VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Amin Ghiasi
dblp:239/8313
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 49% Deep learning architectures and training · 23% Generative modeling · 22% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visual content generation and editing · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
1.0 | 2 | 2023 | Improving Robustness with Adaptive Weight Decay · NeurIPS 2023 Adversarial training for free! · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Stable Diffusion Models Are Secretly Good at Visual In-Context Learning · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 2 | 2020 | Adversarially robust transfer learning · ICLR 2020 Breaking Certified Defenses: Semantic Adversarial Examples with Spoofed robustness Certificates · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › latent diffusion model
stable diffusion |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Stable Diffusion Models Are Secretly Good at Visual In-Context Learning · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Improving Robustness with Adaptive Weight Decay · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Plug-In Inversion: Model-Agnostic Inversion for Vision with Data Augmentations · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy › privacy attack
model inversion |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Plug-In Inversion: Model-Agnostic Inversion for Vision with Data Augmentations · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | The Uncanny Similarity of Recurrence and Depth · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › adversarial transfer learning
adversarially robust transfer learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Adversarially robust transfer learning · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
certified defense |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Breaking Certified Defenses: Semantic Adversarial Examples with Spoofed robustness Certificates · ICLR 2020 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial example |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Breaking Certified Defenses: Semantic Adversarial Examples with Spoofed robustness Certificates · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Adversarial training for free! · NeurIPS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
diffusion model · 1.7adversarial training · 1.1spoofed robustness certificate · 0.9semantic adversarial example · 0.9weight decay · 0.7data augmentation · 0.6transfer learning · 0.4gradient recycling · 0.4PGD adversarial training · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Stable Diffusion Models Are Secretly Good at Visual In-Context Learning
Trevine Oorloff, Vishwanath A. Sindagi, Wele Gedara Chaminda Bandara, Ali Shafahi, Amin Ghiasi, Charan Prakash, Reza Ardekani |
ICCV | 5 |
| 2023 | Improving Robustness with Adaptive Weight DecayabstractWe propose adaptive weight decay, which automatically tunes the hyper-parameter for weight decay during each training iteration. For classification problems, we propose changing the value of the weight decay hyper-parameter on the fly based on the strength of updates from the classification loss (i.e., gradient of cross-entropy), and the regularization loss (i.e., $\ell_2$-norm of the weights). We show that this simple modification can result in large improvements in adversarial robustness — an area which suffers from robust overfitting — without requiring extra data accros various datasets and architecture choices. For example, our reformulation results in 20\% relative robustness improvement for CIFAR-100, and 10\% relative robustness improvement on CIFAR-10 comparing to the best tuned hyper-parameters of traditional weight decay resulting in models that have comparable performance to SOTA robustness methods. In addition, this method has other desirable properties, such as less sensitivity to learning rate, and smaller weight norms, which the latter contributes to robustness to overfitting to label noise, and pruning. Amin Ghiasi, Ali Shafahi, Reza Ardekani |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | The Uncanny Similarity of Recurrence and Depth
Avi Schwarzschild, Amin Ghiasi, Micah Goldblum, Tom Goldstein |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2022 | Plug-In Inversion: Model-Agnostic Inversion for Vision with Data AugmentationsabstractExisting techniques for model inversion typically rely on hard-to-tune regularizers, such as total variation or feature regularization, which must be individually calibrated for each network in order to produce adequate images. In this work, we introduce Plug-In Inversion, which relies on a simple set of augmentations and does not require excessive hyper-parameter tuning. Under our proposed augmentation-based scheme, the same set of augmentation hyper-parameters can be used for inverting a wide range of image classification models, regardless of input dimensions or the architecture. We illustrate the practicality of our approach by inverting Vision Transformers (ViTs) and Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs) trained on the ImageNet dataset, tasks which to the best of our knowledge have not been successfully accomplished by any previous works. Amin Ghiasi, Hamid Kazemi, Steven Reich, Chen Zhu 0001, Micah Goldblum, Tom Goldstein |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | Strong Data Augmentation Sanitizes Poisoning and Backdoor Attacks Without an Accuracy TradeoffabstractData poisoning and backdoor attacks manipulate victim models by maliciously modifying training data. In light of this growing threat, a recent survey of industry professionals revealed heightened fear in the private sector regarding data poisoning. Many previous defenses against poisoning either fail in the face of increasingly strong attacks, or they significantly degrade performance. However, we find that strong data augmentations, such as mixup and CutMix, can significantly diminish the threat of poisoning and backdoor attacks without trading off performance. We further verify the effectiveness of this simple defense against adaptive poisoning methods, and we compare to baselines including the popular differentially private SGD (DP-SGD) defense. In the context of backdoors, CutMix greatly mitigates the attack while simultaneously increasing validation accuracy by 9%. Eitan Borgnia, Valeriia Cherepanova, Liam Fowl, Amin Ghiasi, Jonas Geiping, Micah Goldblum, Tom Goldstein |
ICASSP | 4 |
| 2021 | Approximate Competitive Equilibrium with Generic Budget
Amin Ghiasi, Masoud Seddighin |
SAGT | 1 |
| 2020 | Breaking Certified Defenses: Semantic Adversarial Examples with Spoofed robustness Certificates
Amin Ghiasi, Ali Shafahi, Tom Goldstein |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2020 | Adversarially robust transfer learning
Ali Shafahi, Parsa Saadatpanah, Chen Zhu 0001, Amin Ghiasi, Christoph Studer, David Jacobs 0001, Tom Goldstein |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2019 | Batch-wise Logit-Similarity: Generalizing Logit-Squeezing and Label-Smoothing
Ali Shafahi, Amin Ghiasi, Mahyar Najibi, Furong Huang, John Dickerson 0001, Tom Goldstein |
BMVC | 2 |
| 2019 | Adversarial training for free!abstractAdversarial training, in which a network is trained on adversarial examples, is one of the few defenses against adversarial attacks that withstands strong attacks. Unfortunately, the high cost of generating strong adversarial examples makes standard adversarial training impractical on large-scale problems like ImageNet. We present an algorithm that eliminates the overhead cost of generating adversarial examples by recycling the gradient information computed when updating model parameters. Our "free" adversarial training algorithm achieves comparable robustness to PGD adversarial training on the CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 datasets at negligible additional cost compared to natural training, and can be 7 to 30 times faster than other strong adversarial training methods. Using a single workstation with 4 P100 GPUs and 2 days of runtime, we can train a robust model for the large-scale ImageNet classification task that maintains 40% accuracy against PGD attacks. Ali Shafahi, Mahyar Najibi, Amin Ghiasi, Zheng Xu 0002, John Dickerson 0001, Christoph Studer, Larry Davis 0001, Gavin Taylor, Tom Goldstein |
NeurIPS | 3 |