Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Amin Ghiasi

dblp:239/8313 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 49% Deep learning architectures and training · 23% Generative modeling · 22%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visual content generation and editing · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
1.022023
Improving Robustness with Adaptive Weight Decay · NeurIPS 2023
Adversarial training for free! · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
Stable Diffusion Models Are Secretly Good at Visual In-Context Learning · ICCV 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.922020
Adversarially robust transfer learning · ICLR 2020
Breaking Certified Defenses: Semantic Adversarial Examples with Spoofed robustness Certificates · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › latent diffusion model
stable diffusion
0.912025
Stable Diffusion Models Are Secretly Good at Visual In-Context Learning · ICCV 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization
0.712023
Improving Robustness with Adaptive Weight Decay · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.612022
Plug-In Inversion: Model-Agnostic Inversion for Vision with Data Augmentations · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy › privacy attack
model inversion
0.612022
Plug-In Inversion: Model-Agnostic Inversion for Vision with Data Augmentations · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network
0.612022
The Uncanny Similarity of Recurrence and Depth · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › adversarial transfer learning
adversarially robust transfer learning
0.412020
Adversarially robust transfer learning · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
certified defense
0.412020
Breaking Certified Defenses: Semantic Adversarial Examples with Spoofed robustness Certificates · ICLR 2020
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial example
0.412020
Breaking Certified Defenses: Semantic Adversarial Examples with Spoofed robustness Certificates · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training
0.412019
Adversarial training for free! · NeurIPS 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

diffusion model · 1.7adversarial training · 1.1spoofed robustness certificate · 0.9semantic adversarial example · 0.9weight decay · 0.7data augmentation · 0.6transfer learning · 0.4gradient recycling · 0.4PGD adversarial training · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Stable Diffusion Models Are Secretly Good at Visual In-Context Learning
Trevine Oorloff, Vishwanath A. Sindagi, Wele Gedara Chaminda Bandara, Ali Shafahi, Amin Ghiasi, Charan Prakash, Reza Ardekani
ICCV5
2023 Improving Robustness with Adaptive Weight Decay
abstract
We propose adaptive weight decay, which automatically tunes the hyper-parameter for weight decay during each training iteration. For classification problems, we propose changing the value of the weight decay hyper-parameter on the fly based on the strength of updates from the classification loss (i.e., gradient of cross-entropy), and the regularization loss (i.e., $\ell_2$-norm of the weights). We show that this simple modification can result in large improvements in adversarial robustness — an area which suffers from robust overfitting — without requiring extra data accros various datasets and architecture choices. For example, our reformulation results in 20\% relative robustness improvement for CIFAR-100, and 10\% relative robustness improvement on CIFAR-10 comparing to the best tuned hyper-parameters of traditional weight decay resulting in models that have comparable performance to SOTA robustness methods. In addition, this method has other desirable properties, such as less sensitivity to learning rate, and smaller weight norms, which the latter contributes to robustness to overfitting to label noise, and pruning.
Amin Ghiasi, Ali Shafahi, Reza Ardekani
NeurIPS1
2022 The Uncanny Similarity of Recurrence and Depth
Avi Schwarzschild, Amin Ghiasi, Micah Goldblum, Tom Goldstein
ICLR3
2022 Plug-In Inversion: Model-Agnostic Inversion for Vision with Data Augmentations
abstract
Existing techniques for model inversion typically rely on hard-to-tune regularizers, such as total variation or feature regularization, which must be individually calibrated for each network in order to produce adequate images. In this work, we introduce Plug-In Inversion, which relies on a simple set of augmentations and does not require excessive hyper-parameter tuning. Under our proposed augmentation-based scheme, the same set of augmentation hyper-parameters can be used for inverting a wide range of image classification models, regardless of input dimensions or the architecture. We illustrate the practicality of our approach by inverting Vision Transformers (ViTs) and Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs) trained on the ImageNet dataset, tasks which to the best of our knowledge have not been successfully accomplished by any previous works.
Amin Ghiasi, Hamid Kazemi, Steven Reich, Chen Zhu 0001, Micah Goldblum, Tom Goldstein
ICML1
2021 Strong Data Augmentation Sanitizes Poisoning and Backdoor Attacks Without an Accuracy Tradeoff
abstract
Data poisoning and backdoor attacks manipulate victim models by maliciously modifying training data. In light of this growing threat, a recent survey of industry professionals revealed heightened fear in the private sector regarding data poisoning. Many previous defenses against poisoning either fail in the face of increasingly strong attacks, or they significantly degrade performance. However, we find that strong data augmentations, such as mixup and CutMix, can significantly diminish the threat of poisoning and backdoor attacks without trading off performance. We further verify the effectiveness of this simple defense against adaptive poisoning methods, and we compare to baselines including the popular differentially private SGD (DP-SGD) defense. In the context of backdoors, CutMix greatly mitigates the attack while simultaneously increasing validation accuracy by 9%.
Eitan Borgnia, Valeriia Cherepanova, Liam Fowl, Amin Ghiasi, Jonas Geiping, Micah Goldblum, Tom Goldstein
ICASSP4
2021 Approximate Competitive Equilibrium with Generic Budget
Amin Ghiasi, Masoud Seddighin
SAGT1
2020 Breaking Certified Defenses: Semantic Adversarial Examples with Spoofed robustness Certificates
Amin Ghiasi, Ali Shafahi, Tom Goldstein
ICLR1
2020 Adversarially robust transfer learning
Ali Shafahi, Parsa Saadatpanah, Chen Zhu 0001, Amin Ghiasi, Christoph Studer, David Jacobs 0001, Tom Goldstein
ICLR4
2019 Batch-wise Logit-Similarity: Generalizing Logit-Squeezing and Label-Smoothing
Ali Shafahi, Amin Ghiasi, Mahyar Najibi, Furong Huang, John Dickerson 0001, Tom Goldstein
BMVC2
2019 Adversarial training for free!
abstract
Adversarial training, in which a network is trained on adversarial examples, is one of the few defenses against adversarial attacks that withstands strong attacks. Unfortunately, the high cost of generating strong adversarial examples makes standard adversarial training impractical on large-scale problems like ImageNet. We present an algorithm that eliminates the overhead cost of generating adversarial examples by recycling the gradient information computed when updating model parameters. Our "free" adversarial training algorithm achieves comparable robustness to PGD adversarial training on the CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 datasets at negligible additional cost compared to natural training, and can be 7 to 30 times faster than other strong adversarial training methods. Using a single workstation with 4 P100 GPUs and 2 days of runtime, we can train a robust model for the large-scale ImageNet classification task that maintains 40% accuracy against PGD attacks.
Ali Shafahi, Mahyar Najibi, Amin Ghiasi, Zheng Xu 0002, John Dickerson 0001, Christoph Studer, Larry Davis 0001, Gavin Taylor, Tom Goldstein
NeurIPS3