Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sujay Phadke

dblp:24/6686 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 41% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 31% Electronic design automation · 19%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › pipelining
pipelined processor
0.112006
Ultra low-cost defect protection for microprocessor pipelines · ASPLOS 2006
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
soft errors
0.112006
Ultra low-cost defect protection for microprocessor pipelines · ASPLOS 2006
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › design for testability
built-in self-test
0.012006
Ultra low-cost defect protection for microprocessor pipelines · ASPLOS 2006
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
checkpoint-based microarchitecture
0.012006
Ultra low-cost defect protection for microprocessor pipelines · ASPLOS 2006
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
checkpointing
0.012006
Ultra low-cost defect protection for microprocessor pipelines · ASPLOS 2006
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
online testing
0.012006
Ultra low-cost defect protection for microprocessor pipelines · ASPLOS 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

circuit-level simulation · 0.1architectural simulation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 MLP aware heterogeneous memory system
abstract
Main memory plays a critical role in a computer system's performance and energy efficiency. Three key parameters define a main memory system's efficiency: latency, bandwidth, and power. Current memory systems tries to balance all these three parameters to achieve reasonable efficiency for most programs. However, in a multi-core system, applications with various memory demands are simultaneously executed. This paper proposes a heterogeneous main memory with three different memory modules, where each module is heavily optimized for one the three parameters at the cost of compromising the other two. Based on the memory access characteristics of an application, the operating system allocates its pages in a memory module that satisfies its memory requirements. When compared to a homogeneous memory system, we demonstrate through cycle-accurate simulations that our design results in about 13.5% increase in system performance and a 20% improvement in memory power.
Sujay Phadke, Satish Narayanasamy
DATE1
2006 Ultra low-cost defect protection for microprocessor pipelines
abstract
The sustained push toward smaller and smaller technology sizes has reached a point where device reliability has moved to the forefront of concerns for next-generation designs. Silicon failure mechanisms, such as transistor wearout and manufacturing defects, are a growing challenge that threatens the yield and product lifetime of future systems. In this paper we introduce the BulletProof pipeline, the first ultra low-cost mechanism to protect a microprocessor pipeline and on-chip memory system from silicon defects. To achieve this goal we combine area-frugal on-line testing techniques and system-level checkpointing to provide the same guarantees of reliability found in traditional solutions, but at much lower cost. Our approach utilizes a microarchitectural checkpointing mechanism which creates coarse-grained epochs of execution, during which distributed on-line built in self-test (BIST) mechanisms validate the integrity of the underlying hardware. In case a failure is detected, we rely on the natural redundancy of instructionlevel parallel processors to repair the system so that it can still operate in a degraded performance mode. Using detailed circuit-level and architectural simulation, we find that our approach provides very high coverage of silicon defects (89%) with little area cost (5.8%). In addition, when a defect occurs, the subsequent degraded mode of operation was found to have only moderate performance impacts, (from 4% to 18% slowdown).
Smitha Shyam, Kypros Constantinides, Sujay Phadke, Valeria Bertacco, Todd M. Austin
ASPLOS3