Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tristan Yang

dblp:241/9589 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 81% Deep learning architectures and training · 19%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › over-parameterization
double descent
0.412020
Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurt · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization
0.412019
SGD on Neural Networks Learns Functions of Increasing Complexity · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
over-parameterized regime
0.412019
SGD on Neural Networks Learns Functions of Increasing Complexity · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training optimization
stochastic gradient descent dynamics
0.412019
SGD on Neural Networks Learns Functions of Increasing Complexity · NeurIPS 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear classifier probing · 0.4conditional mutual information · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurt
Preetum Nakkiran, Gal Kaplun, Yamini Bansal, Tristan Yang, Boaz Barak, Ilya Sutskever
ICLR4
2019 SGD on Neural Networks Learns Functions of Increasing Complexity
abstract
We perform an experimental study of the dynamics of Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) in learning deep neural networks for several real and synthetic classification tasks. We show that in the initial epochs, almost all of the performance improvement of the classifier obtained by SGD can be explained by a linear classifier. More generally, we give evidence for the hypothesis that, as iterations progress, SGD learns functions of increasing complexity. This hypothesis can be helpful in explaining why SGD-learned classifiers tend to generalize well even in the over-parameterized regime. We also show that the linear classifier learned in the initial stages is ``retained'' throughout the execution even if training is continued to the point of zero training error, and complement this with a theoretical result in a simplified model. Key to our work is a new measure of how well one classifier explains the performance of another, based on conditional mutual information.
Preetum Nakkiran, Gal Kaplun, Dimitris Kalimeris, Tristan Yang, Benjamin L. Edelman, Fred Zhang, Boaz Barak
NeurIPS4