As the capabilities of quantum computing hardware continue to rise, algorithms that exploit them are becoming increasingly complex. These developments increase the need for sophisticated compilation frameworks that translate high-level algorithms into executable code. In the past, most solutions were built with a quantum-first approach and handled mostly pure quantum programs without classical elements such as structured control flow. However, developments in quantum algorithms, error correction, and optimization, as well as the integration into high-performance computing (HPC) environments, depend on such classical elements. As quantum-first approaches increasingly struggle to handle these concepts, classical-first approaches are becoming a promising alternative. In this work, we present the MQT Compiler Collection, a blueprint for a future-proof quantum-classical compilation framework built on the Multi-Level Intermediate Representation (MLIR). After years of experience with the quantum-first approach and its shortcomings, we propose a framework that embraces core MLIR concepts to support the full compilation pipeline from high-level algorithms to hardware-specific instructions. The proposed architecture is designed from the ground up to support complex optimizations beyond, e.g., simple gate cancellation. It is publicly available at github.com/munich-quantum-toolkit/core.

Superconducting quantum computers are fundamentally limited by restricted qubit connectivity. Bus-resonator architectures alleviate this constraint by enabling effective all-to-all interactions. This advantage, however, comes at the cost of significant operational overhead. Realizing the full potential of such hardware thus requires sophisticated compilation techniques that minimize this overhead. In this work, we present the first formalization of the underlying compilation problem for bus-resonator architectures amenable to so-called SAT-CP solvers. This formalization yields optimal solutions for small quantum circuits. For larger instances, we propose a linear-time heuristic. Experimental evaluations confirm that the formalization makes it possible to find optimal solutions even in vast search spaces and that the heuristic provides near-optimal compilation while scaling efficiently to circuits of practical size. Together, these contributions establish both a rigorous baseline and a practical path toward low-overhead compilation for superconducting bus-resonator devices.

The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) requires considered optimization problems to be translated into a compatible format. A popular transformation step in this pipeline involves the quadratization of higher-order binary optimization problems, translating them into Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) formulations through the introduction of auxiliary variables. Conventional algorithms for the selection of auxiliary variables often aim to minimize the total number of required variables without taking the constraints of the underlying quantum computer-in particular, the connectivity of its qubits-into consideration. This quickly results in interaction graphs that are incompatible with the target device, resulting in a substantial compilation overhead even with highly optimized compilers. To address this issue, this work presents a novel approach for the selection of auxiliary variables tailored for architectures with limited connectivity. By specifically constructing an interaction graph with a regular structure and a limited maximal degree of vertices, we find a way to construct QAOA circuits that can be mapped efficiently to a variety of architectures. We show that, compared to circuits constructed from a QUBO formulation using conventional auxiliary selection methods, the proposed approach reduces the circuit depth by almost 40%. An implementation of all proposed methods is publicly available at https://github.com/munich-quantum-toolkit/problemsolver.

Quantum computing is becoming a reality. Superconducting, ion traps, neutral atoms, etc.—the hardware is getting there! However, software capable of handling complex design tasks is needed to connect end users to these platforms. Unfortunately, software for quantum computing is still in its infancy, and the development of quantum computing software remains a significant challenge. The MQSC aims to create production-ready software tools that provide for quantum computing what we already take for granted in classical IT.

Despite the continuous advancements in size and robustness of real quantum devices, reliable large-scale quantum computers are not yet available. Hence, classical simulation of quantum algorithms remains crucial for testing new methods and estimating quantum advantage. Pushing classical simulation methods to their limit is essential, particularly due to their inherent exponential complexity. Besides the established Schrödinger-style full statevector simulation, so-called Hybrid Schrödinger-Feynman (HSF) approaches have shown promise to make simulations more efficient. HSF simulation employs the idea of “cutting” the circuit into smaller parts, reducing their execution times. This, however, comes at the cost of an exponential overhead in the number of cuts. Inspired by the domain of Quantum Circuit Cutting, we propose an HSF simulation method based on the idea of “joint cutting” to significantly reduce the aforementioned overhead. This means that, prior to the cutting procedure, gates are collected into “blocks” and all gates in a block are jointly cut instead of individually. We investigate how the proposed refinement can help decrease simulation times and highlight the remaining challenges. Experimental evaluations show that “joint cutting” can outperform the standard HSF simulation by up to a factor $\approx 4000 \times$ and the Schrödinger-style simulation by a factor $\approx 200 \times$ for suitable instances. The implementation is available at https://github.com/cda-tum/mqt-qsim-joint-cutting.

Quantum computing promises to solve problems previously deemed infeasible. However, high error rates necessitate quantum error correction for practical applications. Seminal experiments with zoned neutral atom architectures have shown remarkable potential for fault-tolerant quantum computing. To fully harness their potential, efficient software solutions are vital. A key aspect of quantum error correction is the initialization of physical qubits representing a logical qubit in a highly entangled state. This process, known as state preparation, is the foundation of most quantum error correction codes and, hence, a crucial step towards fault-tolerant quantum computing. Generating a schedule of target-specific instructions to perform the state preparation is highly complex. First software tools exist but are not suitable for the zoned neutral atom architectures. This work addresses this gap by leveraging the computational power of SMT solvers and generating minimal schedules for the state preparation of logical arrays. Experimental evaluations demonstrate that actively utilizing zones to shield idling qubits consistently results in higher fidelities than solutions disregarding these zones. The complete code is publicly available in open-source as part of the Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT) at https://github.com/cdatum/mqt-qmap.

Efficient methods for the simulation of quantum circuits on classical computers are crucial for their analysis due to the exponential growth of the problem size with the number of qubits. Here we study lumping methods based on bisimulation, an established class of techniques that has been proven successful for (classic) stochastic and deterministic systems such as Markov chains and ordinary differential equations. Forward constrained bisimulation yields a lower-dimensional model which exactly preserves quantum measurements projected on a linear subspace of interest. Backward constrained bisimulation gives a reduction that is valid on a subspace containing the circuit input, from which the circuit result can be fully recovered. We provide an algorithm to compute the constraint bisimulations yielding coarsest reductions in both cases, using a duality result relating the two notions. As applications, we provide theoretical bounds on the size of the reduced state space for well-known quantum algorithms for search, optimization, and factorization. Using a prototype implementation, we report significant reductions on a set of benchmarks. In particular, we show that constrained bisimulation can boost decision-diagram-based quantum circuit simulation by several orders of magnitude, allowing thus for substantial synergy effects.

Fueled by recent accomplishments in quantum computing hardware and software, an increasing number of problems from various application domains are being explored as potential use cases for this new technology. Similarly to classical computing, realizing an application on a particular quantum device requires the corresponding (quantum) circuit to be compiled so that it can be executed on the device. With a steadily growing number of available devices—each with their own advantages and disadvantages—and a wide variety of different compilation tools, the number of choices to consider when trying to realize an application is quickly exploding. Due to missing tool support and automation, especially end-users who are not quantum computing experts are easily left unsupported and overwhelmed. In this work, we propose a methodology that allows one to automatically select a suitable quantum device for a particular application and provides an optimized compiler for the selected device. The resulting framework—called the MQT Predictor —not only supports end-users in navigating the vast landscape of choices, it also allows mixing and matching compiler passes from various tools to create optimized compilers that transcend the individual tools. Evaluations of an exemplary framework instantiation based on more than 500 quantum circuits and seven devices have shown that—compared with both Qiskit’s and TKET’s most optimized compilation flows for all devices—the MQT Predictor produces circuits within the top-3 out of 14 baselines in more than 98% of cases while frequently outperforming any tested combination by up to 53% when optimizing for expected fidelity . Additionally, the framework is trained and evaluated for critical depth as another figure of merit to showcase its flexibility and generalizability—producing circuits within the top-3 in 89% of cases while frequently outperforming any tested combination by up to 400%. MQT Predictor is part of the Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT) and publicly available as open-source on GitHub ( https://github.com/cda-tum/mqt-predictor ) and as an easy-to-use Python package ( https://pypi.org/p/mqt.predictor ).

Quantum circuit simulator (QCS) is essential for designing quantum algorithms because it assists researchers in understanding how quantum operations work without access to expensive quantum computers. Traditional array-based QCSs suffer from exponential time and memory complexities. To address this problem, Decision Diagram (DD) was introduced to compress simulation data by exploring the circuit regularity. However, for irregular circuit structures, DD-based simulation incurs significant runtime and memory overhead. To overcome this challenge, we present FlatDD, a high-performance QCS that capitalizes on the strength of both DD- and array-based approaches. FlatDD parallelizes the simulation workload at multiple levels and leverages an efficient caching technique to reuse historical results. To further enhance the simulation performance for deep circuits, FlatDD introduces a gate-fusion algorithm to reduce the computational cost. Compared to state-of-the-art QCSs on commonly used quantum circuits, FlatDD achieves 34.81× speed-up and 1.93× memory reduction.

Quantum Error Correction (QEC) is an essential field of research towards the realization of large-scale quantum computers. On the theoretical side, a lot of effort is put into designing error-correcting codes that protect quantum data from errors, which inevitably happen due to the noisy nature of quantum hardware and quantum bits (qubits). Protecting data with an error-correcting code necessitates means to recover the original data, given a potentially corrupted data set---a task referred to as decoding. It is vital that decoding algorithms can recover error-free states in an efficient manner. While theoretical properties of certain QEC methods have been extensively studied, good techniques to analyze their performance in practically more relevant settings is still a widely unexplored area. In this work, we propose a set of software tools that facilitate numerical experiments with so-called Quantum Low-Density Parity-Check codes (QLDPC codes)---a broad class of codes, some of which have recently been shown to be asymptotically good. Based on that, we provide an implementation of a general decoder for QLDPC codes. On top of that, we propose a highly efficient heuristic decoder that eliminates the runtime bottlenecks of the general QLDPC decoder while still maintaining comparable decoding performance. These tools eventually make it possible to confirm theoretical results around QLDPC codes in a more practical setting and showcase the value of software tools (in addition to theoretical considerations) for investigating codes for practical applications. The resulting tool, which is publicly available at https://github.com/cda-tum/qecc as part of the Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT), is meant to provide a playground for the search for "practically good" quantum codes.

Today, the verification of classical circuits poses a severe challenge for the design of circuits and systems. While the underlying (exponential) complexity is tackled in various fashions (simulation-based approaches, emulation, formal equivalence checking, fuzzing, model checking, etc.), no "silver bullet" has been found yet which allows to escape the growing verification gap. In this work, we entertain and investigate the idea of a complementary approach which aims at exploiting reversible computing. More precisely, we show the potential of the reversible computing paradigm for verification, debunk misleading paths that do not allow to exploit this potential, and discuss the resulting consequences for the development of future, complementary design and verification flows. An extensive empirical study (involving more than 30 million simulations) confirms these findings. Although this work cannot provide a fully-fledged realization yet, it may provide the basis for an alternative path towards overcoming the verification gap.

Variational quantum algorithms have been introduced as a promising class of quantum-classical hybrid algorithms that can already be used with the noisy quantum computing hardware available today by employing parameterized quantum circuits. Considering the non-trivial nature of quantum circuit compilation and the subtleties of quantum computing, it is essential to verify that these parameterized circuits have been compiled correctly. Established equivalence checking procedures that handle parameter-free circuits already exist. However, no methodology capable of handling circuits with parameters has been proposed yet. This work fills this gap by showing that verifying the equivalence of parameterized circuits can be achieved in a purely symbolic fashion using an equivalence checking approach based on the ZX-calculus. At the same time, proofs of inequality can be efficiently obtained with conventional methods by taking advantage of the degrees of freedom inherent to parameterized circuits. We implemented the corresponding methods and proved that the resulting methodology is complete. Experimental evaluations (using the entire parametric ansatz circuit library provided by Qiskit as benchmarks) demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed approach.

Executing quantum algorithms on a quantum computer requires compilation to representations that conform to all restrictions imposed by the device. Due to devices' limited coherence times and gate fidelities, the compilation process has to be optimized as much as possible. To this end, an algorithm's description first has to be synthesized using the device's gate library. In this paper, we consider the optimal synthesis of Clifford circuits---an important subclass of quantum circuits, with various applications. Such techniques are essential to establish lower bounds for (heuristic) synthesis methods and gauging their performance. Due to the huge search space, existing optimal techniques are limited to a maximum of six qubits. The contribution of this work is twofold: First, we propose an optimal synthesis method for Clifford circuits based on encoding the task as a satisfiability (SAT) problem and solving it using a SAT solver in conjunction with a binary search scheme. The resulting tool is demonstrated to synthesize optimal circuits for up to 26 qubits---more than four times as many as the current state of the art. Second, we experimentally show that the overhead introduced by state-of-the-art heuristics exceeds the lower bound by 27 % on average. The resulting tool is publicly available at https://github.com/cda-tum/qmap.

Any quantum computing application, once encoded as a quantum circuit, must be compiled before being executable on a quantum computer. Similar to classical compilation, quantum compilation is a sequential process with many compilation steps and numerous possible optimization passes. Despite the similarities, the development of compilers for quantum computing is still in its infancy—lacking mutual consolidation on the best sequence of passes, compatibility, adaptability, and flexibility. In this work, we take advantage of decades of classical compiler optimization and propose a reinforcement learning framework for developing optimized quantum circuit compilation flows. Through distinct constraints and a unifying interface, the framework supports the combination of techniques from different compilers and optimization tools in a single compilation flow. Experimental evaluations show that the proposed framework—set up with a selection of compilation passes from IBM’s Qiskit and Quantinuum’s TKET—significantly outperforms both individual compilers in 73% of cases regarding the expected fidelity. The framework is available on GitHub (https://github.com/cda-tum/MQTPredictor) as part of the Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT).

Quantum computing is an emerging technology that has the potential to revolutionize fields such as cryptography, machine learning, optimization, and quantum simulation. However, a major challenge in the realization of quantum algorithms on actual machines is ensuring that the gates in a quantum circuit (i.e., corresponding operations) match the topology of a targeted architecture so that the circuit can be executed while, at the same time, the resulting costs (e.g., in terms of the number of additionally introduced gates, fidelity, etc.) are kept low. This is known as the quantum circuit mapping problem. This summary paper provides an overview of QMAP-an open-source tool that is part of the Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT) and offers efficient, automated, and accessible methods for tackling this problem. To this end, the paper first briefly reviews the problem. Afterwards, it shows how QMAP can be used to efficiently map quantum circuits to quantum computing architectures from both a user's and a developer's perspective. QMAP is publicly available as open-source at https://github.com/cda-tum/qmap.

Simulating quantum circuits on classical computers is a notoriously hard, yet increasingly important task for the development and testing of quantum algorithms. In order to alleviate this inherent complexity, efficient data structures and methods, such as tensor networks and decision diagrams, have been proposed. However, their efficiency heavily depends on the order in which the individual computations are performed. For tensor networks, the order is defined by so-called contraction plans and a plethora of methods has been developed to determine suitable plans. On the other hand, simulation based on decision diagrams is mostly conducted in a straight-forward, i.e., sequential, fashion thus far. In this work, we study the importance of the path that is chosen when simulating quantum circuits using decision diagrams and show, conceptually and experimentally, that choosing the right simulation path can make a vast difference in the efficiency of classical simulations using decision diagrams. We propose an open-source framework (available at github.com/cda-tum/ddsim) that not only allows to investigate of dedicated simulation paths but also to reuse of existing findings, e.g., obtained from determining contraction plans for tensor networks. Experimental evaluations show that translating strategies from the domain of tensor networks may yield speedups of several factors compared to the state of the art. Furthermore, we design a dedicated simulation path heuristic that allows to improve the performance even further—frequently yielding speedups of several orders of magnitude. Finally, we provide an extensive discussion on what can be learned from tensor networks and what cannot.

Compiling a high-level quantum circuit down to a low-level description that can be executed on state-of-the-art quantum computers is a crucial part of the software stack for quantum computing. One step in compiling a quantum circuit to some device is quantum circuit mapping, where the circuit is transformed such that it complies with the architecture’s limited qubit connectivity. Because the search space in quantum circuit mapping grows exponentially in the number of qubits, it is desirable to consider as few of the device’s physical qubits as possible in the process. Previous work conjectured that it suffices to consider only subarchitectures of a quantum computer composed of as many qubits as used in the circuit. In this work, we refute this conjecture and establish criteria for judging whether considering larger parts of the architecture might yield better solutions to the mapping problem. We show that determining subarchitectures that are of minimal size, i.e., from which no physical qubit can be removed without losing the optimal mapping solution for some quantum circuit, is a very hard problem. Based on a relaxation of the criteria for optimality, we introduce a relaxed consideration that still maintains optimality for practically relevant quantum circuits. Eventually, this results in two methods for computing near-optimal sets of subarchitectures—providing the basis for efficient quantum circuit mapping solutions. We demonstrate the benefits of this novel method for state-of-the-art quantum computers by IBM, Google, and Rigetti.

As state-of-the-art quantum computers are capable of running increasingly complex algorithms, the need for automated methods to design and test potential applications rises. Equivalence checking of quantum circuits is an important, yet hardly automated, task in the development of the quantum software stack. Recently, new methods have been proposed that tackle this problem from widely different perspectives. However, there is no established baseline on which to judge current and future progress in equivalence checking of quantum circuits. In order to close this gap, we conduct a detailed case study of two of the most promising equivalence checking methodologies---one based on decision diagrams and one based on the ZX-calculus---and compare their strengths and weaknesses.

Quantum computers promise to efficiently solve important problems classical computers never will. However, in order to capitalize on these prospects, a fully automated quantum software stack needs to be developed. This involves a multitude of complex tasks from the classical simulation of quantum circuits, over their compilation to specific devices, to the verification of the circuits to be executed as well as the obtained results. All of these tasks are highly non-trivial and necessitate efficient data structures to tackle the inherent complexity. Starting from rather straight-forward arrays over decision diagrams (inspired by the design automation community) to tensor networks and the ZX-calculus, various complementary approaches have been proposed. This work provides a look "under the hood" of today's tools and showcases how these means are utilized in them, e.g., for simulation, compilation, and verification of quantum circuits.

The classical simulation of quantum circuits is essential in the development and testing of quantum algorithms. Methods based on tensor networks or decision diagrams have proven to alleviate the inevitable exponential growth of the underlying complexity in many cases. But the complexity of these methods is very sensitive to so-called contraction plans or simulation paths, respectively, which define the order in which respective operations are applied. While, for tensor networks, a plethora of strategies has been developed, simulation based on decision diagrams is mostly conducted in a straight-forward fashion thus far. In this work, we envision a flow that allows to translate strategies from the domain of tensor networks to decision diagrams. Preliminary results indicate that a substantial advantage may be gained by employing suitable simulation paths-motivating a thorough consideration.

Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) techniques are well-established in classical computing where they are used to solve a broad variety of problems, e.g., in the design of classical circuits and systems. Analogous to the classical realm, quantum algorithms are usually modelled as circuits and similar design tasks need to be tackled. Thus, it is natural to pose the question whether these design tasks in the quantum realm can also be approached using SAT techniques. To the best of our knowledge, no SAT formulation for arbitrary quantum circuits exists and it is unknown whether such an approach is feasible at all. In this work, we define a propositional SAT encoding that, in principle, can be applied to arbitrary quantum circuits. However, we show that, due to the inherent complexity of representing quantum states, constructing such an encoding is not feasible in general. Therefore, we establish general criteria for determining the feasibility of the proposed encoding and identify classes of quantum circuits fulfilling these criteria. We explicitly demonstrate how the proposed encoding can be applied to the class of Clifford circuits as a representative. Finally, we empirically demonstrate the applicability and efficiency of the proposed encoding for Clifford circuits. With these results, we lay the foundation for continuing the ongoing success of SAT in classical circuit and systems design for quantum circuits.

With quantum computers promising advantages even in the near-term NISQ era, there is a lively community that develops software and toolkits for the design of corresponding quantum circuits. Although the underlying problems are different, expertise from the design automation community, which developed sophisticated design solutions for the conventional realm in the past decades, can help here. In this respect, decision diagrams provide a promising foundation for tackling many design tasks such as simulation, synthesis, and verification of quantum circuits. However, users of the corresponding tools often do not have a proper background or an intuition about how these methods based on decision diagrams work and what their strengths and limits are. In this work, we first review the concepts of how decision diagrams can be employed, e.g., for the simulation and verification of quantum circuits. Afterwards, in an effort to make decision diagrams for quantum computing more accessible, we then present a visualization tool for quantum decision diagrams, which allows users to explore the behavior of decision diagrams in the design tasks mentioned above. Finally, we present decision diagram-based tools for simulation and verification of quantum circuits using the methods discussed above as part of the open-source Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT)—a set of tools for quantum computing developed at the Technical University of Munich and the Johannes Kepler University Linz and released under the MIT license. More information about the corresponding tools is available at https://github.com/cda-tum/ddsim . By this, we provide an introduction of the concepts and tools for potential users who would like to work with them as well as potential developers aiming to extend them.

With the emergence of more and more applications for quantum computing, also the development of corresponding methods for design automation is receiving increasing interest. In this respect, decision diagrams provide a promising basis for many design tasks such as simulation, synthesis, verification, and more. However, users of the corresponding tools often do not have a proper background or an intuition about how these methods based on decision diagrams work and what their strengths and limits are. In an effort to make decision diagrams for quantum computing more accessible, we present a visualization tool which visualizes quantum decision diagrams and allows to explore their behavior when used in the design tasks mentioned above. The installation-free web-tool allows users to interactively learn how decision diagrams can be used in quantum computing, e.g., to (1) compactly represent quantum states and the functionality of quantum circuits, (2) to efficiently simulate quantum circuits, and (3) to verify the equivalence of two circuits. The tool is available at https://iic.jku.at/eda/research/quantum_dd/tool

Due to the significant progress made in the implementation of quantum hardware, efficient methods and tools to design corresponding algorithms become increasingly important. Many of these tools rely on functional representations of certain building blocks or even entire quantum algorithms which, however, inherently exhibit an exponential complexity. Although several alternative representations have been proposed to cope with this complexity, the construction of those representations remains a bottleneck. In this work, we propose solutions for efficiently constructing representations of quantum functionality based on the idea of conducting as many operations as possible on as small as possible intermediate representations -- using Decision Diagrams as a representative functional description. Experimental evaluations show that applying these solutions allows to construct the desired representations several factors faster than with state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, if repeating structures (which frequently occur in quantum algorithms) are explicitly exploited, exponential improvements are possible -- allowing to construct the functionality of certain algorithms within seconds, whereas the state of the art fails to construct it in an entire day.

Quantum computing is gaining considerable momentum through the recent progress in physical realizations of quantum computers. This led to rather sophisticated design flows in which the originally specified quantum functionality is compiled through different abstractions. This increasingly raises the question whether the respectively resulting quantum circuits indeed realize the originally intended function. Accordingly, efficient methods for equivalence checking are gaining importance. However, existing solutions still suffer from significant shortcomings such as their exponential worst case performance and an increased effort to obtain counterexamples in case of non-equivalence. In this work, we propose an improved DD-based equivalence checking approach which addresses these shortcomings. To this end, we utilize decision diagrams and exploit the fact that quantum operations are inherently reversible - allowing for dedicated strategies that keep the overhead moderate in many cases. Experimental results confirm that the proposed strategies lead to substantial speed-ups - allowing to perform equivalence checking of quantum circuits factors or even magnitudes faster than the state of the art.

The rapid rate of progress in the physical realization of quantum computers sparked the development of elaborate design flows for quantum computations on such devices. Each stage of these flows comes with its own representation of the intended functionality. Ensuring that each design step preserves this intended functionality is of utmost importance. However, existing solutions for equivalence checking of quantum computations heavily struggle with the complexity of the underlying problem and, thus, no conclusions on the equivalence may be reached with reasonable efforts in many cases. In this work, we uncover the power of simulation for equivalence checking in quantum computing. We show that, in contrast to classical computing, it is in general not necessary to compare the complete representation of the respective computations. Even small errors frequently affect the entire representation and, thus, can be detected within a couple of simulations. The resulting equivalence checking flow substantially improves upon the state of the art by drastically accelerating the detection of errors or providing a highly probable estimate of the operations' equivalence.

With quantum computers on the brink of practical applicability, there is a lively community that develops toolkits for the design of corresponding quantum circuits. Many of the problems to be tackled here are similar to design problems from the classical realm for which sophisticated design automation tools have been developed in the previous decades. In this paper, we present JKQ---a set of tools for quantum computing developed at the Johannes Kepler University (JKU) Linz which utilizes this design automation expertise. By this, we offer complementary approaches for many design problems in quantum computing such as simulation, compilation, or verification. In the following, we provide an introduction of the tools for potential users who would like to work with them as well as potential developers aiming to extend them.

High-level descriptions of quantum algorithms do not take the restrictions of physical hardware into account. Therefore actually executing an algorithm in the form of a quantum circuit on a quantum computer requires compiling it for the desired target architecture first. The compilation of quantum circuits depends on efficient methods to be feasible for all but the trivial instances. To this end, different compiling methods have been introduced in the past, but room for improvement still exists. Moreover, just an efficient compilation process itself is not sufficient-the resulting circuits must be correct as well. In this summary paper, we review how existing compilation approaches can be optimized by utilizing heuristic search algorithms or exact reasoning engines. Furthermore, we review how the correctness of the obtained results can be verified afterwards by clever data structures such as decision diagrams. This illustrates core steps of a compilation flow which can generate minimal or close-to-minimal results for many instances and, additionally, guarantees correctness throughout the process.

The recent progress in the physical realization of quantum computers (the first publicly available ones---IBM's QX architectures---have been launched in 2017) has motivated research on automatic methods that aid users in running quantum circuits on them. Here, certain physical constraints given by the architectures which restrict the allowed interactions of the involved qubits have to be satisfied. Thus far, this has been addressed by inserting SWAP and H operations. However, it remains unknown whether existing methods add a minimum number of SWAP and H operations or, if not, how far they are away from that minimum---an NP-complete problem. In this work, weaddress this by formulating the mapping task as a symbolic optimization problem that is solved using reasoning engines like Boolean satisfiability solvers. By this, we do not only provide a method that maps quantum circuits to IBM's QX architectures with a minimal number of SWAP and H operations, but also show by experimental evaluation that the number of operations added by IBM's heuristic solution exceeds the lower bound by more than 100% on average. An implementation of the proposed methodology is publicly available at http://iic.jku.at/eda/research/ibm_qx_mapping.