Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Steenhoff
dblp:24/10454
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 6
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioinformatics infrastructure
gene expression data management |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | inSilicoDb: an R/Bioconductor package for accessing human Affymetrix expert-curated datasets from GEO · Bioinform. 2011 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Batch effect removal methods for microarray gene expression data integration: a surveyabstractGenomic data integration is a key goal to be achieved towards large-scale genomic data analysis. This process is very challenging due to the diverse sources of information resulting from genomics experiments. In this work, we review methods designed to combine genomic data recorded from microarray gene expression (MAGE) experiments. It has been acknowledged that the main source of variation between different MAGE datasets is due to the so-called 'batch effects'. The methods reviewed here perform data integration by removing (or more precisely attempting to remove) the unwanted variation associated with batch effects. They are presented in a unified framework together with a wide range of evaluation tools, which are mandatory in assessing the efficiency and the quality of the data integration process. We provide a systematic description of the MAGE data integration methodology together with some basic recommendation to help the users in choosing the appropriate tools to integrate MAGE data for large-scale analysis; and also how to evaluate them from different perspectives in order to quantify their efficiency. All genomic data used in this study for illustration purposes were retrieved from InSilicoDB http://insilico.ulb.ac.be. Cosmin Lazar, Stijn Meganck, Jonatan Taminau, David Steenhoff, Alain Coletta, Colin Molter, David Y. Weiss Solís, Robin Duque, Hugues Bersini, Ann Nowé |
Briefings Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2013 | GENESHIFT: A Nonparametric Approach for Integrating Microarray Gene Expression Data Based on the Inner Product as a Distance Measure between the Distributions of GenesabstractThe potential of microarray gene expression (MAGE) data is only partially explored due to the limited number of samples in individual studies. This limitation can be surmounted by merging or integrating data sets originating from independent MAGE experiments, which are designed to study the same biological problem. However, this process is hindered by batch effects that are study-dependent and result in random data distortion; therefore numerical transformations are needed to render the integration of different data sets accurate and meaningful. Our contribution in this paper is two-fold. First we propose GENESHIFT, a new nonparametric batch effect removal method based on two key elements from statistics: empirical density estimation and the inner product as a distance measure between two probability density functions; second we introduce a new validation index of batch effect removal methods based on the observation that samples from two independent studies drawn from a same population should exhibit similar probability density functions. We evaluated and compared the GENESHIFT method with four other state-of-the-art methods for batch effect removal: Batch-mean centering, empirical Bayes or COMBAT, distance-weighted discrimination, and cross-platform normalization. Several validation indices providing complementary information about the efficiency of batch effect removal methods have been employed in our validation framework. The results show that none of the methods clearly outperforms the others. More than that, most of the methods used for comparison perform very well with respect to some validation indices while performing very poor with respect to others. GENESHIFT exhibits robust performances and its average rank is the highest among the average ranks of all methods used for comparison. Cosmin Lazar, Jonatan Taminau, Stijn Meganck, David Steenhoff, Alain Coletta, David Y. Weiss Solís, Colin Molter, Robin Duque, Hugues Bersini, Ann Nowé |
IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2012 | Local linear spectral unmixing via cluster analysis and non-negative matrix factorization for hyperspectral (CHRIS/PROBA) imageryabstractWe present a novel approach for spectral unmixing in hyperspectral imagery called local linear spectral unmixing (LLSU). Our new proposal relies on an existing strategy for non-linear data modelling where a general non-linear model is approximated via several piecewise linear models. The algorithm is the result of hybridizing two well-known strategies for exploratory high-dimensional data analysis: cluster analysis and non-negative matrix factorization. It has been proposed to answer the limitations of global linear unmixing models which are widely used for spectral unmixing. Our strategy is to first group similar pixels from the hyperspctral image via cluster analysis and then to consider a local linear unmixing model for each cluster in order to obtain the constituent endmembers. Subsequently, the resulted local endmembers from each cluster of mixed pixels are at their turn clustered based on their spectral similarity; the final solution is given by the clusters' centroids. Cosmin Lazar, Luca Demarchi, David Steenhoff, Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan, Ann Nowé, Hichem Sahli |
IGARSS | 3 |
| 2012 | Unlocking the potential of publicly available microarray data using inSilicoDb and inSilicoMerging R/Bioconductor packagesabstractBACKGROUND: With an abundant amount of microarray gene expression data sets available through public repositories, new possibilities lie in combining multiple existing data sets. In this new context, analysis itself is no longer the problem, but retrieving and consistently integrating all this data before delivering it to the wide variety of existing analysis tools becomes the new bottleneck. RESULTS: We present the newly released inSilicoMerging R/Bioconductor package which, together with the earlier released inSilicoDb R/Bioconductor package, allows consistent retrieval, integration and analysis of publicly available microarray gene expression data sets. Inside the inSilicoMerging package a set of five visual and six quantitative validation measures are available as well. CONCLUSIONS: By providing (i) access to uniformly curated and preprocessed data, (ii) a collection of techniques to remove the batch effects between data sets from different sources, and (iii) several validation tools enabling the inspection of the integration process, these packages enable researchers to fully explore the potential of combining gene expression data for downstream analysis. The power of using both packages is demonstrated by programmatically retrieving and integrating gene expression studies from the InSilico DB repository [https://insilicodb.org/app/]. Jonatan Taminau, Stijn Meganck, Cosmin Lazar, David Steenhoff, Alain Coletta, Colin Molter, Robin Duque, Virginie de Schaetzen, David Y. Weiss Solís, Hugues Bersini, Ann Nowé |
BMC Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2012 | A Survey on Filter Techniques for Feature Selection in Gene Expression Microarray AnalysisabstractA plenitude of feature selection (FS) methods is available in the literature, most of them rising as a need to analyze data of very high dimension, usually hundreds or thousands of variables. Such data sets are now available in various application areas like combinatorial chemistry, text mining, multivariate imaging, or bioinformatics. As a general accepted rule, these methods are grouped in filters, wrappers, and embedded methods. More recently, a new group of methods has been added in the general framework of FS: ensemble techniques. The focus in this survey is on filter feature selection methods for informative feature discovery in gene expression microarray (GEM) analysis, which is also known as differentially expressed genes (DEGs) discovery, gene prioritization, or biomarker discovery. We present them in a unified framework, using standardized notations in order to reveal their technical details and to highlight their common characteristics as well as their particularities. Cosmin Lazar, Jonatan Taminau, Stijn Meganck, David Steenhoff, Alain Coletta, Colin Molter, Virginie de Schaetzen, Robin Duque, Hugues Bersini, Ann Nowé |
IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2011 | inSilicoDb: an R/Bioconductor package for accessing human Affymetrix expert-curated datasets from GEOabstractAbstract Microarray technology has become an integral part of biomedical research and increasing amounts of datasets become available through public repositories. However, re-use of these datasets is severely hindered by unstructured, missing or incorrect biological samples information; as well as the wide variety of preprocessing methods in use. The inSilicoDb R/Bioconductor package is a command-line front-end to the InSilico DB, a web-based database currently containing 86 104 expert-curated human Affymetrix expression profiles compiled from 1937 GEO repository series. The use of this package builds on the Bioconductor project's focus on reproducibility by enabling a clear workflow in which not only analysis, but also the retrieval of verified data is supported. Availability: inSilicoDb is available as part of the Bioconductor project. There is a companion web interface that can be used for browsing available datasets before importing them into R/Bioconductor (http://insilico.ulb.ac.be). Contact: [email protected] Jonatan Taminau, David Steenhoff, Alain Coletta, Stijn Meganck, Cosmin Lazar, Virginie de Schaetzen, Robin Duque, Colin Molter, Hugues Bersini, Ann Nowé, David Y. Weiss Solís |
Bioinform. | 2 |