Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thomas Liao

dblp:241/5082 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot manipulation · 61% Reinforcement learning · 30% Optimization for machine learning · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › continuous control
controller learning
0.412019
Data-efficient Learning of Morphology and Controller for a Microrobot · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot design › robot mechanism design
morphology optimization
0.412019
Data-efficient Learning of Morphology and Controller for a Microrobot · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Robot manipulation
robot design
0.412019
Data-efficient Learning of Morphology and Controller for a Microrobot · ICRA 2019
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.112019
Data-efficient Learning of Morphology and Controller for a Microrobot · ICRA 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 0.4hierarchical bayesian optimization · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Data-efficient Learning of Morphology and Controller for a Microrobot
abstract
Robot design is often a slow and difficult process requiring the iterative construction and testing of prototypes, with the goal of sequentially optimizing the design. For most robots, this process is further complicated by the need, when validating the capabilities of the hardware to solve the desired task, to already have an appropriate controller, which is in turn designed and tuned for the specific hardware. In this paper, we propose a novel approach, HPC-BBO, to efficiently and automatically design hardware configurations, and evaluate them by also automatically tuning the corresponding controller. HPC-BBO is based on a hierarchical Bayesian optimization process which iteratively optimizes morphology configurations (based on the performance of the previous designs during the controller learning process) and subsequently learns the corresponding controllers (exploiting the knowledge collected from optimizing for previous morphologies). Moreover, HPC-BBO can select a “batch” of multiple morphology designs at once, thus parallelizing hardware validation and reducing the number of time-consuming production cycles. We validate HPC-BBO on the design of the morphology and controller for a simulated 6-legged microrobot. Experimental results show that HPC-BBO outperforms multiple competitive baselines, and yields a 360% reduction in production cycles over standard Bayesian optimization, thus reducing the hypothetical manufacturing time of our microrobot from 21 to 4 months.
Thomas Liao, Grant Wang, Brian H. Yang, Rene Lee, Kristofer S. J. Pister, Sergey Levine, Roberto Calandra
ICRA1