Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nir Bachrach

dblp:241/7018 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 41% Computational complexity · 27% Mathematical optimization · 14%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
revenue maximization
0.612022
Distributional Robustness: From Pricing to Auctions · EC 2022
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design
robust mechanism design
0.612022
Distributional Robustness: From Pricing to Auctions · EC 2022
Computational complexity
communication complexity
0.412019
Hardness of Distributed Optimization · PODC 2019
Distributed computing theory › distributed graph algorithms
CONGEST model
0.412019
Hardness of Distributed Optimization · PODC 2019
Mathematical optimization
distributed optimization
0.412019
Hardness of Distributed Optimization · PODC 2019
Computational complexity
lower bounds
0.412019
Hardness of Distributed Optimization · PODC 2019
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph optimization
0.112019
Hardness of Distributed Optimization · PODC 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

zero-sum game analysis · 0.6worst-case distribution · 0.6lower bound proof · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Distributional Robustness: From Pricing to Auctions
abstract
We study robust mechanism design for revenue maximization when selling a single item in an auction, assuming that only the mean of the value distribution and an upper bound on the bidders' valuations for the item are known. Robust mechanism design is a rising alternative to Bayesian mechanism design, which yields designs that do not rely on assumptions like full distributional knowledge, but rather only partial knowledge of the distributions. We seek a mechanism that maximizes revenue over the worst-case distribution compatible with the known parameters. Such a mechanism arises as an equilibrium of a zero-sum game between the seller and an adversary who chooses the distribution, and so can be referred to as the max-min mechanism.
Nir Bachrach, Inbal Talgam-Cohen
EC1
2019 Hardness of Distributed Optimization
abstract
This paper studies lower bounds for fundamental optimization problems in the CONGEST model. We show that solving problems exactly in this model can be a hard task, by providing tildeΩmega (n2) lower bounds for cornerstone problems, such as minimum dominating set (MDS), Hamiltonian path, Steiner tree and max-cut. These are almost tight, since all of these problems can be solved optimally in O(n2) rounds. Moreover, we show that even in bounded-degree graphs and even in simple graphs with maximum degree 5 and logarithmic diameter, it holds that various tasks, such as finding a maximum independent set (MaxIS) or a minimum vertex cover, are still difficult, requiring a near-tight number of tildeΩ (n) rounds.
Nir Bachrach, Keren Censor-Hillel, Michal Dory, Yuval Efron, Dean Leitersdorf, Ami Paz
PODC1