Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jonathan Wray

dblp:24/435 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 47% Robot manipulation · 47% Robot navigation and mapping · 6%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation › nonprehensile manipulation
orienting behavior
0.021999
Adaptation of orienting behavior: from the barn owl to a robotic system · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1999
A robotic system emulating the adaptive orienting behavior of the barn owl · ICRA 1997
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.011999
Adaptation of orienting behavior: from the barn owl to a robotic system · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1999
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
sensorimotor coordination
0.011997
A robotic system emulating the adaptive orienting behavior of the barn owl · ICRA 1997
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › position estimation
spatial localization
0.011997
A robotic system emulating the adaptive orienting behavior of the barn owl · ICRA 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

supervised learning · 0.0neural network model · 0.0neuromodulatory learning model · 0.0computer model of neural structures · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 Binaural cross-correlation and auditory localization in the barn owl: a theoretical study
Michele Rucci, Jonathan Wray
Neural Networks2
1999 Adaptation of orienting behavior: from the barn owl to a robotic system
abstract
Autonomous robotic systems need to adjust their sensorimotor coordinations so as to maintain good performance in the presence of changes in their sensory and motor characteristics. Biological systems are able to adapt to large variations in their physical and functional properties. In the last decade, the adjustment of orienting behavior has been carefully investigated in the barn owl, a nocturnal predator with highly developed auditory capabilities. We have previously proposed that the development and maintenance of the barn owl's accurate orienting behavior can be explained through a process of learning based on the saliency of sensorimotor events. In this paper we consider the application of a detailed computer model of the principal neural structures involved in the process of spatial localization in the barn owl to the control of the orienting behavior of a robotic system, in the presence of auditory and visual stimulation. The system is composed of a robotic head equipped with two lateral microphones and a camera. We show that the model produces accurate orienting behavior toward both auditory and visual targets and is able to quickly recover good performance after alterations of the sensory inputs and motor outputs. The results illustrate that an architecture specifically designed to account for biological phenomena can produce flexible and robust motor control of a robotic system operating in the real world.
Michele Rucci, Gerald M. Edelman, Jonathan Wray
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom.3
1997 A robotic system emulating the adaptive orienting behavior of the barn owl
abstract
Autonomous robotic systems need to adjust their sensorimotor coordinations so as to maintain good performance in the presence of changes in their sensory and motor characteristics. Biological systems are able to adapt to large variations in their physical and functional properties. The adjustment of orienting behavior has been carefully investigated in the barn owl, a nocturnal predator with highly developed auditory capabilities. In the optic tectum of the barn owl, an area well-known to be involved in the production of orienting behavior, neural maps of space in the visual, auditory, and motor modalities are found in close alignment with each other. As a neurophysiological correlate of the adjustment of motor responses, neural maps in the tectum tend to realign if the sensory inputs are manipulated. We have recently proposed that the development and maintenance of such map alignment can be explained through a process of learning, in which plasticity is mediated by the activation of diffuse-projecting neuromodulatory systems which respond to innate or acquired salient cues. This proposal was tested using a detailed computer model of the principal neural structures involved in the process of spatial localisation in the barn owl. Here we consider the application of this model to the control of the orienting behavior of a robotic system in the presence of auditory and visual stimulation. The system we consider is composed of a robotic head equipped with two lateral microphones and a camera. We show that the model produces accurate orienting behavior toward both auditory and visual stimuli during normal visual experience, after alteration of the visual inputs, and after the reestablishment of normal visual conditions. The results illustrate that an architecture specifically designed to account for biological phenomena can produce flexible and robust control of a robotic system.
Michele Rucci, Jonathan Wray, Giulio Tononi, Gerald M. Edelman
ICRA2
1996 Author's response
Jonathan Wray, Gary G. R. Green
Neural Networks1
1995 Neural networks, approximation theory, and finite precision computation
Jonathan Wray, Gary G. R. Green
Neural Networks1