Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Roberto Bondesan
dblp:242/9104
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 1 first-author · 7 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Generative modeling · 32% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 20% Optimization for machine learning · 20% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Emerging computing paradigms · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › guided diffusion
classifier-free guidance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Feynman-Kac Correctors in Diffusion: Annealing, Guidance, and Product of Experts · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Feynman-Kac Correctors in Diffusion: Annealing, Guidance, and Product of Experts · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › guided diffusion
inference-time guidance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Feynman-Kac Correctors in Diffusion: Annealing, Guidance, and Product of Experts · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
sampling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Feynman-Kac Correctors in Diffusion: Annealing, Guidance, and Product of Experts · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
sequential monte carlo |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Feynman-Kac Correctors in Diffusion: Annealing, Guidance, and Product of Experts · ICML 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
scheduling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Robust Scheduling with GFlowNets · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
batch bayesian optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Batch Bayesian Optimization on Permutations using the Acquisition Weighted Kernel · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Batch Bayesian Optimization on Permutations using the Acquisition Weighted Kernel · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
combinatorial optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Batch Bayesian Optimization on Permutations using the Acquisition Weighted Kernel · NeurIPS 2022 |
Compilers and program optimization
instruction scheduling |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Neural Topological Ordering for Computation Graphs · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Probabilistic Numeric Convolutional Neural Networks · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
probabilistic numerics |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Probabilistic Numeric Convolutional Neural Networks · ICLR 2021 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computing
quantum machine learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The Hintons in your Neural Network: a Quantum Field Theory View of Deep Learning · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
molecular generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Feynman-Kac Correctors in Diffusion: Annealing, Guidance, and Product of Experts · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
attention-based graph neural network |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Neural Topological Ordering for Computation Graphs · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Neural Topological Ordering for Computation Graphs · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Batch Bayesian Optimization on Permutations using the Acquisition Weighted Kernel · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › assignment problem
quadratic assignment problem |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Batch Bayesian Optimization on Permutations using the Acquisition Weighted Kernel · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
topoformer · 1.1thompson sampling · 1.1encoder-decoder · 1.1determinantal point process · 1.1attention-based graph neural network · 1.1acquisition weighted kernel · 1.1sequential monte carlo · 0.9feynman-kac formula · 0.9annealing · 0.9GFlowNets · 0.7unitary quantum gates · 0.5optical quantum computing · 0.5gaussian states · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Feynman-Kac Correctors in Diffusion: Annealing, Guidance, and Product of ExpertsabstractWhile score-based generative models are the model of choice across diverse domains, there are limited tools available for controlling inference-time behavior in a principled manner, e.g. for composing multiple pretrained models. Existing classifier-free guidance methods use a simple heuristic to mix conditional and unconditional scores to approximately sample from conditional distributions. However, such methods do not approximate the intermediate distributions, necessitating additional ‘corrector’ steps. In this work, we provide an efficient and principled method for sampling from a sequence of annealed, geometric-averaged, or product distributions derived from pretrained score-based models. We derive a weighted simulation scheme which we call Feynman-Kac Correctors (FKCs) based on the celebrated Feynman-Kac formula by carefully accounting for terms in the appropriate partial differential equations (PDEs). To simulate these PDEs, we propose Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) resampling algorithms that leverage inference-time scaling to improve sampling quality. We empirically demonstrate the utility of our methods by proposing amortized sampling via inference-time temperature annealing, improving multi-objective molecule generation using pretrained models, and improving classifier-free guidance for text-to-image generation. Marta Skreta, Tara Akhound-Sadegh, Viktor Ohanesian, Roberto Bondesan, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, Arnaud Doucet, Rob Brekelmans, Alexander Tong 0001, Kirill Neklyudov |
ICML | 4 |
| 2023 | Neural Simulated AnnealingabstractSimulated annealing (SA) is a stochastic global optimisation metaheuristic applicable to a wide range of discrete and continuous variable problems. Despite its simplicity, SA hinges on carefully handpicked components, viz. proposal distribution and annealing schedule, that often have to be fine tuned to individual problem instances. In this work, we seek to make SA more effective and easier to use by framing its proposal distribution as a reinforcement learning policy that can be optimised for higher solution quality given a computational budget. The result is Neural SA, a competitive and general machine learning method for combinatorial optimisation that is efficient, and easy to design and train. We show Neural SA with such a learnt proposal distribution, parametrised by small equivariant neural networks, outperforms SA baselines on several problems: Rosenbrock’s function and the Knapsack, Bin Packing and Travelling Salesperson problems. We also show Neural SA scales well to large problems (generalising to much larger instances than those seen during training) while getting comparable performance to popular off-the-shelf solvers and machine learning methods in terms of solution quality and wall-clock time. Alvaro Henrique Chaim Correia, Daniel E. Worrall, Roberto Bondesan |
AISTATS | 3 |
| 2023 | Robust Scheduling with GFlowNets
David W. Zhang, Corrado Rainone, Markus Peschl, Roberto Bondesan |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2022 | Learning Perturbations for Soft-Output Linear MIMO DemappersabstractTree-based demappers for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) detection such as the sphere decoder can achieve near-optimal performance but incur high computational cost due to their sequential nature. In this paper, we propose the perturbed linear demapper (PLM), which is a novel data-driven model for computing soft outputs in parallel. To achieve this, the PLM learns a distribution centered on an initial linear estimate and a log-likelihood ratio clipping parameter using end-to-end Bayesian optimization. Furthermore, we show that lattice-reduction can be naturally incorporated into the PLM pipeline, which allows to trade off computational cost against coded block error rate reduction. We find that the optimized PLM can achieve near maximum-likelihood (ML) performance in Rayleigh channels, making it an efficient alternative to tree-based demappers. Daniel E. Worrall, Markus Peschl, Arash Behboodi, Roberto Bondesan |
GLOBECOM | 4 |
| 2022 | Neural Topological Ordering for Computation GraphsabstractRecent works on machine learning for combinatorial optimization have shown that learning based approaches can outperform heuristic methods in terms of speed and performance. In this paper, we consider the problem of finding an optimal topological order on a directed acyclic graph (DAG) with focus on the memory minimization problem which arises in compilers. We propose an end-to-end machine learning based approach for topological ordering using an encoder-decoder framework. Our encoder is a novel attention based graph neural network architecture called \emph{Topoformer} which uses different topological transforms of a DAG for message passing. The node embeddings produced by the encoder are converted into node priorities which are used by the decoder to generate a probability distribution over topological orders. We train our model on a dataset of synthetically generated graphs called layered graphs. We show that our model outperforms, or is on-par, with several topological ordering baselines while being significantly faster on synthetic graphs with up to 2k nodes. We also train and test our model on a set of real-world computation graphs, showing performance improvements. Mukul Gagrani, Corrado Rainone, Harris Teague, Wonseok Jeon, Roberto Bondesan, Herke van Hoof, Christopher Lott, Weiliang Will Zeng, Piero Zappi |
NeurIPS | 6 |
| 2022 | Batch Bayesian Optimization on Permutations using the Acquisition Weighted KernelabstractIn this work we propose a batch Bayesian optimization method for combinatorial problems on permutations, which is well suited for expensive-to-evaluate objectives. We first introduce LAW, an efficient batch acquisition method based on determinantal point processes using the acquisition weighted kernel. Relying on multiple parallel evaluations, LAW enables accelerated search on combinatorial spaces. We then apply the framework to permutation problems, which have so far received little attention in the Bayesian Optimization literature, despite their practical importance. We call this method LAW2ORDER. On the theoretical front, we prove that LAW2ORDER has vanishing simple regret by showing that the batch cumulative regret is sublinear. Empirically, we assess the method on several standard combinatorial problems involving permutations such as quadratic assignment, flowshop scheduling and the traveling salesman, as well as on a structure learning task. ChangYong Oh, Roberto Bondesan, Efstratios Gavves, Max Welling |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | Probabilistic Numeric Convolutional Neural Networks
Marc Finzi, Roberto Bondesan, Max Welling |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2021 | The Hintons in your Neural Network: a Quantum Field Theory View of Deep LearningabstractIn this work we develop a quantum field theory formalism for deep learning, where input signals are encoded in Gaussian states, a generalization of Gaussian processes which encode the agent’s uncertainty about the input signal. We show how to represent linear and non-linear layers as unitary quantum gates, and interpret the fundamental excitations of the quantum model as particles, dubbed “Hintons”. On top of opening a new perspective and techniques for studying neural networks, the quantum formulation is well suited for optical quantum computing, and provides quantum deformations of neural networks that can be run efficiently on those devices. Finally, we discuss a semi-classical limit of the quantum deformed models which is amenable to classical simulation. Roberto Bondesan, Max Welling |
ICML | 1 |