Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Emilio J. Almazán
dblp:241/9617 · also Emilio J. Almazan
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0008-1583-3749ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 67% Language models and text generation · 33% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data integration and cleaning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
natural language understanding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | LEA: Improving Sentence Similarity Robustness to Typos Using Lexical Attention Bias · KDD 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text similarity › semantic similarity
sentence similarity |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | LEA: Improving Sentence Similarity Robustness to Typos Using Lexical Attention Bias · KDD 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
textual entailment |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | LEA: Improving Sentence Similarity Robustness to Typos Using Lexical Attention Bias · KDD 2023 |
Image and video processing › pattern detection › curve detection
line segment detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | MCMLSD: A Dynamic Programming Approach to Line Segment Detection · CVPR 2017 |
Data integration and cleaning › entity matching
product matching |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | LEA: Improving Sentence Similarity Robustness to Typos Using Lexical Attention Bias · KDD 2023 |
Algorithms and data structures
dynamic programming |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | MCMLSD: A Dynamic Programming Approach to Line Segment Detection · CVPR 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 1.3lexical attention bias · 1.3cross-encoder · 1.3probabilistic hough transform · 0.6markov chain · 0.6dynamic programming · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | LEA: Improving Sentence Similarity Robustness to Typos Using Lexical Attention BiasabstractTextual noise, such as typos or abbreviations, is a well-known issue that penalizes vanilla Transformers for most downstream tasks. We show that this is also the case for sentence similarity, a fundamental task in multiple domains, e.g. matching, retrieval or paraphrasing. Sentence similarity can be approached using cross-encoders, where the two sentences are concatenated in the input allowing the model to exploit the inter-relations between them. Previous works addressing the noise issue mainly rely on data augmentation strategies, showing improved robustness when dealing with corrupted samples that are similar to the ones used for training. However, all these methods still suffer from the token distribution shift induced by typos. In this work, we propose to tackle textual noise by equipping cross-encoders with a novel LExical-aware Attention module (LEA) that incorporates lexical similarities between words in both sentences. By using raw text similarities, our approach avoids the tokenization shift problem obtaining improved robustness. We demonstrate that the attention bias introduced by LEA helps cross-encoders to tackle complex scenarios with textual noise, specially in domains with short-text descriptions and limited context. Experiments using three popular Transformer encoders in five e-commerce datasets for product matching show that LEA consistently boosts performance under the presence of noise, while remaining competitive on the original (clean) splits. We also evaluate our approach in two datasets for textual entailment and paraphrasing showing that LEA is robust to typos in domains with longer sentences and more natural context. Additionally, we thoroughly analyze several design choices in our approach, providing insights about the impact of the decisions made and fostering future research in cross-encoders dealing with typos. Mario Almagro-Cádiz, Emilio J. Almazán, Diego Ortego, David Jiménez |
KDD | 2 |
| 2017 | MCMLSD: A Dynamic Programming Approach to Line Segment DetectionabstractPrior approaches to line segment detection typically involve perceptual grouping in the image domain or global accumulation in the Hough domain. Here we propose a probabilistic algorithm that merges the advantages of both approaches. In a first stage lines are detected using a global probabilistic Hough approach. In the second stage each detected line is analyzed in the image domain to localize the line segments that generated the peak in the Hough map. By limiting search to a line, the distribution of segments over the sequence of points on the line can be modeled as a Markov chain, and a probabilistically optimal labelling can be computed exactly using a standard dynamic programming algorithm, in linear time. The Markov assumption also leads to an intuitive ranking method that uses the local marginal posterior probabilities to estimate the expected number of correctly labelled points on a segment. To assess the resulting Markov Chain Marginal Line Segment Detector (MCMLSD) we develop and apply a novel quantitative evaluation methodology that controls for under-and over-segmentation. Evaluation on the YorkUrbanDB dataset shows that the proposed MCMLSD method outperforms the state-of-the-art by a substantial margin. Emilio J. Almazán, Ron Tal, Yiming Qian, James H. Elder |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2016 | Evaluating features and classifiers for road weather condition analysisabstractWeather-dependent road conditions are a major factor in many automobile incidents; computer vision algorithms for automatic classification of road conditions can thus be of great benefit. This paper presents a system for classification of road conditions using still-frames taken from an uncalibrated dashboard camera. The problem is challenging due to variability in camera placement, road layout, weather and illumination conditions. The system uses a prior distribution of road pixel locations learned from training data then fuses normalized luminance and texture features probabilistically to categorize the segmented road surface. We attain an accuracy of 80% for binary classification (bare vs. snow/ice-covered) and 68% for 3 classes (dry vs. wet vs. snow/ice-covered) on a challenging dataset, suggesting that a useful system may be viable. Yiming Qian, Emilio J. Almazán, James H. Elder |
ICIP | 2 |