Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Khalid Zoabi
dblp:241/0079
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Storage systems · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Operating systems · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Storage systems
file systems |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On the Lifecycle of the File · ACM Trans. Storage 2019 |
Operating systems › resource management › storage management › file systems
file system monitoring |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | On the Lifecycle of the File · ACM Trans. Storage 2019 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | On the Lifecycle of the FileabstractUsers and Operating Systems (OSs) have vastly different views of files. OSs use files to persist data and structured information. To accomplish this, OSs treat files as named collections of bytes managed in hierarchical file systems. Despite their critical role in computing, little attention is paid to the lifecycle of the file, the evolution of file contents, or the evolution of file metadata. In contrast, users have rich mental models of files: they group files into projects, send data repositories to others, work on documents over time, and stash them aside for future use. Current OSs and Revision Control Systems ignore such mental models, persisting a selective, manually designated history of revisions. Preserving the mental model allows applications to better match how users view their files, making file processing and archiving tools more effective. We propose two mechanisms that OSs can adopt to better preserve the mental model: File Lifecycle Events (FLEs) that record a file’s progression and Complex File Events (CFEs) that combine them into meaningful patterns. We present the Complex File Events Engine (CoFEE), which uses file system monitoring and an extensible rulebase (Drools) to detect FLEs and convert them into complex ones. CFEs are persisted in NoSQL stores for later querying. Michael J. May, Etamar Laron, Khalid Zoabi, Havah Gerhardt |
ACM Trans. Storage | 3 |