Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sanjeev Mahajan

dblp:24/507 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 10 · 5 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Approximation and online algorithms · 58% Computational complexity · 22% Mathematical optimization · 14%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms › deterministic approximation
derandomization of approximation algorithms
0.021999
Derandomizing Approximation Algorithms Based on Semidefinite Programming · SIAM J. Comput. 1999
Derandomizing Semidefinite Programming Based Approximation Algorithms · FOCS 1995
Computational complexity
derandomization
0.021997
The Cost of Derandomization: Computability or Competitiveness · SIAM J. Comput. 1997
Derandomizing Semidefinite Programming Based Approximation Algorithms · FOCS 1995
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms
0.021997
The Cost of Derandomization: Computability or Competitiveness · SIAM J. Comput. 1997
Infinite Games, Randomization, Computability, and Applications to Online Problems (Preliminary Version) · STOC 1991
Approximation and online algorithms
randomized rounding
0.011999
Derandomizing Approximation Algorithms Based on Semidefinite Programming · SIAM J. Comput. 1999
Mathematical optimization
semidefinite programming
0.011999
Derandomizing Approximation Algorithms Based on Semidefinite Programming · SIAM J. Comput. 1999
Approximation and online algorithms
semidefinite programming rounding
0.011999
Derandomizing Approximation Algorithms Based on Semidefinite Programming · SIAM J. Comput. 1999
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
competitive analysis
0.011997
The Cost of Derandomization: Computability or Competitiveness · SIAM J. Comput. 1997
Computational complexity › pseudorandomness
pseudorandom generators
0.011997
The Cost of Derandomization: Computability or Competitiveness · SIAM J. Comput. 1997
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.011995
Derandomizing Semidefinite Programming Based Approximation Algorithms · FOCS 1995
Mathematical optimization › semidefinite programming
semidefinite programming approximation
0.011995
Derandomizing Semidefinite Programming Based Approximation Algorithms · FOCS 1995
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph cut
max-cut
0.021999
Derandomizing Approximation Algorithms Based on Semidefinite Programming · SIAM J. Comput. 1999
Derandomizing Semidefinite Programming Based Approximation Algorithms · FOCS 1995
Computational complexity
computability theory
0.011991
Infinite Games, Randomization, Computability, and Applications to Online Problems (Preliminary Version) · STOC 1991
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
randomized online algorithms
0.011991
Infinite Games, Randomization, Computability, and Applications to Online Problems (Preliminary Version) · STOC 1991
Logic in computer science
infinite games
0.011991
Infinite Games, Randomization, Computability, and Applications to Online Problems (Preliminary Version) · STOC 1991

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

derandomization · 0.1spherical symmetry · 0.0semidefinite programming · 0.0pseudorandomness · 0.0randomization · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 Solving Some Discrepancy Problems in NC
Sanjeev Mahajan, Edgar A. Ramos, K. V. Subrahmanyam 0001
Algorithmica1
1999 Derandomizing Approximation Algorithms Based on Semidefinite Programming
abstract
Remarkable breakthroughs have been made recently in obtaining approximate solutions to some fundamental NP-hard problems, namely Max-Cut, Max k-Cut, Max-Sat, Max-Dicut, Max-bisection, k-vertex coloring, maximum independent set, etc. All these breakthroughs involve polynomial time randomized algorithms based upon semidefinite programming, a technique pioneered by Goemans and Williamson. In this paper, we give techniques to derandomize the above class of randomized algorithms, thus obtaining polynomial time deterministic algorithms with the same approximation ratios for the above problems. At the heart of our technique is the use of spherical symmetry to convert a nested sequence of n integrations, which cannot be approximated sufficiently well in polynomial time, to a nested sequence of just a constant number of integrations, which can be approximated sufficiently well in polynomial time.
Sanjeev Mahajan
SIAM J. Comput.1
1997 Solving Some Discrepancy Problems in NC
Sanjeev Mahajan, Edgar A. Ramos, K. V. Subrahmanyam 0001
FSTTCS1
1997 Using Amplification to Compute Majority with Small Majority Gates
Arvind Gupta, Sanjeev Mahajan
Comput. Complex.2
1997 The Cost of Derandomization: Computability or Competitiveness
Xiaotie Deng, Sanjeev Mahajan
SIAM J. Comput.2
1995 Semidefinite Programming and its Applications to NP Problems
Roman Bacik, Sanjeev Mahajan
COCOON2
1995 Derandomizing Semidefinite Programming Based Approximation Algorithms
abstract
Remarkable breakthroughs have been made recently in obtaining approximate solutions to some fundamental NP-Complete problems, namely Max-Cut, Max k-Cut, Max-Sat, Max-Dicut, Max-Bisection, k Vertex Coloring, Independent Set, etc. These breakthroughs all involve polynomial time randomized algorithms based upon semidefinite programming, a technique pioneered by M. Goemans and D. Williamson (1994). In this paper, we give techniques to derandomize the above class of randomized algorithms, thus obtaining polynomial time deterministic algorithms with the same approximation ratios for the above problems. Note that Goemans and Williamson also gave an elegant method to derandomize their Max-Cut algorithm. We show here that their technique has a fatal flaw. The techniques we subsequently develop are very different from theirs. At the heart of our technique is the use of spherical symmetry to convert a nested sequence of n integrations, which cannot be approximated sufficiently well in polynomial time, to a nested sequence of just a constant number of integrations, which can be approximated sufficiently well in polynomial time.
Sanjeev Mahajan, Ramesh Hariharan
FOCS1
1994 Regularity and Locality in K-terminal Graphs
Sanjeev Mahajan, Joseph G. Peters
Discret. Appl. Math.1
1991 Infinite Games, Randomization, Computability, and Applications to Online Problems (Preliminary Version)
abstract
We are interested in understanding the exact power randomization provides to online algorithms.We study this problem in terms of computability, using the formulation of online problems
Xiaotie Deng, Sanjeev Mahajan
STOC2
1991 Server Problems and Resistive Spaces
Xiaotie Deng, Sanjeev Mahajan
Inf. Process. Lett.2