Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Olga Mineeva
dblp:243/2983
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Time series and sequential data · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
anomaly detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | (1 + epsilon)-class Classification: an Anomaly Detection Method for Highly Imbalanced or Incomplete Data Sets · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › anomaly detection
one-class classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | (1 + epsilon)-class Classification: an Anomaly Detection Method for Highly Imbalanced or Incomplete Data Sets · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
metagenomics |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | DeepMAsED: evaluating the quality of metagenomic assemblies · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly › genome assembly
misassembly detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | DeepMAsED: evaluating the quality of metagenomic assemblies · Bioinform. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
two-class classification · 0.4one-class classification · 0.4deep learning · 0.4convolutional neural network · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | ResMiCo: Increasing the quality of metagenome-assembled genomes with deep learningabstractThe number of published metagenome assemblies is rapidly growing due to advances in sequencing technologies. However, sequencing errors, variable coverage, repetitive genomic regions, and other factors can produce misassemblies, which are challenging to detect for taxonomically novel genomic data. Assembly errors can affect all downstream analyses of the assemblies. Accuracy for the state of the art in reference-free misassembly prediction does not exceed an AUPRC of 0.57, and it is not clear how well these models generalize to real-world data. Here, we present the Residual neural network for Misassembled Contig identification (ResMiCo), a deep learning approach for reference-free identification of misassembled contigs. To develop ResMiCo, we first generated a training dataset of unprecedented size and complexity that can be used for further benchmarking and developments in the field. Through rigorous validation, we show that ResMiCo is substantially more accurate than the state of the art, and the model is robust to novel taxonomic diversity and varying assembly methods. ResMiCo estimated 7% misassembled contigs per metagenome across multiple real-world datasets. We demonstrate how ResMiCo can be used to optimize metagenome assembly hyperparameters to improve accuracy, instead of optimizing solely for contiguity. The accuracy, robustness, and ease-of-use of ResMiCo make the tool suitable for general quality control of metagenome assemblies and assembly methodology optimization. Olga Mineeva, Daniel Danciu, Bernhard Schölkopf, Ruth E. Ley, Gunnar Rätsch, Nicholas D. Youngblut |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |
| 2020 | DeepMAsED: evaluating the quality of metagenomic assembliesabstractMOTIVATION: Methodological advances in metagenome assembly are rapidly increasing in the number of published metagenome assemblies. However, identifying misassemblies is challenging due to a lack of closely related reference genomes that can act as pseudo ground truth. Existing reference-free methods are no longer maintained, can make strong assumptions that may not hold across a diversity of research projects, and have not been validated on large-scale metagenome assemblies. RESULTS: We present DeepMAsED, a deep learning approach for identifying misassembled contigs without the need for reference genomes. Moreover, we provide an in silico pipeline for generating large-scale, realistic metagenome assemblies for comprehensive model training and testing. DeepMAsED accuracy substantially exceeds the state-of-the-art when applied to large and complex metagenome assemblies. Our model estimates a 1% contig misassembly rate in two recent large-scale metagenome assembly publications. CONCLUSIONS: DeepMAsED accurately identifies misassemblies in metagenome-assembled contigs from a broad diversity of bacteria and archaea without the need for reference genomes or strong modeling assumptions. Running DeepMAsED is straight-forward, as well as is model re-training with our dataset generation pipeline. Therefore, DeepMAsED is a flexible misassembly classifier that can be applied to a wide range of metagenome assembly projects. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: DeepMAsED is available from GitHub at https://github.com/leylabmpi/DeepMAsED. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Olga Mineeva, Mateo Rojas-Carulla, Ruth E. Ley, Bernhard Schölkopf, Nicholas D. Youngblut |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2020 | (1 + epsilon)-class Classification: an Anomaly Detection Method for Highly Imbalanced or Incomplete Data SetsabstractAnomaly detection is not an easy problem since distribution of anomalous samples is unknown a priori. We explore a novel method that gives a trade-off possibility between one-class and two-class approaches, and leads to a better performance on anomaly detection problems with small or non-representative anomalous samples. The method is evaluated using several data sets and compared to a set of conventional one-class and two-class approaches. Maxim Borisyak, Artem Ryzhikov, Andrey Ustyuzhanin, Denis Derkach, Fedor Ratnikov, Olga Mineeva |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 6 |