Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

John E. Moody

dblp:24/1421 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
25ranked-venue papers
12as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 20 · 9 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
12 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 26% Reinforcement learning · 19% Optimization for machine learning · 18%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
6 papers
Computational finance and economics · 94% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 6%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 21 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
smoothing regularizers
0.021996
Smoothing Regularizers for Projective Basis Function Networks · NIPS 1996
A Smoothing Regularizer for Recurrent Neural Networks · NIPS 1995
Computational finance and economics
algorithmic trading
0.021998
Reinforcement Learning for Trading Systems and Portfolios · KDD 1998
Reinforcement Learning for Trading · NIPS 1998
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning
0.011999
Constructing Heterogeneous Committees Using Input Feature Grouping: Application to Economic Forecasting · NIPS 1999
Computational finance and economics › economics
economic forecasting
0.011999
Constructing Heterogeneous Committees Using Input Feature Grouping: Application to Economic Forecasting · NIPS 1999
Data mining › dimensionality reduction
feature selection
0.011999
Data Visualization and Feature Selection: New Algorithms for Nongaussian Data · NIPS 1999
Computational finance and economics › algorithmic trading
reinforcement learning for trading
0.011998
Reinforcement Learning for Trading Systems and Portfolios · KDD 1998
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization
0.021991
Towards Faster Stochastic Gradient Search · NIPS 1991
Note on Learning Rate Schedules for Stochastic Optimization · NIPS 1990
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network
0.011995
A Smoothing Regularizer for Recurrent Neural Networks · NIPS 1995
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent
0.021992
Towards Faster Stochastic Gradient Search · NIPS 1991
Weight Space Probability Densities in Stochastic Learning: I. Dynamics and Equilibria · NIPS 1992
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.011993
Fast Pruning Using Principal Components · NIPS 1993
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning
0.011993
Fast Pruning Using Principal Components · NIPS 1993
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › game theory
equilibrium analysis
0.011992
Weight Space Probability Densities in Stochastic Learning: I. Dynamics and Equilibria · NIPS 1992
Machine learning › Learning theory
stochastic learning
0.011992
Weight Space Probability Densities in Stochastic Learning: I. Dynamics and Equilibria · NIPS 1992
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › architecture learning
architecture selection
0.011991
Principled Architecture Selection for Neural Networks: Application to Corporate Bond Rating Prediction · NIPS 1991
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis
0.011991
Towards Faster Stochastic Gradient Search · NIPS 1991
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory › statistical complexity
effective number of parameters
0.011991
The Effective Number of Parameters: An Analysis of Generalization and Regularization in Nonlinear Learning Systems · NIPS 1991
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization and regularization
0.011991
The Effective Number of Parameters: An Analysis of Generalization and Regularization in Nonlinear Learning Systems · NIPS 1991
Visualization and visual analytics
data visualization
0.011999
Data Visualization and Feature Selection: New Algorithms for Nongaussian Data · NIPS 1999
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
learning rate schedule
0.011990
Note on Learning Rate Schedules for Stochastic Optimization · NIPS 1990
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience
0.011989
Note on Development of Modularity in Simple Cortical Models · NIPS 1989
Emerging computing paradigms
neuromorphic computing
0.011989
Note on Development of Modularity in Simple Cortical Models · NIPS 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 0.1nongaussian data analysis · 0.0input feature grouping · 0.0committee construction · 0.0multi-effect decomposition · 0.0smoothing regularizer · 0.0principal component analysis · 0.0stochastic learning dynamics · 0.0stochastic gradient search · 0.0stochastic gradient descent · 0.0hierarchical learning · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Stock returns: momentum, volatility and interest rates
abstract
Various theories have been proposed to explain momentum in stock returns. We provide evidence in favor of risk-based explanations. Specifically, we construct self-financing market neutral portfolios that take long positions in past winners and short positions in past losers. We show that the return spreads between past winners and losers in the first year are driven primarily by high volatility stocks. Momentum investment strategies, which buy past winning stocks and sell past losing stocks, are significantly less profitable once we control for volatility. We also show that momentum profits appear to be associated with economic cycles as proxied by the prime rate. The momentum strategies are substantially stronger during expansions than during recessions. This is mainly due to the relatively poor performance of past losers (rather than superior performance of the past winners) during expansions.
Sakae Wada, John E. Moody
CIFEr3
2001 Learning to trade via direct reinforcement
abstract
We present methods for optimizing portfolios, asset allocations, and trading systems based on direct reinforcement (DR). In this approach, investment decision-making is viewed as a stochastic control problem, and strategies are discovered directly. We present an adaptive algorithm called recurrent reinforcement learning (RRL) for discovering investment policies. The need to build forecasting models is eliminated, and better trading performance is obtained. The direct reinforcement approach differs from dynamic programming and reinforcement algorithms such as TD-learning and Q-learning, which attempt to estimate a value function for the control problem. We find that the RRL direct reinforcement framework enables a simpler problem representation, avoids Bellman's curse of dimensionality and offers compelling advantages in efficiency. We demonstrate how direct reinforcement can be used to optimize risk-adjusted investment returns (including the differential Sharpe ratio), while accounting for the effects of transaction costs. In extensive simulation work using real financial data, we find that our approach based on RRL produces better trading strategies than systems utilizing Q-learning (a value function method). Real-world applications include an intra-daily currency trader and a monthly asset allocation system for the S&P 500 Stock Index and T-Bills.
John E. Moody, Matthew Saffell
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks1
1999 Constructing Heterogeneous Committees Using Input Feature Grouping: Application to Economic Forecasting
Yuansong Liao, John E. Moody
NIPS2
1999 Data Visualization and Feature Selection: New Algorithms for Nongaussian Data
Howard Hua Yang, John E. Moody
NIPS2
1998 Reinforcement Learning for Trading Systems and Portfolios
John E. Moody, Matthew Saffell
KDD1
1998 Reinforcement Learning for Trading
John E. Moody, Matthew Saffell
NIPS1
1997 What is the "true price"? state space models for high frequency FX data
abstract
In previous work, we have found statistically significant structures in tick-by-tick interbank foreign exchange (FX) price series on various time scales. These structures include negative autocorrelations in successive tick-by-tick returns and positive autocorrelations (trends) on longer time scales. To account for the observed structures, we propose state space models for financial time series in which the observed price is a noisy version of an unobserved, less-noisy "true price" process. The "true prices" in our models are stochastic processes with short-term, long-term, or multi-scale memory structures. The processes we consider include random walks, random trends, and fractional Brownian motions. For fractional Brownian motion processes, we represent the multi-scale correlational structures using self-similar wavelet decompositions. We estimate the state space model parameters using the Kalman filter and EM algorithms. Since both the observational noise and the changes in the true price series have non-gaussian distributions, the Kalman filter and EM algorithms are not able to completely separate the observational noise from the true price components. To improve this separation, we perform a neural-network-based independent component analysis (ICA) using algorithms developed for the blind separation of signals. Statistical analysis of our true price models supports our assertion that the estimated true prices are significantly different from the observed prices, and that significant non-random structures may exist in the FX markets.
John E. Moody, Lizhong Wu
CIFEr1
1997 Optimization of trading systems and portfolios
abstract
We propose to train trading systems and portfolios by optimizing objective functions that directly measure trading and investment performance. Rather than basing a trading system on forecasts or training via a supervised learning algorithm using labelled trading data, we train our systems using recurrent reinforcement learning algorithms. The objective functions that we consider as evaluation functions for reinforcement learning are profit or wealth, economic utility, the Sharpe ratio, and our proposed Differential Sharpe Ratio. The trading and portfolio management systems require prior decisions as input in order to properly take into account the effects of transactions costs, market impact, and taxes. This temporal dependence on system state requires the use of reinforcement versions of standard recurrent learning algorithms. We present empirical results in controlled experiments that demonstrate the efficacy of some of our methods. We find that maximizing the differential Sharpe ratio yields more consistent results than maximizing profits, and that both methods outperform a trading system based on forecasts that minimize MSE.
John E. Moody, Lizhong Wu
CIFEr1
1996 Smoothing Regularizers for Projective Basis Function Networks
John E. Moody, Thorsteinn S. Rögnvaldsson
NIPS1
1996 Multi-effect Decompositions for Financial Data Modeling
Lizhong Wu, John E. Moody
NIPS2
1996 A Smoothing Regularizer for Feedforward and Recurrent Neural Networks
abstract
We derive a smoothing regularizer for dynamic network models by requiring robustness in prediction performance to perturbations of the training data. The regularizer can be viewed as a generalization of the first-order Tikhonov stabilizer to dynamic models. For two layer networks with recurrent connections described by the training criterion with the regularizer is where Φ = {U, V, W} is the network parameter set, Z(t) are the targets, I(t) = {X(s), s = 1,2, …, t} represents the current and all historical input information, N is the size of the training data set, [Formula: see text] is the regularizer, and λ is a regularization parameter. The closed-form expression for the regularizer for time-lagged recurrent networks is where ‖ ‖ is the Euclidean matrix norm and γ is a factor that depends upon the maximal value of the first derivatives of the internal unit activations f(). Simplifications of the regularizer are obtained for simultaneous recurrent nets (τ ↦ 0), two-layer feedforward nets, and one layer linear nets. We have successfully tested this regularizer in a number of case studies and found that it performs better than standard quadratic weight decay.
Lizhong Wu, John E. Moody
Neural Comput.2
1995 Price behavior and Hurst exponents of tick-by-tick interbank foreign exchange rates
abstract
Our previous analysis of tick-by-tick interbank foreign exchange (FX) rates has suggested that the market is not efficient on short time scales. We find that the price changes show mean-reverting rather than random-walk behavior (Moody and Wu, 1994). The results of rescaled range and Hurst exponent analysis presented in the first part of this paper further confirms the mean-reverting attribute in the FX data. The second part of this paper reports on the highly significant correlations between Bid/Ask spreads, volatility and forecastability found in the FX data. These interactions show that higher volatility results in higher forecast error and increased risk for market makers, and that, to compensate for this increase in risk, market makers increase their Bid/Ask spreads.
John E. Moody, Lizhong Wu
CIFEr1
1995 Input variable selection for neural networks: application to predicting the U.S. business cycle
abstract
Selecting a "best subset" of input variables is a critical issue in forecasting. This is especially true when the number of available input series is large, and an exhaustive search through all combinations of variables is computationally infeasible. Inclusion of irrelevant variables not only doesn't help prediction, but can reduce forecasting accuracy through added noise or systematic bias. We demonstrate a technique called "sensitivity-based pruning" (SBP) that removes irrelevant input variables from a nonlinear forecasting or regression model. The technique makes use of a saliency measure computed for each input variable and uses estimates of prediction risk for determining the number of input variables to prune. We present preliminary results of the SBP technique applied to neural network predictors of a key business cycle measure, the US Index of Industrial Production.
Joachim Utans, John E. Moody, Steven Rehfuss, Hava T. Siegelmann
CIFEr2
1995 A Smoothing Regularizer for Recurrent Neural Networks
Lizhong Wu, John E. Moody
NIPS2
1993 Fast Pruning Using Principal Components
Asriel U. Levin, Todd K. Leen, John E. Moody
NIPS3
1992 Weight Space Probability Densities in Stochastic Learning: I. Dynamics and Equilibria
Todd K. Leen, John E. Moody
NIPS2
1991 Towards Faster Stochastic Gradient Search
Christian J. Darken, John E. Moody
NIPS2
1991 The Effective Number of Parameters: An Analysis of Generalization and Regularization in Nonlinear Learning Systems
John E. Moody
NIPS1
1991 Principled Architecture Selection for Neural Networks: Application to Corporate Bond Rating Prediction
John E. Moody, Joachim Utans
NIPS1
1990 Fast adaptive k-means clustering: some empirical results
abstract
The authors present learning rate schedules for fast adaptivek-means clustering which surpass the standard MacQueen learning rate schedule (J. MacQeen, 1967) in speed and quality of solution by several orders of magnitude for largek. The methods accomplish this by largely overcoming the problems of metastable local minima and nonstationarity of cluster region boundaries which plague the MacQueen approach. The authors use simulation results to compare the clustering performances of four learning rate schedules applied to independently sampled data from a uniform distribution in one and two dimensions
Christian J. Darken, John E. Moody
IJCNN2
1990 Note on Learning Rate Schedules for Stochastic Optimization
Christian J. Darken, John E. Moody
NIPS2
1989 Note on Development of Modularity in Simple Cortical Models
Alex Chernajvsky, John E. Moody
NIPS2
1989 Fast Learning in Networks of Locally-Tuned Processing Units
abstract
We propose a network architecture which uses a single internal layer of locally-tuned processing units to learn both classification tasks and real-valued function approximations (Moody and Darken 1988). We consider training such networks in a completely supervised manner, but abandon this approach in favor of a more computationally efficient hybrid learning method which combines self-organized and supervised learning. Our networks learn faster than backpropagation for two reasons: the local representations ensure that only a few units respond to any given input, thus reducing computational overhead, and the hybrid learning rules are linear rather than nonlinear, thus leading to faster convergence. Unlike many existing methods for data analysis, our network architecture and learning rules are truly adaptive and are thus appropriate for real-time use.
John E. Moody, Christian J. Darken
Neural Comput.1
1988 Fast Learning in Multi-Resolution Hierarchies
John E. Moody
NIPS1
1988 Speedy alternatives to back propagation
abstract
This paper mainly investigates the influences of compressible parameters on the vertical vibration of a pile embedded in layered poroelastic soil media. The pile is treated as a 1D elastic bar by the finite element method, and fundamental solutions for the layered poroelastic soils due to a vertical dynamic load are obtained by the analytical layer element method. Based on the compatibility conditions, the pile-soil dynamic interaction problem is solved. The numerical scheme has been compiled into a Fortran program for numerical calculation. Influences of the pile-soil stiffness ratio, compressible parameters, vibration frequency and the soil stratification are discussed.
John E. Moody, Christian J. Darken
Neural Networks1