Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kosuke Tanizaki
dblp:242/8335
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 50% Mathematical optimization · 50% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Computing Valid P-Values for Image Segmentation by Selective Inference · CVPR 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
selective inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Computing Valid P-Values for Image Segmentation by Selective Inference · CVPR 2020 |
Information theory
statistical inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Computing Valid P-Values for Image Segmentation by Selective Inference · CVPR 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
selective inference · 0.9graph cuts · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Computing Valid P-Values for Image Segmentation by Selective InferenceabstractImage segmentation is one of the most fundamental tasks in computer vision. In many practical applications, it is essential to properly evaluate the reliability of individual segmentation results. In this study, we propose a novel framework for quantifying the statistical significance of individual segmentation results in the form of p-values by statistically testing the difference between the object region and the background region. This seemingly simple problem is actually quite challenging because the difference --- called segmentation bias --- can be deceptively large due to the adaptation of the segmentation algorithm to the data. To overcome this difficulty, we introduce a statistical approach called selective inference, and develop a framework for computing valid p-values in which segmentation bias is properly accounted for. Although the proposed framework is potentially applicable to various segmentation algorithms, we focus in this paper on graph-cut- and threshold-based segmentation algorithms, and develop two specific methods for computing valid p-values for the segmentation results obtained by these algorithms. We prove the theoretical validity of these two methods and demonstrate their practicality by applying them to the segmentation of medical images. Kosuke Tanizaki, Noriaki Hashimoto, Yu Inatsu, Hidekata Hontani, Ichiro Takeuchi |
CVPR | 1 |