Carl Einarson

dblp:243/3055 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-2814-7018ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 3 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 p-Edge/vertex-connected vertex cover: Parameterized and approximation algorithms
abstract
We introduce and study two natural generalizations of the Connected Vertex Cover (VC) problem: the p-Edge-Connected and p-Vertex-Connected VC problem (where p≥2 is a fixed integer). We obtain an 2O(pk)nO(1)-time algorithm for p-Edge-Connected VC and an 2O(k2)nO(1)-time algorithm for p-Vertex-Connected VC. Thus, like Connected VC, both constrained VC problems are FPT. Furthermore, like Connected VC, neither problem admits a polynomial kernel unless NP ⊆ coNP/poly, which is highly unlikely. We prove however that both problems admit time efficient polynomial sized approximate kernelization schemes. Finally, we describe a 2(p+1)-approximation algorithm for the p-Edge-Connected VC. The proofs for the new VC problems require more sophisticated arguments than for Connected VC. In particular, for the approximation algorithm we use Gomory-Hu trees and for the approximate kernels a result on small-size spanning p-vertex/edge-connected subgraphs of a p-vertex/edge-connected graph by Nishizeki and Poljak (1994) and Nagamochi and Ibaraki (1992).
Carl Einarson, Gregory Z. Gutin, Bart M. P. Jansen, Diptapriyo Majumdar, Magnus Wahlström
J. Comput. Syst. Sci.1
2020 A General Kernelization Technique for Domination and Independence Problems in Sparse Classes
abstract
We unify and extend previous kernelization techniques in sparse classes [6,17] by defining water lilies and show how they can be used in bounded expansion classes to construct linear bikernels for (r, c)-Dominating Set, (r, c)-Scattered Set, Total r-Domination, r-Roman Domination, and a problem we call (r, [λ, μ])-Domination (implying a bikernel for r-Perfect Code). At the cost of slightly changing the output graph class our bikernels can be turned into kernels. We further demonstrate how these constructions can be combined to create 'multikernels', meaning graphs that represent kernels for multiple problems at once. Concretely, we show that r-Dominating Set, Total r-Domination, and r-Roman Domination admit a multikernel; as well as r-Dominating Set and 2r-Independent Set for multiple values of r at once.
Carl Einarson, Felix Reidl
IPEC1
2019 Domination Above r-Independence: Does Sparseness Help?
abstract
Inspired by the potential of improving tractability via gap- or above-guarantee parametrisations, we investigate the complexity of Dominating Set when given a suitable lower-bound witness. Concretely, we consider being provided with a maximal r-independent set X (a set in which all vertices have pairwise distance at least r+1) along the input graph G which, for r >= 2, lower-bounds the minimum size of any dominating set of G. In the spirit of gap-parameters, we consider a parametrisation by the size of the "residual" set R := V(G) \ N[X]. Our work aims to answer two questions: How does the constant r affect the tractability of the problem and does the restriction to sparse graph classes help here? For the base case r = 2, we find that the problem is paraNP-complete even in apex- and bounded-degree graphs. For r = 3, the problem is W[2]-hard for general graphs but in FPT for nowhere dense classes and it admits a linear kernel for bounded expansion classes. For r >= 4, the parametrisation becomes essentially equivalent to the natural parameter, the size of the dominating set.
Carl Einarson, Felix Reidl
MFCS1