Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Isaac Dunn

dblp:241/5109 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-1911-7164ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Robot navigation and mapping · 50%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
fault detection
0.512021
Exposing previously undetectable faults in deep neural networks · ISSTA 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.512021
Exposing previously undetectable faults in deep neural networks · ISSTA 2021
Software testing
deep learning testing
0.512021
Exposing previously undetectable faults in deep neural networks · ISSTA 2021
Software testing
test input generation
0.512021
Exposing previously undetectable faults in deep neural networks · ISSTA 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

generative machine learning · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Exposing previously undetectable faults in deep neural networks
abstract
Existing methods for testing DNNs solve the oracle problem by constraining the raw features (e.g. image pixel values) to be within a small distance of a dataset example for which the desired DNN output is known. But this limits the kinds of faults these approaches are able to detect. In this paper, we introduce a novel DNN testing method that is able to find faults in DNNs that other methods cannot. The crux is that, by leveraging generative machine learning, we can generate fresh test inputs that vary in their high-level features (for images, these include object shape, location, texture, and colour). We demonstrate that our approach is capable of detecting deliberately injected faults as well as new faults in state-of-the-art DNNs, and that in both cases, existing methods are unable to find these faults.
Isaac Dunn, Hadrien Pouget, Daniel Kroening, Tom Melham
ISSTA1