VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
So Norimatsu
dblp:24/6042
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-1298-6108ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 10 · 4 first-author · 6 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Interpretations of Automotive SPICE Generic Practices on Level 2
Elena-Flavia Povirnaru, Damjan Ekert, So Norimatsu, Ralf Mayer, Sascha Glasbrenner, Alexander Feulner, Brigitte Kurz-Grießnig, Peter Lindermuth, Svatopluk Stolfa, Mary Roselind Michael, Valeria Franzitta, Vanessa Schumacher, Rainer Dreves, Andreas Gasch, Richard Messnarz |
EuroSPI (1) | 3 |
| 2025 | The PIM.3 process improvement process - Part of the iNTACS certified process expert trainingabstractAbstract This paper documents the results of the PIM.3 (Process Improvement Management) working group in INTACS (International Assessor Certification Schema) supported by the VDA‐QMC (Verband der Deutschen Automobilindustrie/German Automotive Association–Quality Management Center). INTACS promotes Automotive SPICE, which is an international standard that allows process capability assessment of projects, which implement systems that integrate mechanics, electronics, and software including optionally cybersecurity, functional safety, and machine learning. The paper outlines that for the first time since more than 20 years, the INTACS and VDA‐QMC included a process like PIM.3 Process Improvement Management in the scope for the assessor training. Before that, the assessments focused on the management, engineering, and support processes of series projects, while the improvement management has not been trained or assessed. Richard Messnarz, Vesna Djordjevic, Viktor Grémen, Winifred Menezes, Ahmed Alborae, Rainer Dreves, So Norimatsu, Thomas Wegner, Bernhard Sechser |
J. Softw. Evol. Process. | 7 |
| 2024 | Analysis of Automotive SPICE V4.0 Changes
Damjan Ekert, Elena-Flavia Povirnaru, Andreas Gasch, Ralf Mayer, So Norimatsu, Alexander Feulner, Brigitte Kurz-Grießnig, Peter Lindermuth, Rainer Dreves, Rudolf Grave, Richard Messnarz |
EuroSPI (1) | 5 |
| 2024 | Case Study: Game-Based Learning of SPI Manifesto Behavior and Attitude Transformation Using Small-step Good Practices in the "Sugoroku" Game
So Norimatsu, Makoto Oomori, Keiko Mizuta, Aiichiro Niwa, Yoshiyuki Anan, Kiyoshi Endo |
EuroSPI (2) | 1 |
| 2022 | An Interpretation of the PIM.3 Process Improvement Process - Results of the iNTACS Process Expert Training Developer Group for PIM.3
Richard Messnarz, Vesna Djordjevic, Viktor Grémen, Winifred Menezes, Ahmed Alborae, Rainer Dreves, So Norimatsu, Thomas Wegner, Bernhard Sechser |
EuroSPI | 7 |
| 2021 | First Experiences with the Automotive SPICE for Cybersecurity Assessment Model
Richard Messnarz, So Norimatsu, Jürgen Dobaj, Damjan Ekert, Georg Macher, Tobias Zehetner, Laura Aschbacher |
EuroSPI | 2 |
| 2020 | Experience with the Performance of Online Distributed Assessments - Using Advanced Infrastructure
Damjan Ekert, Richard Messnarz, So Norimatsu, Tobias Zehetner, Laura Aschbacher |
EuroSPI | 3 |
| 2020 | Derivation of SPI Manifesto Principle Example from an SPI Story
So Norimatsu, Noriko Wada |
EuroSPI | 1 |
| 2019 | Formulation of process improvement knowledge: 7 components of a good PI storyabstractAbstract The authors have been working on establishment of a knowledge structure for process improvement (PI) at “Japan SPI Consortium”. Our objective is to store useful knowledge, to provide mechanisms for their usage, and to encourage creation of new knowledge. During our efforts to extract, categorize and consolidate knowledge from the presentation materials at our conferences, we saw problems with respect to the coverage of knowledge expressed in the experiences. To solve this issue, we devised a knowledge model that consists of seven information elements as a representation, and then introduced a standard template to be used when submitting a proposal to the conference. As a result, statistically significant change in the knowledge coverage was observed, and the amount of information has increased for items such as causal analysis, verification and validation of process improvement over the successive conferences. Positive feedback was obtained from proposal reviewers and conference participants for improved understandability. Percentage of successful stories has also increased among the presentations. So Norimatsu, Kiyoshi Endo, Makoto Usugi, Aiichiro Niwa, Koichi Tange |
J. Softw. Evol. Process. | 1 |
| 2018 | Development of "SPI Strategy Framework" and Its Application
So Norimatsu, Toshiyuki Kishi, Noriko Wada |
EuroSPI | 1 |