Air pollution poses significant health, social, and economic risks, necessitating effective communication to promote awareness and behavioural adaptation. This study explores how combining behavioural and science communication strategies shapes stakeholder participation in co-designing air quality (AQ) communication technologies and how stakeholders engage with, represent and negotiate environmental data and issues. Data was collected across 11 workshops involving 169 participants of different ages, combining education, storytelling, user testing and participatory design to foster learning and dialogue. Findings highlight that AQ communication is entangled with questions of data usability, trust and environmental literacy. Participants emphasised the importance of audience-specific AQ messaging, integrating AQ technical data with comprehensible visualisations, and combining persuasive communication with evidence-based information. Tensions emerged between individual adaptive behaviours and structural barriers, reinforcing the socio-ecological complexity of AQ communication. Challenges included involving underrepresented groups and assessing long-term impacts of interventions. The findings offer insights into how public engagement can be utilised to inform the design of an AQ communication technology to support protective and sustainable behaviours. Future research should explore ways to enhance inclusivity, refine message design for different user groups, and assess the impact of participatory AQ communication initiatives.

Recent HCI scholarship has critiqued anthropocentrism in design as contributing to the ecological crisis. The current paper contributes theoretically and empirically to this area, adopting the lens of Socio-Ecological Relations, inspired by Environmental History and STS. We argue that a socio-ecological lens can offer practical tools to HCI and Interaction Design to overcome the separation between humanity and nature-as-a-resource. For this reason, our unit of analysis is humanity-in-nature and nature-in-humanity, and we show how this double internality becomes visible using an historical and geographical approach in the design process. Methodologically, using Situational Analysis, we analyse an Action Research project that introduced a digital platform for community radio in rural contexts. We find that Socio-Ecological Relations, performed in specific places, shape the design process and are themselves transformed by becoming part of it. We provide a set of sensitivities for operationalizing this approach for design researchers.

Licencing frameworks are embedded with sociotechnical imaginaries that limit the potential for networked technologies to make traditional media forms, like radio, more inclusive. We sought to refine and extend a platform, RootIO, which aims to enable diverse people to run small radio stations by using internet and mobile networks that avoid the costs of studios and specialist equipment. We situated design and refinement in the activities of groups that set up and ran four community stations in rural Romania and some Irish islands over three-years and found national regulations limited who articulated requirements. Activities in applying for, and complying with, licences shaped design priorities, embedded temporal demands, certain organisational structures and division of responsibilities, and assumptions about studios and professionalism. Indeed, small radio stations are subject to the same values as large media corporations that pursue market power. Regulatory frameworks are specific to nations and media form, yet our analysis illustrates that they impede designing platforms to widen inclusion by enacting broader sociotechnical imaginaries. We hope this reflection provokes discussion, in HCI and CSCW, about our responsibilities in engaging with the policies that shape possible futures.

This article contributes to research that aims to better understand and describe the rural context for rural computing. We argue that the particularities of rurality are heightened by the experience of ‘islandness’. We report on our experiences of engaging on one small island as islanders established community radio using a novel platform. Data comes from 12 semi-structured interviews with community members and ethnographic field notes assembled through eight researcher visits to the island. Transcripts and notes were analysed using thematic analysis. We discuss how rural islandness as a socio-cultural lens influenced technology appropriation and factors to support participation. We explore the elements of rural islandness that can be used as an analytic tool for rural HCI and HCI more broadly, through three main contributions of rural islandness that we believe have not yet been sufficiently explored in HCI. These are (1) separateness, (2) pushing things ahead, and (3) publics and rural pluralities.