Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Philippe Casgrain
dblp:239/8790
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 42% Reinforcement learning · 29% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 21% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Optimizing Optimizers: Regret-optimal gradient descent algorithms · COLT 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Optimizing Optimizers: Regret-optimal gradient descent algorithms · COLT 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
gradient descent |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Optimizing Optimizers: Regret-optimal gradient descent algorithms · COLT 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
stochastic control |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Latent Variational Framework for Stochastic Optimization · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Latent Variational Framework for Stochastic Optimization · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Latent Variational Framework for Stochastic Optimization · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Latent Variational Framework for Stochastic Optimization · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Optimizing Optimizers: Regret-optimal gradient descent algorithms · COLT 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
regret minimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Optimizing Optimizers: Regret-optimal gradient descent algorithms · COLT 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
optimal control · 1.0first-order optimality conditions · 1.0stochastic control · 0.4forward-backward stochastic differential equations · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Optimizing Optimizers: Regret-optimal gradient descent algorithmsabstractThis paper treats the task of designing optimization algorithms as an optimal control problem. Using regret as a metric for an algorithm’s performance, we study the existence, uniqueness and consistency of regret-optimal algorithms. By providing first-order optimality conditions for the control problem, we show that regret-optimal algorithms must satisfy a specific structure in their dynamics which we show is equivalent to performing \emph{dual-preconditioned gradient descent} on the value function generated by its regret. Using these optimal dynamics, we provide bounds on their rates of convergence to solutions of convex optimization problems. Though closed-form optimal dynamics cannot be obtained in general, we present fast numerical methods for approximating them, generating optimization algorithms which directly optimize their long-term regret. These are benchmarked against commonly used optimization algorithms to demonstrate their effectiveness. Philippe Casgrain, Anastasis Kratsios |
COLT | 1 |
| 2019 | A Latent Variational Framework for Stochastic OptimizationabstractThis paper provides a unifying theoretical framework for stochastic optimization algorithms by means of a latent stochastic variational problem. Using techniques from stochastic control, the solution to the variational problem is shown to be equivalent to that of a Forward Backward Stochastic Differential Equation (FBSDE). By solving these equations, we recover a variety of existing adaptive stochastic gradient descent methods. This framework establishes a direct connection between stochastic optimization algorithms and a secondary latent inference problem on gradients, where a prior measure on gradient observations determines the resulting algorithm. Philippe Casgrain |
NeurIPS | 1 |