Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nir Bachrach
dblp:241/7018
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 41% Computational complexity · 27% Mathematical optimization · 14% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
revenue maximization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Distributional Robustness: From Pricing to Auctions · EC 2022 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design
robust mechanism design |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Distributional Robustness: From Pricing to Auctions · EC 2022 |
Computational complexity
communication complexity |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Hardness of Distributed Optimization · PODC 2019 |
Distributed computing theory › distributed graph algorithms
CONGEST model |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Hardness of Distributed Optimization · PODC 2019 |
Mathematical optimization
distributed optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Hardness of Distributed Optimization · PODC 2019 |
Computational complexity
lower bounds |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Hardness of Distributed Optimization · PODC 2019 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Hardness of Distributed Optimization · PODC 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
zero-sum game analysis · 0.6worst-case distribution · 0.6lower bound proof · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Distributional Robustness: From Pricing to AuctionsabstractWe study robust mechanism design for revenue maximization when selling a single item in an auction, assuming that only the mean of the value distribution and an upper bound on the bidders' valuations for the item are known. Robust mechanism design is a rising alternative to Bayesian mechanism design, which yields designs that do not rely on assumptions like full distributional knowledge, but rather only partial knowledge of the distributions. We seek a mechanism that maximizes revenue over the worst-case distribution compatible with the known parameters. Such a mechanism arises as an equilibrium of a zero-sum game between the seller and an adversary who chooses the distribution, and so can be referred to as the max-min mechanism. Nir Bachrach, Inbal Talgam-Cohen |
EC | 1 |
| 2019 | Hardness of Distributed OptimizationabstractThis paper studies lower bounds for fundamental optimization problems in the CONGEST model. We show that solving problems exactly in this model can be a hard task, by providing tildeΩmega (n2) lower bounds for cornerstone problems, such as minimum dominating set (MDS), Hamiltonian path, Steiner tree and max-cut. These are almost tight, since all of these problems can be solved optimally in O(n2) rounds. Moreover, we show that even in bounded-degree graphs and even in simple graphs with maximum degree 5 and logarithmic diameter, it holds that various tasks, such as finding a maximum independent set (MaxIS) or a minimum vertex cover, are still difficult, requiring a near-tight number of tildeΩ (n) rounds. Nir Bachrach, Keren Censor-Hillel, Michal Dory, Yuval Efron, Dean Leitersdorf, Ami Paz |
PODC | 1 |