Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Thomas Liao
dblp:241/5082
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot manipulation · 61% Reinforcement learning · 30% Optimization for machine learning · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › continuous control
controller learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Data-efficient Learning of Morphology and Controller for a Microrobot · ICRA 2019 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot design › robot mechanism design
morphology optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Data-efficient Learning of Morphology and Controller for a Microrobot · ICRA 2019 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
robot design |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Data-efficient Learning of Morphology and Controller for a Microrobot · ICRA 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Data-efficient Learning of Morphology and Controller for a Microrobot · ICRA 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 0.4hierarchical bayesian optimization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Data-efficient Learning of Morphology and Controller for a MicrorobotabstractRobot design is often a slow and difficult process requiring the iterative construction and testing of prototypes, with the goal of sequentially optimizing the design. For most robots, this process is further complicated by the need, when validating the capabilities of the hardware to solve the desired task, to already have an appropriate controller, which is in turn designed and tuned for the specific hardware. In this paper, we propose a novel approach, HPC-BBO, to efficiently and automatically design hardware configurations, and evaluate them by also automatically tuning the corresponding controller. HPC-BBO is based on a hierarchical Bayesian optimization process which iteratively optimizes morphology configurations (based on the performance of the previous designs during the controller learning process) and subsequently learns the corresponding controllers (exploiting the knowledge collected from optimizing for previous morphologies). Moreover, HPC-BBO can select a “batch” of multiple morphology designs at once, thus parallelizing hardware validation and reducing the number of time-consuming production cycles. We validate HPC-BBO on the design of the morphology and controller for a simulated 6-legged microrobot. Experimental results show that HPC-BBO outperforms multiple competitive baselines, and yields a 360% reduction in production cycles over standard Bayesian optimization, thus reducing the hypothetical manufacturing time of our microrobot from 21 to 4 months. Thomas Liao, Grant Wang, Brian H. Yang, Rene Lee, Kristofer S. J. Pister, Sergey Levine, Roberto Calandra |
ICRA | 1 |