.com/vam-sin/CATHe, and the datasets developed in this study can be accessed on https://zenodo.org/record/6327572. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

MOTIVATION: Classifying proteins into functional families can improve our understanding of protein function and can allow transferring annotations within one family. For this, functional families need to be 'pure', i.e., contain only proteins with identical function. Functional Families (FunFams) cluster proteins within CATH superfamilies into such groups of proteins sharing function. 11% of all FunFams (22 830 of 203 639) contain EC annotations and of those, 7% (1526 of 22 830) have inconsistent functional annotations. RESULTS: We propose an approach to further cluster FunFams into functionally more consistent sub-families by encoding their sequences through embeddings. These embeddings originate from language models transferring knowledge gained from predicting missing amino acids in a sequence (ProtBERT) and have been further optimized to distinguish between proteins belonging to the same or a different CATH superfamily (PB-Tucker). Using distances between embeddings and DBSCAN to cluster FunFams and identify outliers, doubled the number of pure clusters per FunFam compared to random clustering. Our approach was not limited to FunFams but also succeeded on families created using sequence similarity alone. Complementing EC annotations, we observed similar results for binding annotations. Thus, we expect an increased purity also for other aspects of function. Our results can help generating FunFams; the resulting clusters with improved functional consistency allow more reliable inference of annotations. We expect this approach to succeed equally for any other grouping of proteins by their phenotypes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code and embeddings are available via GitHub: https://github.com/Rostlab/FunFamsClustering. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

BACKGROUND: Sub-nuclear structures or locations are associated with various nuclear processes. Proteins localized in these substructures are important to understand the interior nuclear mechanisms. Despite advances in high-throughput methods, experimental protein annotations remain limited. Predictions of cellular compartments have become very accurate, largely at the expense of leaving out substructures inside the nucleus making a fine-grained analysis impossible. RESULTS: Here, we present a new method (LocNuclei) that predicts nuclear substructures from sequence alone. LocNuclei used a string-based Profile Kernel with Support Vector Machines (SVMs). It distinguishes sub-nuclear localization in 13 distinct substructures and distinguishes between nuclear proteins confined to the nucleus and those that are also native to other compartments (traveler proteins). High performance was achieved by implicitly leveraging a large biological knowledge-base in creating predictions by homology-based inference through BLAST. Using this approach, the performance reached AUC = 0.70-0.74 and Q13 = 59-65%. Travelling proteins (nucleus and other) were identified at Q2 = 70-74%. A Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of the enrichment of biological processes revealed that the predicted sub-nuclear compartments matched the expected functionality. Analysis of protein-protein interactions (PPI) show that formation of compartments and functionality of proteins in these compartments highly rely on interactions between proteins. This suggested that the LocNuclei predictions carry important information about function. The source code and data sets are available through GitHub: https://github.com/Rostlab/LocNuclei . CONCLUSIONS: LocNuclei predicts subnuclear compartments and traveler proteins accurately. These predictions carry important information about functionality and PPIs.

Following publication of the original article [1], the author reported that an incorrect figure has been published as Figure 2. The correct Figure 2 is shown below.

BACKGROUND: The CATH database provides a hierarchical classification of protein domain structures including a sub-classification of superfamilies into functional families (FunFams). We analyzed the similarity of binding site annotations in these FunFams and incorporated FunFams into the prediction of protein binding residues. RESULTS: FunFam members agreed, on average, in 36.9 ± 0.6% of their binding residue annotations. This constituted a 6.7-fold increase over randomly grouped proteins and a 1.2-fold increase (1.1-fold on the same dataset) over proteins with the same enzymatic function (identical Enzyme Commission, EC, number). Mapping de novo binding residue prediction methods (BindPredict-CCS, BindPredict-CC) onto FunFam resulted in consensus predictions for those residues that were aligned and predicted alike (binding/non-binding) within a FunFam. This simple consensus increased the F1-score (for binding) 1.5-fold over the original prediction method. Variation of the threshold for how many proteins in the consensus prediction had to agree provided a convenient control of accuracy/precision and coverage/recall, e.g. reaching a precision as high as 60.8 ± 0.4% for a stringent threshold. CONCLUSIONS: The FunFams outperformed even the carefully curated EC numbers in terms of agreement of binding site residues. Additionally, we assume that our proof-of-principle through the prediction of protein binding residues will be relevant for many other solutions profiting from FunFams to infer functional information at the residue level.