Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Meike Becker

dblp:24/8930 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 67% Image and video processing · 33%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics
medical visualization
0.212016
Comparative Local Quality Assessment of 3D Medical Image Segmentations with Focus on Statistical Shape Model-Based Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2016
Image and video processing › image segmentation
segmentation evaluation
0.212016
Comparative Local Quality Assessment of 3D Medical Image Segmentations with Focus on Statistical Shape Model-Based Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2016
Visualization and visual analytics
visual comparison
0.212016
Comparative Local Quality Assessment of 3D Medical Image Segmentations with Focus on Statistical Shape Model-Based Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2016
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › medical image analysis › medical image segmentation
3d medical image segmentation
0.112016
Comparative Local Quality Assessment of 3D Medical Image Segmentations with Focus on Statistical Shape Model-Based Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical shape model · 0.5hierarchical clustering · 0.5connectivity criterion · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Comparative Local Quality Assessment of 3D Medical Image Segmentations with Focus on Statistical Shape Model-Based Algorithms
abstract
The quality of automatic 3D medical segmentation algorithms needs to be assessed on test datasets comprising several 3D images (i.e., instances of an organ). The experts need to compare the segmentation quality across the dataset in order to detect systematic segmentation problems. However, such comparative evaluation is not supported well by current methods. We present a novel system for assessing and comparing segmentation quality in a dataset with multiple 3D images. The data is analyzed and visualized in several views. We detect and show regions with systematic segmentation quality characteristics. For this purpose, we extended a hierarchical clustering algorithm with a connectivity criterion. We combine quality values across the dataset for determining regions with characteristic segmentation quality across instances. Using our system, the experts can also identify 3D segmentations with extraordinary quality characteristics. While we focus on algorithms based on statistical shape models, our approach can also be applied to cases, where landmark correspondences among instances can be established. We applied our approach to three real datasets: liver, cochlea and facial nerve. The segmentation experts were able to identify organ regions with systematic segmentation characteristics as well as to detect outlier instances.
Tatiana von Landesberger, Dennis Basgier, Meike Becker
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.3
2011 Automatic Construction of Statistical Shape Models for Vertebrae
Meike Becker, Matthias Kirschner, Simon Fuhrmann, Stefan Wesarg
MICCAI (2)1
2011 3D Active Shape Model Segmentation with Nonlinear Shape Priors
Matthias Kirschner, Meike Becker, Stefan Wesarg
MICCAI (2)2