Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Niels Bruun Ipsen

dblp:241/7122 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 60% Learning paradigms · 12% Generative modeling · 11%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
missing data
1.122022
How to deal with missing data in supervised deep learning? · ICLR 2022
not-MIWAE: Deep Generative Modelling with Missing not at Random Data · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › missing data
missing data imputation
1.122022
How to deal with missing data in supervised deep learning? · ICLR 2022
not-MIWAE: Deep Generative Modelling with Missing not at Random Data · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
supervised learning
0.612022
How to deal with missing data in supervised deep learning? · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › missing data
missing not at random
0.512021
not-MIWAE: Deep Generative Modelling with Missing not at Random Data · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.512021
not-MIWAE: Deep Generative Modelling with Missing not at Random Data · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory › statistical physics of learning
phase transition analysis
0.412019
Phase transition in PCA with missing data: Reduced signal-to-noise ratio, not sample size! · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
principal component analysis
0.412019
Phase transition in PCA with missing data: Reduced signal-to-noise ratio, not sample size! · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › latent gaussian model
probabilistic PCA
0.112019
Phase transition in PCA with missing data: Reduced signal-to-noise ratio, not sample size! · ICML 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

signal-to-noise ratio analysis · 0.4probabilistic principal component analysis · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 How to deal with missing data in supervised deep learning?
Niels Bruun Ipsen, Pierre-Alexandre Mattei, Jes Frellsen
ICLR1
2021 not-MIWAE: Deep Generative Modelling with Missing not at Random Data
Niels Bruun Ipsen, Pierre-Alexandre Mattei, Jes Frellsen
ICLR1
2019 Phase transition in PCA with missing data: Reduced signal-to-noise ratio, not sample size!
abstract
How does missing data affect our ability to learn signal structures? It has been shown that learning signal structure in terms of principal components is dependent on the ratio of sample size and dimensionality and that a critical number of observations is needed before learning starts (Biehl and Mietzner, 1993). Here we generalize this analysis to include missing data. Probabilistic principal component analysis is regularly used for estimating signal structures in datasets with missing data. Our analytic result suggest that the effect of missing data is to effectively reduce signal-to-noise ratio rather than - as generally believed - to reduce sample size. The theory predicts a phase transition in the learning curves and this is indeed found both in simulation data and in real datasets.
Niels Bruun Ipsen, Lars Kai Hansen
ICML1