Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrey Taptunov

dblp:242/5166 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Data integration and cleaning · 80% Data stream processing · 20%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data integration and cleaning
data quality
0.412019
DataWig: Missing Value Imputation for Tables · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019
Data stream processing
incremental validation
0.412019
Unit Testing Data with Deequ · SIGMOD Conference 2019
Data integration and cleaning › missing data
missing value imputation
0.412019
DataWig: Missing Value Imputation for Tables · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

monoid · 0.4hyperparameter tuning · 0.4deep learning feature extraction · 0.4declarative constraint API · 0.4apache spark · 0.4anomaly detection on quality metrics · 0.4algebraic state · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Differential Data Quality Verification on Partitioned Data
abstract
Modern companies and institutions rely on data to guide every single decision. Missing or incorrect information seriously compromises any decision process. In previous work, we presented Deequ, a Spark-based library for automating the verification of data quality at scale. Deequ provides a declarative API, which combines common quality constraints with user-defined validation code, and thereby enables "unit tests for data". However, we found that the previous computational model of Deequ is not flexible enough for many scenarios in modern data pipelines, which handle large, partitioned datasets. Such scenarios require the evaluation of dataset-level quality constraints after individual partition updates, without having to re-read already processed partitions. Additionally, such scenarios often require the verification of data quality on select combinations of partitions. We therefore present a differential generalization of the computational model of Deequ, based on algebraic states with monoid properties. We detail how to efficiently implement the corresponding operators and aggregation functions in Apache Spark. Furthermore, we show how to optimize the resulting workloads to minimize the required number of passes over the data, and empirically validate that our approach decreases the runtimes for updating data metrics under data changes and for different combinations of partitions.
Sebastian Schelter, Stefan Grafberger, Philipp Schmidt 0002, Tammo Rukat, Mario Kießling, Andrey Taptunov, Felix Bießmann, Dustin Lange
ICDE6
2019 Unit Testing Data with Deequ
abstract
Modern companies and institutions rely on data to guide every single decision. Missing or incorrect information seriously compromises any decision process. We demonstrate "Deequ", an Apache Spark-based library for automating the verification of data quality at scale. This library provides a declarative API, which combines common quality constraints with user-defined validation code, and thereby enables "unit tests for data". Deequ is available as open source, meets the requirements of production use cases at Amazon, and scales to datasets with billions of records if the constraints to evaluate are chosen carefully. Our demonstration walks attendees through a fictitious business use case of validating daily product reviews from a public dataset, and is executed in a proprietary interactive notebook environment. We show attendees how to define data unit tests from automatically suggested constraints and how to create customized tests. Additionally, we demonstrate how to apply Deequ to validate incrementally growing datasets, and give examples of how to configure anomaly detection algorithms on time series of data quality metrics to further automate the data validation.
Sebastian Schelter, Felix Bießmann, Dustin Lange, Tammo Rukat, Philipp Schmidt 0002, Stephan Seufert, Pierre Brunelle, Andrey Taptunov
SIGMOD Conference8
2019 DataWig: Missing Value Imputation for Tables
abstract
With the growing importance of machine learning (ML) algorithms for practical applications, reducing data quality problems in ML pipelines has become a major focus of research. In many cases missing values can break data pipelines which makes completeness one of the most impactful data quality challenges. Current missing value imputation methods are focusing on numerical or categorical data and can be difficult to scale to datasets with millions of rows. We release DataWig, a robust and scalable approach for missing value imputation that can be applied to tables with heterogeneous data types, including unstructured text. DataWig combines deep learning feature extractors with automatic hyperparameter tuning. This enables users without a machine learning background, such as data engineers, to impute missing values with minimal effort in tables with more heterogeneous data types than supported in existing libraries, while requiring less glue code for feature engineering and offering more flexible modelling options. We demonstrate that DataWig compares favourably to existing imputation packages. Source code, documentation, and unit tests for this package are available at: https://github.com/awslabs/datawig
Felix Bießmann, Tammo Rukat, Philipp Schmidt 0002, Prathik Naidu, Sebastian Schelter, Andrey Taptunov, Dustin Lange, David Salinas
J. Mach. Learn. Res.6