Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Simone Piaggesi

dblp:243/3242 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-9710-6255ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 55% Graph learning · 26% Optimization for machine learning · 19%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
1.622025
Explanations Go Linear: Post-Hoc Explainability for Tabular Data with Interpretable Meta-Encoding · ICDM 2025
DINE: Dimensional Interpretability of Node Embeddings · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
post-hoc explanation
0.912025
Explanations Go Linear: Post-Hoc Explainability for Tabular Data with Interpretable Meta-Encoding · ICDM 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
surrogate model
0.912025
Explanations Go Linear: Post-Hoc Explainability for Tabular Data with Interpretable Meta-Encoding · ICDM 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning
network embedding
0.812024
DINE: Dimensional Interpretability of Node Embeddings · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning
link prediction
0.212024
DINE: Dimensional Interpretability of Node Embeddings · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
node classification
0.212024
DINE: Dimensional Interpretability of Node Embeddings · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

representation learning · 0.9meta-encoder · 0.9linear transformation · 0.9embedding retrofitting · 0.8dimensionality interpretability metrics · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Explanations Go Linear: Post-Hoc Explainability for Tabular Data with Interpretable Meta-Encoding
abstract
Post-hoc explainability is essential for understanding black-box machine learning models. Surrogate-based techniques are widely used for local and global model-agnostic explanations but have significant limitations. Local surrogates capture non-linearities but are computationally expensive and sensitive to parameters, while global surrogates are more efficient but struggle with complex local behaviors. In this paper, we present ILLUME, a flexible and interpretable framework grounded in representation learning, that can be integrated with various surrogate models to provide explanations for any black-box classifier. Specifically, our approach combines a globally trained surrogate with instance-specific linear transformations learned with a meta-encoder to generate both local and global explanations. Through extensive empirical evaluations, we demonstrate the effectiveness of ILLUME in producing feature attributions and decision rules that are not only accurate but also robust and computationally efficient, thus providing a unified explanation framework that effectively addresses the limitations of traditional surrogate methods.
Simone Piaggesi, Riccardo Guidotti, Fosca Giannotti, Dino Pedreschi
ICDM1
2024 DINE: Dimensional Interpretability of Node Embeddings
abstract
Graph representation learning methods, such as node embeddings, are powerful approaches to map nodes into a latent vector space, allowing their use for various graph learning tasks. Despite their success, these techniques are inherently black-boxes and few studies have focused on investigating local explanations of node embeddings for specific instances. Moreover, explaining the overall behavior of unsupervised embedding models remains an unexplored problem, limiting global interpretability and debugging potentials. We address this gap by developing human-understandable explanations for latent space dimensions in node embeddings. Towards that, we first develop new metrics that measure the global interpretability of embeddings based on the marginal contribution of the latent dimensions to predicting graph structure. We say an embedding dimension is more interpretable if it can faithfully map to an understandable sub-structure in the input graph - like community structure. Having observed that standard node embeddings have low interpretability, we then introduceDine(Dimension-based Interpretable Node Embedding). This novel approach can retrofit existing node embeddings by making them more interpretable without sacrificing their task performance. We conduct extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world graphs and show that we can simultaneously learn highly interpretable node embeddings with effective performance in link prediction and node classification.
Simone Piaggesi, Megha Khosla, André Panisson, Avishek Anand
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1