Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Emilio J. Almazán

dblp:241/9617 · also Emilio J. Almazan · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0008-1583-3749ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 67% Language models and text generation · 33%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data integration and cleaning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
natural language understanding
0.712023
LEA: Improving Sentence Similarity Robustness to Typos Using Lexical Attention Bias · KDD 2023
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text similarity › semantic similarity
sentence similarity
0.712023
LEA: Improving Sentence Similarity Robustness to Typos Using Lexical Attention Bias · KDD 2023
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
textual entailment
0.712023
LEA: Improving Sentence Similarity Robustness to Typos Using Lexical Attention Bias · KDD 2023
Image and video processing › pattern detection › curve detection
line segment detection
0.312017
MCMLSD: A Dynamic Programming Approach to Line Segment Detection · CVPR 2017
Data integration and cleaning › entity matching
product matching
0.212023
LEA: Improving Sentence Similarity Robustness to Typos Using Lexical Attention Bias · KDD 2023
Algorithms and data structures
dynamic programming
0.112017
MCMLSD: A Dynamic Programming Approach to Line Segment Detection · CVPR 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transformer · 1.3lexical attention bias · 1.3cross-encoder · 1.3probabilistic hough transform · 0.6markov chain · 0.6dynamic programming · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 LEA: Improving Sentence Similarity Robustness to Typos Using Lexical Attention Bias
abstract
Textual noise, such as typos or abbreviations, is a well-known issue that penalizes vanilla Transformers for most downstream tasks. We show that this is also the case for sentence similarity, a fundamental task in multiple domains, e.g. matching, retrieval or paraphrasing. Sentence similarity can be approached using cross-encoders, where the two sentences are concatenated in the input allowing the model to exploit the inter-relations between them. Previous works addressing the noise issue mainly rely on data augmentation strategies, showing improved robustness when dealing with corrupted samples that are similar to the ones used for training. However, all these methods still suffer from the token distribution shift induced by typos. In this work, we propose to tackle textual noise by equipping cross-encoders with a novel LExical-aware Attention module (LEA) that incorporates lexical similarities between words in both sentences. By using raw text similarities, our approach avoids the tokenization shift problem obtaining improved robustness. We demonstrate that the attention bias introduced by LEA helps cross-encoders to tackle complex scenarios with textual noise, specially in domains with short-text descriptions and limited context. Experiments using three popular Transformer encoders in five e-commerce datasets for product matching show that LEA consistently boosts performance under the presence of noise, while remaining competitive on the original (clean) splits. We also evaluate our approach in two datasets for textual entailment and paraphrasing showing that LEA is robust to typos in domains with longer sentences and more natural context. Additionally, we thoroughly analyze several design choices in our approach, providing insights about the impact of the decisions made and fostering future research in cross-encoders dealing with typos.
Mario Almagro-Cádiz, Emilio J. Almazán, Diego Ortego, David Jiménez
KDD2
2017 MCMLSD: A Dynamic Programming Approach to Line Segment Detection
abstract
Prior approaches to line segment detection typically involve perceptual grouping in the image domain or global accumulation in the Hough domain. Here we propose a probabilistic algorithm that merges the advantages of both approaches. In a first stage lines are detected using a global probabilistic Hough approach. In the second stage each detected line is analyzed in the image domain to localize the line segments that generated the peak in the Hough map. By limiting search to a line, the distribution of segments over the sequence of points on the line can be modeled as a Markov chain, and a probabilistically optimal labelling can be computed exactly using a standard dynamic programming algorithm, in linear time. The Markov assumption also leads to an intuitive ranking method that uses the local marginal posterior probabilities to estimate the expected number of correctly labelled points on a segment. To assess the resulting Markov Chain Marginal Line Segment Detector (MCMLSD) we develop and apply a novel quantitative evaluation methodology that controls for under-and over-segmentation. Evaluation on the YorkUrbanDB dataset shows that the proposed MCMLSD method outperforms the state-of-the-art by a substantial margin.
Emilio J. Almazán, Ron Tal, Yiming Qian, James H. Elder
CVPR1
2016 Evaluating features and classifiers for road weather condition analysis
abstract
Weather-dependent road conditions are a major factor in many automobile incidents; computer vision algorithms for automatic classification of road conditions can thus be of great benefit. This paper presents a system for classification of road conditions using still-frames taken from an uncalibrated dashboard camera. The problem is challenging due to variability in camera placement, road layout, weather and illumination conditions. The system uses a prior distribution of road pixel locations learned from training data then fuses normalized luminance and texture features probabilistically to categorize the segmented road surface. We attain an accuracy of 80% for binary classification (bare vs. snow/ice-covered) and 68% for 3 classes (dry vs. wet vs. snow/ice-covered) on a challenging dataset, suggesting that a useful system may be viable.
Yiming Qian, Emilio J. Almazán, James H. Elder
ICIP2