Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Koen Helwegen
dblp:242/8320
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 48% Efficient and distributed learning · 40% Deep learning architectures and training · 12% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization › quantized neural network
binary neural network |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | How Do Adam and Training Strategies Help BNNs Optimization · ICML 2021 Latent Weights Do Not Exist: Rethinking Binarized Neural Network Optimization · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › adaptive optimization
adam |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | How Do Adam and Training Strategies Help BNNs Optimization · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
adaptive optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | How Do Adam and Training Strategies Help BNNs Optimization · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | How Do Adam and Training Strategies Help BNNs Optimization · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Latent Weights Do Not Exist: Rethinking Binarized Neural Network Optimization · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Latent Weights Do Not Exist: Rethinking Binarized Neural Network Optimization · NeurIPS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weight decay · 0.5second-order momentum · 0.5adam · 0.5latent weights · 0.4inertia · 0.4binary optimizer · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | How Do Adam and Training Strategies Help BNNs OptimizationabstractThe best performing Binary Neural Networks (BNNs) are usually attained using Adam optimization and its multi-step training variants. However, to the best of our knowledge, few studies explore the fundamental reasons why Adam is superior to other optimizers like SGD for BNN optimization or provide analytical explanations that support specific training strategies. To address this, in this paper we first investigate the trajectories of gradients and weights in BNNs during the training process. We show the regularization effect of second-order momentum in Adam is crucial to revitalize the weights that are dead due to the activation saturation in BNNs. We find that Adam, through its adaptive learning rate strategy, is better equipped to handle the rugged loss surface of BNNs and reaches a better optimum with higher generalization ability. Furthermore, we inspect the intriguing role of the real-valued weights in binary networks, and reveal the effect of weight decay on the stability and sluggishness of BNN optimization. Through extensive experiments and analysis, we derive a simple training scheme, building on existing Adam-based optimization, which achieves 70.5% top-1 accuracy on the ImageNet dataset using the same architecture as the state-of-the-art ReActNet while achieving 1.1% higher accuracy. Code and models are available at https://github.com/liuzechun/AdamBNN. Zechun Liu, Shichao Li 0002, Koen Helwegen, Dong Huang 0007, Kwang-Ting Cheng |
ICML | 4 |
| 2019 | Latent Weights Do Not Exist: Rethinking Binarized Neural Network OptimizationabstractOptimization of Binarized Neural Networks (BNNs) currently relies on real-valued latent weights to accumulate small update steps. In this paper, we argue that these latent weights cannot be treated analogously to weights in real-valued networks. Instead their main role is to provide inertia during training. We interpret current methods in terms of inertia and provide novel insights into the optimization of BNNs. We subsequently introduce the first optimizer specifically designed for BNNs, Binary Optimizer (Bop), and demonstrate its performance on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet. Together, the redefinition of latent weights as inertia and the introduction of Bop enable a better understanding of BNN optimization and open up the way for further improvements in training methodologies for BNNs. Koen Helwegen, James Widdicombe, Lukas Geiger, Zechun Liu, Kwang-Ting Cheng, Roeland Nusselder |
NeurIPS | 1 |