Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Julien Horwood

dblp:241/9649 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 60% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 40%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
causal explanation
0.812024
Feature Attribution with Necessity and Sufficiency via Dual-stage Perturbation Test for Causal Explanation · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
0.812024
Feature Attribution with Necessity and Sufficiency via Dual-stage Perturbation Test for Causal Explanation · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal sufficiency and necessity
0.812024
Feature Attribution with Necessity and Sufficiency via Dual-stage Perturbation Test for Causal Explanation · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
feature attribution
0.812024
Feature Attribution with Necessity and Sufficiency via Dual-stage Perturbation Test for Causal Explanation · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.812024
Feature Attribution with Necessity and Sufficiency via Dual-stage Perturbation Test for Causal Explanation · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

resampling · 0.8perturbation test · 0.8counterfactual reasoning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Feature Attribution with Necessity and Sufficiency via Dual-stage Perturbation Test for Causal Explanation
abstract
We investigate the problem of explainability for machine learning models, focusing on Feature Attribution Methods (FAMs) that evaluate feature importance through perturbation tests. Despite their utility, FAMs struggle to distinguish the contributions of different features, when their prediction changes are similar after perturbation. To enhance FAMs’ discriminative power, we introduce Feature Attribution with Necessity and Sufficiency (FANS), which find a neighborhood of the input such that perturbing samples within this neighborhood have a high Probability of being Necessity and Sufficiency (PNS) cause for the change in predictions, and use this PNS as the importance of the feature. Specifically, FANS compute this PNS via a heuristic strategy for estimating the neighborhood and a perturbation test involving two stages (factual and interventional) for counterfactual reasoning. To generate counterfactual samples, we use a resampling-based approach on the observed samples to approximate the required conditional distribution. We demonstrate that FANS outperforms existing attribution methods on six benchmarks. Please refer to the source code via https://github.com/DMIRLAB-Group/FANS.
Xuexin Chen, Ruichu Cai, Zhengting Huang, Yuxuan Zhu 0001, Julien Horwood, Zhifeng Hao 0004, Zijian Li 0001, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato
ICML5