Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Telmo Pires

dblp:242/7817 · also Telmo Pessoa Pires · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Machine translation · 42% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 20% Language models and text generation · 13%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation
0.812024
SaulLM-54B & SaulLM-141B: Scaling Up Domain Adaptation for the Legal Domain · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.812024
SaulLM-54B & SaulLM-141B: Scaling Up Domain Adaptation for the Legal Domain · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › neural machine translation
multilingual neural machine translation
0.712023
Learning Language-Specific Layers for Multilingual Machine Translation · ACL (1) 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.712023
Learning Language-Specific Layers for Multilingual Machine Translation · ACL (1) 2023
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
machine translation evaluation
0.612022
Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation: A Call for Clarity · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
neural machine translation
0.612022
Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation: A Call for Clarity · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › neural machine translation
non-autoregressive machine translation
0.612022
Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation: A Call for Clarity · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › text embedding › text representation learning
cross-lingual representation learning
0.412019
How Multilingual is Multilingual BERT? · ACL (1) 2019
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-lingual transfer
0.412019
How Multilingual is Multilingual BERT? · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
linguistic probing
0.412019
How Multilingual is Multilingual BERT? · ACL (1) 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

synthetic data generation · 0.8instruction tuning · 0.8continued pretraining · 0.8alignment · 0.8neural architecture search · 0.7length prediction · 0.6CTC-based architecture · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 SaulLM-54B & SaulLM-141B: Scaling Up Domain Adaptation for the Legal Domain
abstract
In this paper, we introduce SaulLM-medium and SaulLM-large, two large language models (LLMs) families tailored for the legal sector. These models, which feature architectures of 54 billion and 140 billion parameters, respectively, are based on the Mixtral architecture. The development of SaulLM-54B and SaulLM-140B is guided by large-scale domain adaptation, divided into strategies: (1) the exploitation of continued pretaining involving a legal corpus that includes over $400$ billion tokens, (2) the implementation of a specialized legal instruction-following protocol, and (3) the alignment of model outputs with human preferences in legal interpretations. The integration of synthetically generated data in the second and third steps enhances the models' capabilities in interpreting and processing legal texts, effectively reaching state-of-the-art performance and outperforming all previous open-source models on LegalBench Instruct. This research thoroughly explores the trade-offs involved in domain-specific adaptation at this scale, offering insights that may inform future studies on domain adaptation using strong decoder models. Building upon SaulLM-7B, this study refines the approach to produce an LLM better equipped for legal tasks and domains. Additionally, we release base, instruct and aligned versions on top of SaulLM-medium and SaulLM-large under the MIT License to facilitate reuse and collaborative research.
Pierre Colombo, Telmo Pires, Malik Boudiaf, Rui Melo, Gabriel Hautreux, Etienne Malaboeuf, Johanne Charpentier, Dominic Culver, Michael Desa
NeurIPS2
2023 Learning Language-Specific Layers for Multilingual Machine Translation
abstract
Multilingual Machine Translation promises to improve translation quality between non-English languages.This is advantageous for several reasons, namely lower latency (no need to translate twice), and reduced error cascades (e.g., avoiding losing gender and formality information when translating through English).On the downside, adding more languages reduces model capacity per language, which is usually countered by increasing the overall model size, making training harder and inference slower.In this work, we introduce Language-Specific Transformer Layers (LSLs), which allow us to increase model capacity, while keeping the amount of computation and the number of parameters used in the forward pass constant.The key idea is to have some layers of the encoder be source or target language-specific, while keeping the remaining layers shared.We study the best way to place these layers using a neural architecture search inspired approach, and achieve an improvement of 1.3 CHRF (1.5 SPBLEU) points over not using LSLs on a separate decoder architecture, and 1.9 CHRF (2.2 SPBLEU) on a shared decoder one.
Telmo Pires, Robin M. Schmidt, Yi-Hsiu Liao, Stephan Peitz
ACL (1)1
2023 State Spaces Aren't Enough: Machine Translation Needs Attention
abstract
Structured State Spaces for Sequences (S4) is a recently proposed sequence model with successful applications in various tasks, e.g. vision, language modelling, and audio. Thanks to its mathematical formulation, it compresses its input to a single hidden state, and is able to capture long range dependencies while avoiding the need for an attention mechanism. In this work, we apply S4 to Machine Translation (MT), and evaluate several encoder-decoder variants on WMT’14 and WMT’16. In contrast with the success in language modeling, we find that S4 lags behind the Transformer by approximately 4 BLEU points, and that it counter-intuitively struggles with long sentences. Finally, we show that this gap is caused by S4’s inability to summarize the full source sentence in a single hidden state, and show that we can close the gap by introducing an attention mechanism.
Ali Vardasbi, Telmo Pires, Robin M. Schmidt, Stephan Peitz
EAMT2
2022 Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation: A Call for Clarity
abstract
Non-autoregressive approaches aim to improve the inference speed of translation models by only requiring a single forward pass to generate the output sequence instead of iteratively producing each predicted token.Consequently, their translation quality still tends to be inferior to their autoregressive counterparts due to several issues involving output token interdependence.In this work, we take a step back and revisit several techniques that have been proposed for improving non-autoregressive translation models and compare their combined translation quality and speed implications under thirdparty testing environments.We provide novel insights for establishing strong baselines using length prediction or CTC-based architecture variants and contribute standardized BLEU, CHRF++, and TER scores using sacreBLEU on four translation tasks, which crucially have been missing as inconsistencies in the use of tokenized BLEU lead to deviations of up to 1.7 BLEU points.Our open-sourced code is integrated into fairseq for reproducibility. 1
Robin M. Schmidt, Telmo Pires, Stephan Peitz, Jonas Lööf
EMNLP2
2019 How Multilingual is Multilingual BERT?
abstract
In this paper, we show that Multilingual BERT (M-BERT), released by Devlin et al. (2019) as a single language model pre-trained from monolingual corpora in 104 languages, is surprisingly good at zero-shot cross-lingual model transfer, in which task-specific annotations in one language are used to fine-tune the model for evaluation in another language.To understand why, we present a large number of probing experiments, showing that transfer is possible even to languages in different scripts, that transfer works best between typologically similar languages, that monolingual corpora can train models for code-switching, and that the model can find translation pairs.From these results, we can conclude that M-BERT does create multilingual representations, but that these representations exhibit systematic deficiencies affecting certain language pairs.
Telmo Pires, Eva Schlinger, Dan Garrette
ACL (1)1