Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nicole Valette

dblp:24/3244 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 56% Empirical software engineering · 44%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering
software metrics
0.011990
Studies on Measuring Software · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1990
Software testing › software reliability
software reliability modeling
0.011990
Studies on Measuring Software · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1990

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quantitative analysis · 0.0data collection and analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1990 Studies on Measuring Software
abstract
A quality control workshop prototype based on a quantitative approach which is operational from the validation phase was developed. Several telecommunications software systems were analyzed, particularly those areas pertaining to complexity and reliability. The workshop, the methods use to collect, handle, and analyze data, and the tools employed are described. The results allow evaluation of tool usefulness, pertinence of metrics, and validation of the reliability model. It is noted that the research carried out will lead to the application and evaluation of software quality assurance plans and to the evaluation of current beliefs concerning validity, efficiency, and costs.>
Gilbert Le Gall, Marie-Françoise Adam, Henri Derriennic, Bernard Moreau, Nicole Valette
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.5